The Potential Test of the Mosquito Oviposition Preference Using Similar Subtracts: Colonized Water and Aides Larvae Extract

Muhammad Saleh; Isra Wahid; Anwar Daud; Anwar Mallongi; Syamsiar S. Russeng

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8184

Authors

Muhammad Saleh Department of Public Health, Alauddin State Islamic University, Makassar, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-6781
Isra Wahid Doctoral of Public Health Program, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Anwar Daud Department of Parasitologi-Entomologi, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Anwar Mallongi Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Syamsiar S. Russeng Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-6781

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8184

Keywords:

Oviposition preference, Attractant, Water colonization, Aedes larvae extract, Similar substrate

Abstract

The research on ovitrap using attractants have been extensively developed, but studies on the use of similar substrates in the form of colonized water and Aedes larvae extract as attractants have not been widely published. Adding an attractant to the ovitrap can stimulate the sense of smell for mosquitoes to come to the place to lay their eggs. The use of ovitrap has recently begun to be developed because it is environmentally friendly. The purpose of this study is to determine the attractants potential of colonized water and larvae extract as the oviposition preferences for of Aedes Sp. to lay eggs in the ovitrap. The type of this research is a true experimental design, the design of The Posttest-Only Control Group Design. Observations are made in the laboratory for nine repetitions. Observational data show that the average number of eggs in ovitraps that uses the colonized water and larvae extract is higher than that of conventional/control water. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test indicate that there is a significant difference in the average number of eggs in the colonized water attractant, larval extract and conventional water (Asymp. Sig < 0.05). The conclusion is obtained that similar substrate attractants in the form of larvae extract and Aedes colonization water have the potential to be Aedes sp oviposition preferences compared to conventional water. However, it is still necessary to conduct a field study so that it can be used as an environmentally friendly method of the surveillance and control of the vector transmitting Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Rothman AL. Immunity to dengue virus: A tale of original antigenic sin and tropical cytokine storms. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(8):532-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3014 PMid:21760609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3014

Moyes CL, Vontas J, Martins AJ, Ching Ng L, Ying Koou S, Dusfour I, et al. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7):0005625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005625 PMid:28727779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005625

Boyer S, Lopes S, Prasetyo D, Hustedt J, Sao Sarady A, Doum D, et al. Resistance of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations to deltamethrin, permethrin, and temephos in Cambodia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018;30(2):158-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539517753876 PMid:29502428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539517753876

Martini M, Hestiningsih R, Widjanarko B, Purwantisari S. Resistance of Aedes as a vectors potential for dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) in Semarang City, Indonesia. J Trop Life Sci. 2019;9(1):89-94. https://doi.org.10.11594/jtls.09.01.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.09.01.12

Pinkney AE, McGowan PC, Murphy DR, Lowe TP, Sparling DW, Ferrington LC. Effects of the mosquito larvicides temephos and methoprene on insect populations in experimental ponds. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(3):678-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620190320

Su T, Jiang Y, Mulla M. Toxicity and effects of mosquito larvicides methoprene and surface film (Agnique ® MMF) on the development and fecundity of the tadpole shrimp triops newberryi (Packard) (Notostraca: Triopsidae). J Vector Ecol. 2014;39(2):340-6. https://doi.org/10.3376/i1081-1710-39-340 PMid:25424263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12109

Abeyasuriya KG, Nugapola NP, Perera MD, Karunaratne WA, Karunaratne SH. Effect of dengue mosquito control insecticide thermal fogging on non-target insects. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2017;37(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758416000254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758416000254

World Health Organization. Global Strategic Framework for Integrated Vector Management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1564/v24_jun_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1564/v24_jun_14

Anderson EM, DAVIS JA. Field evaluation of the response of Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) to three oviposition attractants and different ovitrap placements using black and clear autocidal ovitraps in a rural area of Same, Timor-Leste. Med Vet Entomol. 2014;28(4):372-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12062 PMid:24805793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12062

