The Effectiveness of the Real-case Online-based Learning on Nursing Care Plan Self-efficacy

Wantonoro Wantonoro; Diyah Anita; Mamnuah Mamnuah; Tuan Van Nguyen

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8347

Authors

Wantonoro Wantonoro Department of Nursing, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-6427
Diyah Anita Department of Nursing, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mamnuah Mamnuah Department of Nursing, Universitas ‘Aisyiyah, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-660X
Tuan Van Nguyen Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Technology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7597-1141

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8347

Keywords:

Online real case, Mix methods, Nursing, COVID-19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online learning has become a new thing that is adapted and supports the learning process, including in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, various studies report that there are limitations to conduct the online learning.

AIM: The objective of the study was to identify the effectiveness of the real-case online-based learning in understanding the nursing care plan process and, self-efficacy from the students’ perspective.

METHODS: Mix methods; explanatory sequential designs. One-hundred and fifty-seven respondents participated in the quantitative approach (64 students in the intervention group and, 93 students in the control group). Six students among the quantitative approach were participated in the qualitative approach. Mann-Whitney’s statistical approach was used for the quantitative approach, while Colaizzi’s method of data analysis was used for the qualitative approach.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the control and treatment groups in the nursing care plan (p = 0.13) and student self-efficacy (p = 0.45). In addition, there were five themes identified by the students’ perspectives regarding the real case online learning, including; 1) opinions on learning, 2) the feelings experienced during the learning, 3) learning benefits, 4) learning barriers, and 5) expectations of learning.

CONCLUSION: The real case online learning provides a different atmosphere including more interesting class, interactive interaction with the patients directly and providing positive experience for the students in the form of seeing the real cases online. The infrastructure/facilities (internet availability and stability) are important factors in the online learning process. The real case online learning is recommended as an alternative of learning that is more interesting and interactive involving the patients, students, and direct supervisors. Further research on the learning process of nursing care with a mixed system; limited offline and online cases with real, comprehensive, and interdisciplinary approaches are recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Dewart G, Corcoran L, Thirsk L, Petrovic K. Nursing education in a pandemic: Academic challenges in response to COVID-19. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;92:104471-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471 PMid:32502723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104471

Ilankoon IMP, Kisokanth G, Warnakulasuriya SS. COVID-19: Impact on undergraduate nursing education in Sri Lanka. J Public Health Res. 2020;9(Suppl 1):1916. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2020.1916 PMid:33409248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2020.1916

Gaffney MK, Chargualaf KA, Ghosh S. COVID-19 disruption of nursing education and the effects on students’ academic and professional confidence. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(2):76-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000986 PMid:33587411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000986

Alqahtani N, Innab A, Bahari G. Virtual education during COVID-19: Exploring factors associated with E-learning satisfaction among saudi nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(2):E18-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000954 PMid:33234836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000954

Walsh JA. Switching strategies: Using telehealth as an innovative virtual simulation teaching method. Nurse Educ. 2020;45(6):330. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000908 PMid:32756264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000908

Konrad S, Fitzgerald A, Deckers C. Nursing fundamentals supporting clinical competency online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teach Learn Nurs. 2021;16(1):53-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.07.005 PMid:32837448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.07.005

Li W, Gillies R, He M, Wu C, Liu S, Gong Z, et al. Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9 PMid:33980228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9

Mamnuah M. Stress and efforts by students in learning during Covid-19 pandemic. J Aisyah. 2021;6:267-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v6i2.502

Norhidayah AA, Hamdoni KP. Coping style, anxiety level, organizational support, and work commitment of educators during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines: A mixed-methods study. Belitung Nurs J. 2021;7(4):267-76.

Ernawati E, Bratajaya CN. Senior nurses’ perceptions of essential soft skills for novice nurses in a private hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia: A phenomenological study. Belitung Nurs J. 2021;7(4):1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1549

Tyo MB, McCurry MK. An integrative review of clinical reasoning teaching strategies and outcome evaluation in nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;40(1):11-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000375 PMid:30095730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000375

Scheckel M. Designing courses and learning experiences. In: Teaching in Nursing: A Guide for Faculty. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. p. 159-85.

Servant VF, Schmidt HG. Revisiting foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Med Educ. 2016;50(7):698-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12803 PMid:27295470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12803

Sayyah M, Shirbandi K, Saki-Malehi A, Rahim F. Use of a problem-based learning teaching model for undergraduate medical and nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:691-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S143694

Wosinski J, Belcher AE, Dürrenberger Y, Allin AC, Stormacq C, Gerson L. Facilitating problem-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;60:67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.015

Akcaoglu M, Lee E. Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions. Vol. 17. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293

Weidlich J, Bastiaens TJ. Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;72:479-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016

Dowding D. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences John W. Creswell, Ann Carroll Klassen, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Katherine Clegg Smith for the office of behavioral and social sciences research; qualitative methods overview jo moriarty. Qual Soc Work. 2013;12(4):541-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013493540a

Leslie C, Marcella NS. Mixed Methods in Health Sciences Research: A Practical Primer. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2015.

Gunawan J. Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Belitung Nurs J. 2015;1(1):10-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4

Fatani TH. Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2 PMid:33129295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2

Klemenc-Ketis Z, Cagran B, Dinevski D. Evaluating the difference between virtual and paper-based clinical cases in family medicine undergraduate education. Adv Med. 2018;2018:1408450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1408450 PMid:29568779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1408450

Thapa P, Bhandari SL, Pathak S. Nursing students’ attitude on the practice of e-learning: A cross-sectional survey amid COVID-19 in Nepal. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253651 PMid:34166444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253651

Cullinan J, Flannery D, Harold J, Lyons S, Palcic D. The disconnected: COVID-19 and disparities in access to quality broadband for higher education students. Int J Educ Technol Higher Educ. 2021;18(1):26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1

Harefa EY, Simamora E, Hia GT. Description of Selt-efficasy Indonesian Nursing Students (Indonesia Language). Bachelor Thesis. Universitas Pelita Harapan; 2020.

Tiwari SK, Srivastava SP. Self-efficacy of online learning among nursing students during COVID-19 pandemic. 2021;8(9):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20213549

Moon H, Hyun HS. Nursing students’ knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8

Robb M. Self-efficacy with application to nursing education: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2012;47(3):166-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00267.x PMid:22861653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2012.00267.x

Zengin N, Pınar R, Akinci AC, Yildiz H. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for clinical evaluation scale in Turkish nursing students. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(7-8):976-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000954 PMid:23876212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12257

Stump GS, Husman J, Brem SK. The nursing student self-efficacy scale: Development using item response theory. Nurs Res. 2012;61(3):149-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e318253a750 PMid:22551989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e318253a750

Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol. 1993;28(2):117-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Duggleby W, Cooper D, Penz K. Hope, self-efficacy, spiritual well-being and job satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(11):2376-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05094.x PMid:19737323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05094.x

Lee TW, Ko YK. Effects of self-efficacy, affectivity and collective efficacy on nursing performance of hospital nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(4):839-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05244.x PMid:20423371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05244.x

Alavi NM. Self-efficacy in nursing students. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2014;3(4):e25881. https://doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal25881 PMid:25741520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal25881

Secco L, Bulman D, Wilson K. Pilot evaluation of a virtual clinical excursion (VCE) among senior nursing students: Part 2 qualitative perspectives and learning style. Can J Nurs Inf. 2012;7(4):1-8.