Management of Complications of Posterior Lumber Spine Fixation for Spondylolithesis

Authors

  • Karim Mourad Department of Neurological Surgery, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • Amr Ali Hasanain Department of Neurological Surgery, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • Sameh Ahmed Sakr Department of Neurological Surgery, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • Amr Abdelmonam Mostafa Elkatatny Department of Neurological Surgery, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.7685

Keywords:

Fixation, Complications, Lumbar, Spine

Abstract

This study was aiming at identifying the varieties, causes, treatment and prevention of post lumbar instrumental fixation complications, which was done on a study population of 50 cases, without stratification on bases of sex or age, excluding the patients with known chronic debilitating diseases. Regarding the patients’ population, our demographics shows a clear role of obesity in the pathogenesis of spondylolisthesis in general, regardless of age or sex, the mean BMI was above 30, and this does indeed agree with most studies as mentioned before. Analyzing our results, we found the most affected levels to be L4-5, and L5-S1, which coincides with other studies discussed before, we also found significant dominance of back pain as a presenting complaint, while neurological deficits were rare, by analyzing the etiologies of pathological findings in our patients we found isthmic lythesis followed by spondylolisthesis as the most common etiologies respectively among the studied population.Regarding the positive finding requiring further management in our study, the most common finding was failed prosthesis, and adjacent segment failure, other less frequent findings include Sacroiliac dysfunction, posterior cage migration, screw malpostioning, infection, Dural tear, CSF leak, pseudarthrosis, and one patient with pseudo-meningocele.32 patients (64%) were managed surgically, while the other 18 patients (36%) were managed conservatively, 40 patients had improved complaints, while 10 cases didn’t improve, our results should be seen in the light that our sample size was small, which can be a great limiting factor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, Sweeney CA, Grant WD, Baker D. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(10):1027-35; discussion 1035. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000061992.98108.A0 PMid:12768144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000061992.98108.A0

Chen JC. Occupational and personal factors associated with acquired lumbar spondylolisthesis of urban taxi drivers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(12):992-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2003.011775 PMid:15550605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2003.011775

Cho JH, Lee JH, Song KS, Hong JY. Neuropathic pain after spinal surgery. Asian Spine J. 2017;11(4):642-52. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.642 PMid:28874984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.642

Ekman M, Jönhagen S, Hunsche E, Jönsson L. Burden of illness of chronic low back pain in Sweden: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in primary care setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(15):1777-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000171911.99348.90 PMid:16094281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000171911.99348.90

Humphreys S, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(5):567-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00023 PMid:11242386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00023

Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, Monrad H, Gebuhr P. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: An epidemiological perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(1):120-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000250979.12398.96 PMid:17202902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000250979.12398.96

Jutte P, Castelein R. Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(6):594-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0469-8 PMid:12522719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0469-8

Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Smith HS. Preliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: Part 1-discogenic pain without disc herniation or radiculitis. 2008; 11(6):785-800. PMid:19057626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2008/11/785

Al Saadwy MA, Barakat Y, Fouad M, Elgendy AE, Roshdy S. Management of postoperative complications after posterior lumber spinal fixation. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;72(7):4786-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2018.10133

Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(4):329-34. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679908997819 PMid:10569260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679908997819

Park J, Kim Y, Hong H, Hwang SN. Comparison between posterior and transforminal approches for lumbar interbody fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2005;37:340-4.

Sakai T, Sairyo K, Takao S, Nishitani H, Yasui N. Incidence of lumbar spondylolysis in the general population in Japan based on multidetector computed tomography scans from two thousand subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(21):2346-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4abbe PMid:19934813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4abbe

Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(9):769-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.014 PMid:15978850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.014

Takebayashi T, Cavanaugh JM, Kallakuri S, Chen C, Yamashita T. Sympathetic afferent units from lumbar intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(4):554-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17194 PMid:16567796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17194

Wang YX, Griffith JF, Zeng XJ, Deng M, Kwok AW, Leung JC, et al. Prevalence and sex difference of lumbar disc space narrowing in elderly Chinese men and women: Osteoporotic fractures in men (Hong Kong) and osteoporotic fractures in women (Hong Kong) studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(4):1004-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37857 PMid:23335175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37857

Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2257-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070302 PMid:17538085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070302

Downloads

Published

2022-01-08

How to Cite

1.
Mourad K, Hasanain AA, Sakr SA, Elkatatny AAM. Management of Complications of Posterior Lumber Spine Fixation for Spondylolithesis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 8 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];10(B):448-56. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/7685