Mokany A, Shine R. Oviposition site selection by mosquitoes is affected by cues from conspecific larvae and anuran tadpoles. Austral Ecol. 2003;28(1):33-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01239.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01239.x

Wooding M, Rohwer ER, Naudé Y. Chemical profiling of the human skin surface for malaria vector control via a noninvasive sorptive sampler with GC×GC-tofms. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020;412(23):5759-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02799-y PMid:32681223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02799-y

Kemibala EE, Mafra-Neto A, Saroli J, Silva R, Philbert A, Ng’habi K, et al. Is Anopheles gambiae attraction to floral and human skin-based odours and their combination modulated by previous blood meal experience? Malar J. 2020;19(1):318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03395-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03395-2

Müller G, Xue RD, Schlein Y. Differential attraction of Aedes albopictus in the field to flowers, fruits and honeydew. Acta Trop. 2011;118(1):45-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.01.009

Turnipseed RK, Moran PJ, Allan SA. Behavioral responses of gravid Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus mosquitoes to aquatic macrophyte volatiles. J Vector Ecol. 2018;43(2):252-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12309 PMid:30408300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12309

Federer WT. Experimental Design Theory and Application. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., 1963.

Thavara U, Tawatsin A, Chompoosri J. Evaluation of attractants and egg-laying substrate preference for oviposition by Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol. 2004;29(1):66-72.

Lampman RL, Novak RJ. Oviposition preferences of culex pipiens and culex restuans for infusion-baited traps. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996;12(1):23-32. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971x(2006)21[360:opocra]2.0.co;2

Allan SA, Kline DL. Evaluation of organic infusions and synthetic compounds mediating oviposition in Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Chem Ecol. 1995;21(11):1847-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033681 PMid:24233834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033681

Afify A, Galizia CG. Chemosensory cues for mosquito oviposition site selection. J Med Entomol. 2015;52(2):120-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tju024 PMid:26336295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tju024

Mwingira V, Mboera LE, Dicke M, Takken W. Exploiting the chemical ecology of mosquito oviposition behavior in mosquito surveillance and control: A review. J Vector Ecol. 2020;45(2):155-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvec.12387

Mawardi M, Busra R. Studi perbandingan jenis sumber air terhadap daya tarik nyamuk Aedes aegypti untuk bertelur. J Serambi Eng. 2019;4(2):593-602. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v4i2.1444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v4i2.1444

Gafur A, Jastam MS. Faktor yang berhubungan dengan keberadaan jentik nyamuk Ae- des eegypti di Kelurahan Batua Kota Makassar Tahun. J Public Health Sci. 2015;7(1):22-33. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v7.i1.2019.22-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.V7.I1.2019.22-33

Nurjana MA, Kurniawan A. Preferensi Aedes aegypti meletakkan telur pada berbagai warna ovitrap di laboratorium. Balaba J Litbang Pengendali. 2017;13(1):37-42. https://doi.org/10.22435/blb.v13i1.4825.37-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22435/blb.v13i1.4825.37-42

Polson A, Chris C, Chang SM, James GO, Olson G. The use of ovitraps baited with hay infusion as a surveillance tool for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in Cambodia. Dengue Bull. 2002;26:178-84.

Barrera R, Amador M, Acevedo V, Caban B, Felix G, Mackay AJ. Use of the CDC autocidal gravid ovitrap to control and prevent outbreaks of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2014;51(1):145-54. https://doi.org/10.1603/me13096 PMid:24605464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/ME13096

Johnson BJ, Ritchie SA, Fonseca DM. The state of the art of lethal oviposition trap-based mass interventions for arboviral control. Insects. 2017;8(1):1-16. https://doi.10.3390/insects8010005 PMid:28075354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8010005

Wong J, Stoddard TS, Astete H, Morrison AC, Scott TW. Oviposition site selection by the dengue vector Aedes aegypti and its implications for dengue control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):1015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001015 PMid:21532736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001015