Risk Analysis and Hazard Mitigation on Pig Acceptance Process of A Gas Company based on Occupational Safety and Health

Rinawati Pudji Handajani; Qomariyatus Sholihah; Hadi Suyono; Ishardita Pambudi Tama; Zainul Abidin; Sri Widiyawati; Raditya Ardianwiliandri; Kintan Ramira Putri

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.7964

Authors

Rinawati Pudji Handajani Engineering Profession Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Qomariyatus Sholihah Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Hadi Suyono Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Ishardita Pambudi Tama Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Zainul Abidin Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Sri Widiyawati Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia
Raditya Ardianwiliandri Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-5185
Kintan Ramira Putri Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java Province, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.7964

Keywords:

Occupational health and safety, Risk analysis, Urgency, Impact analysis

Abstract

AIM: PT. Pertamina Gas goes through the process of pig receiving at one of its operations. To support the Occupational Safety and Health (OHS) system, a system is needed to minimize risks. This system is expected to minimize the risks that occur to employees and their environment when carrying out the operation process.

METHODS: Risk analysis was carried out to find information regarding the level of possibility and impact of an event in the operation. In this case, the impact analysis was done on several aspects including people, assets, image, and the environment.

RESULTS: The risk assessment results of the Gresik gas station pig, it was found that low risk of 0%, medium 51%, and high 49% for activity in the gas station.

CONCLUSIONS: The result informs that from risk assessment resulted the Gresik gas station pig level of acceptance has a low risk of 0%, medium 51%, and high 49%. This three level of risk from assessment informs about the potential for occurrence and impacts on the case study. Moreover, from high level of risk need more attention and focus to minimize the risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Hinawan H. Gambaran Sistem Emergency Response and Preparedness Sebagai Upaya Pengendalian Kondisi Darurat di PT. Polypet Karyapersada Cilegon-Banten; 2010.

Sumamur PK. Corporate Hygiene and Occupational Health. Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto; 2009.

Potter L. New transmigration “paradigm” in I ndonesia: Examples from Kalimantan. Asia Pac Viewpoint. 2012;53(3):272-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2012.01492.x

Zhang X, Mohandes SR. Occupational health and safety in green building construction projects: A holistic Z-numbers-based risk management framework. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;275:122788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122788

Reyes JP, San-José JT, Cuadrado J, Sancibrian R. Health and Safety criteria for determining the sustainable value of construction projects. Saf Sci. 2014;62:221-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.023

Åsgård T, Jørgensen L. Health and safety in early phases of project management in construction. Proc Comput Sci. 2019;164:343-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.192

Pawin Vivid R, Selvakumar N, Ruvankumar M. Determination of hazard in truck manufacturing industry using hazard identification risk assessment technique. Mater Today. 2020;27(2):1858-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.006

Sholihah Q, Kuncoro W, Sari RA, Lukodono RP, Swara SE. Risk management of the implementation of work health safety in radiology. Utopia Praxis Latinoamericana. 2019;24:142-52.

Statistic. Agrekon. Agric Econ Res Policy Pract S Afr. 1970;9:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.1970.9524448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.1970.9524448

Selvanagaraj K, Prasanna SP. Hazard identification and risk assessment by qualitative and quantitative methods. Int J Adv Res Basic Eng Sci Technol. 2017;3(4):111-7.

Ramli S. Manajemen Risiko Dalam Perspektif K3 OHS Risk Management. Jakarta: PT Dian Rakyat; 2010.

Wigati DT. Analisis dan Mitigasi Risiko Dengan Metode Risk Assessment (Studi Kasus: PG Madukismo; 2018.

Dhaniya S, Parihar SK. Isolation and identification of flavonoids from Alhagi maurorum. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(3):1321-5.

Gunawan S, Yupie K. Mitigasi risiko aset dan komponen teknologi informasi berdasarkan kerangka kerja OCTAVE dan FMEA pada Universitas Dian Nuswantoro. J Inf Syst. 2017;9(2):513-22.

Ashraf AM, Imran W, Véchot L. Analysis of the impact of a pandemic on the control of the process safety risk in major hazards industries using a Fault Tree Analysis approach. J Loss Prev Proc Ind.2022;74:104649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104649 PMid:34629762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104649

Purohit DP, Siddiqui NA, Nandan A, Yadav BP. Hazard identification and risk assessment in petrochemical industry. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2020;8(9):778-83. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31583

Ajith S, Arumugaprabu V, Ajith V, Naresh K, Sreekanth PS. Hazard identification and risk assessment in firework industry. Mater Today. 2022; proceedings 56:1083-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.102