The Dominant Factors Affecting the Low Participation of Young Women Ever Married in the Family Planning Program (KB) in Papua Province (2017 IDHS Data Analysis)

Siti Rahmadani; Mona S. Fatiah; Vina Dwi Wahyunita; Jusuf Kristianto; Gurid P.E Mulyo

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8187

Authors

Siti Rahmadani Deparement of Midwifery, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta I, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-8220
Mona S. Fatiah Department of Reproductive Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Cenderawasih, Jayapura, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-4948
Vina Dwi Wahyunita Department of Midwifery, Poltekkes Kemenkes Maluku, Nusaniwe, Indonesia
Jusuf Kristianto Departement of Dental Nursing, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta I, Jakarta, Indonesia
Gurid P.E Mulyo Departement of Nutrition, Poltekkes Kemenkes Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-9588

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8187

Keywords:

Participation, Use of family planning, Young women who have been married

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation in family planning (FP) among young women who have ever married is the spearhead in reducing the Total Fertility Rate in Papua Province. However, the percentage of FP use in Papua Province in Papua Province is still very low, at 74.88%. This study looks at the dominant factors that influence the low participation of ever married young women in FP programs in Papua Province.

METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study using data from the 2017 Indonesian Health Demographic Survey, conducted for ± 1 month. The sample in this study was 414 married young women in Papua Province in 2017. Data analysis in this study is the same way as multivariate analysis of risk factor models, which was processed using the STATA 12 application.

RESULTS: The final result of the multivariate analysis in this study was the household expenditure group variable (OR was 1.89 with a 95% CI value: 1.75–1.92), place of residence (OR 1.75 with 95% CI: 1.70–1.90), and age at first sexual intercourse (OR 2.34 with 95% CI: 2.24–2.48). In contrast, the most dominant variable that affects the low participation in FP use among young women who have ever been married in this study is the age of first sexual intercourse.

CONCLUSION: This study recommends the need for crosssectoral collaboration to socialize the Generation Planning (Genre) program in schools and universities in all corners of Papua Province.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

BPS. Indonesian Youth Statistics. Jakarta: BPS; 2014. p. 105.

UN. Data Booklet: Contraceptive Use by Method 2019. New York: United Nations; 2019.

UNF. FP2020 Women at the Center 2018-2019. New York: UNF; 2020. Available from: http://www.progress.familyplanning2020.org/sites/default/files/fp2020_2019report_final_110819.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 18].

BPS. Indonesian Youth Statistics. Jakarta: BPS; 2020. p. 105.

FP. Indonesia FP2020 Core Indicator Summary Sheet: 2019-2020 Annual Progress Report, USA; 2020. Available from: https://www.familyplanning2020.org/sites/default/files/indonesia20201-9handout.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 14].

WHO. Contraception Evidence Brief. Vol. 2. Switzerland: Reproductive Health; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth

Noviani A, Sari M, Septina HR, Hardianto. Maternal and Child Health Profile 2020. Statistics Indonesia, Jakarta; 2020. p. 126.

Bongaarts J. A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Popul Counc. 1987;4(1):105-32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1972149 [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 25]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1972149

Blake DK. The Social Structure of Fertility an Analytical Framework Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1956; 1956.

Kantorová V, Wheldon MC, Dasgupta AN, Ueffing P, Castanheira HC. Contraceptive use and needs among adolescent women aged 15-19: Regional and global estimates and projections from 1990 to 2030 from a Bayesian hierarchical modeling study. PLoS One 2021;16(3):e0247479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247479 PMid:33661965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247479

Suchithra E, Sujina CM. Current practice and determinants of family planning methods among married females in the reproductive age group (15-49yrs) in a rural setting, Kerala. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2016;3(1):13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-6776.2016.00002.3

Haque MN. Unmet need for contraceptive: The case of married adolescent women in Bangladesh. Int J Curr Res. 2010;2:29-35. Available from: http://www.journalcra.com/article/unmet-need-contraceptive-case-married-adolescent-women-bangladesh [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 02].

UNFPA. Universal Access to Reproductive Health, Unfpa. New York, United States: UNFPA; 2016. p. 104. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/unfpa_reproductive_paper_20160120_online.pdf

Rizkianti A, Amaliah N, Rachmalina R. Use of contraceptives in married adolescent girls in indonesia (analysis of riskesdas 2013). Bul Health Res. 2017;45(4):257-66. Available from: https://www.media.neliti.com/media/publications/21462-ID-factors-associated-with-contraceptive-use-among-early-married-couples-in-aikmel.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 10].

Sari NE, Rochaida E, Amalia S. Analysis of the influence of education and family planning participation (kb) on mothers’ decision to work in sungai Kujang district. J Econ Bus Mulawarman. 2018;20(1):40-5.

Suryani Y, Ramani A, Wati DM. Adolescent preferences in future family planning (study on adolescents in Kaliwates sub-district, Jember district). Artik Ilm Has Investigator Mhs. 2015;1(1):1-8.

Vijayasree L. A study on influence of education and occupation on family planning practices in rural shamirpet, R.R. District, T.S., India. Int J Bioassays. 2017;6(11):5525. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320792744_a_study_on_influence_of_education_and_occupation_on_family_planning_practices_in_rural_shamirpet_rr_district_ts_india https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.6.11.1 [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 1]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.6.11.1

Aslam SK, Zaheer S, Qureshi MS, Aslam SN, Shafique K. Socioeconomic disparities in use of family planning methods among pakistani women: Findings from pakistan demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153313 PMid:27055164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153313

Gupta N, Katende C, Bessinger RE. Associations of mass media exposure with family planning attitudes and practices in Uganda. Stud Fam Plann. 2017;34(1):19-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00019.x PMid:12772443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00019.x

Herowati D, Sugiharto M. The relationship between reproductive ability, child ownership, residence, education and working status in married women with the use of hormonal contraceptives in Indonesia in 2017. Bul Res Sist Health. 2019;22(2):91-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22435/hsr.v22i2.1553

Qibthiyyah R, Utomo AJ. Family matters: Demographic change and social spending in Indonesia. Bull Indonesia Econ Stud. 2016;52(2):133-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1211077

IB Spell. General Demographics. 2nd ed. Yogyaka: Student Library; 2016. p. 1-48.

Pranowo. The role of gender in decision making fisherman’s household in the city of Semarang Utara, Province of Central Java. J Sosek KP. 2018;7(1):113-9.