Strength of Polyether Ether Ketone Composite as a Major Connector Material for Removable Partial Dentures

Authors

  • Sherif Elsayed Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-5446
  • Dalia Ibrahim Sherief Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Mohamed Mohamed Selim Department of Physical Chemistry, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
  • Ghada Atef Alian Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8658

Keywords:

Polyetheretherketone, Major connector, Co-Cr alloy, Palatal strap, Fracture resistance

Abstract

PEEK composite was tested mechanically as a maxillary removable partial denture (RPD) framework material instead of cast cobalt chromium alloy. Methods: Partial edentulous upper jaw cast was scanned using structured-light 3D scanner, palatal strap (PS) designs for RPD were designed by a designing dental laboratory software. CAD/CAM machine fabricated PSs patterns using their designs’ STL software files. PSs were made from poly-ether-ether ketone (PEEK) reinforced by ceramic fillers using thermal injection press technique and Co-Cr alloy using centrifugal casting, each material group was subdivided into two subgroups according to storage conditions (stored and non-stored subgroups), storage took place in deionized water for about 180 days at 37.5 ± 2 o C. All specimens were subjected to fracture resistance test using universal testing machine then maximum compression load (MCL) result values were subjected to statistical analysis. PEEK composite specimens were scanned by field emission microscope (FEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy. Storage water of PEEK composite was analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Results: In either stored or non-stored subgroups of PEEK composite straps they showed significant lower mean MCL values than corresponding alloy subgroups (p=0.0001). FEM scanning showed fillers agglomerations in non-stored PEEK composite and their nearly absence from stored PEEK composite specimens. AAS detected Al element in PEEK composite storage water. Conclusion: Mechanically thermally injected ceramic reinforced PEEK composite could not replace cast Co-Cr alloy as PSs material for maxillary RPD. Biocompatibility concerns raised in this study due to suspected Al leaching and ceramic fillers dissolution from PEEK composite matrix.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, et al. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):273-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008 PMid:28343666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008

Al Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: A review of the literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(2):138-45. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.138 PMid:24843400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.138

Lee JC, Son YO, Pratheeshkumar P, Shi X. Oxidative stress and metal carcinogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(4):742-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.06.002 PMid:22705365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.06.002

Costa M, Klein CB. Toxicity and carcinogenicity of chromium compounds in humans. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36(2):155-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440500534032 PMid:16736941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440500534032

Vaicelyte A, Janssen C, Le Borgne M, Grosgogeat B. Cobalt-chromium dental alloys: Metal exposures, toxicological risks, CMR classification, and EU regulatory framework. Crystals. 2020;10(12 ):1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121151

Fueki K, Ohkubo C, Yatabe M, Arakawa I, Arita M, Ino S, et al. Clinical application of removable partial dentures using thermoplastic resin-Part I: Definition and indication of non-metal clasp dentures. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.12.002 PMid:24461323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.12.002

Ma R, Tang T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):5426-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15045426 PMid:24686515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15045426

Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The use of a modified poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(7):580-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12325 PMid:26216668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12325

Carr AB, Brown DT. Mccracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. p. 44.

Seo RS, Murata H, Hong G, Vergani CE, Hamada T. Influence of thermal and mechanical stresses on the strength of intact and relined denture bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(1):59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.007 PMid:16872932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.007

Takahashi Y, Yoshida K, Shimizu H. Fracture resistance of maxillary complete dentures subjected to long-term water immersion. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):1086-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00616.x PMid:22260149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00616.x

Polyzois GL, Andreopoulos AG, Lagouvardos PE. Acrylic resin denture repair with adhesive resin and metal wires: Effects on strength parameters. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(4):381-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90029-3 PMid:8642523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90029-3

Girao AV, Caputo G, Ferro MC. Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS),characterization and analysis of microplastics. In: Characterization and Analysis of Microplastics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2016.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2016.10.002

Lucchetti MC, Fratto G, Valeriani F, De Vittori E, Giampaoli S, Papetti P, et al. Cobalt-chromium alloys in dentistry: An evaluation of metal ion release. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):602-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.018 PMid:25979449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.002

Wataha JC. Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys: A review. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):223-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(00)80016-5 PMid:10668036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80016-5

Abhay SS, Ganapathy D, Veeraiyan DN, Ariga P, Heboyan A, Amornvit P, et al. Wear resistance, color stability and displacement resistance of milled PEEK crowns compared to zirconia crowns under stimulated chewing and high-performance aging. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(21):3761. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213761 PMid:34771318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213761

Bechir ES, Bechir A, Gioga C, Manu R, Burcea A. The advantages of biohpp polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. Mater Sci Appl. 2016;53(3):394-8.

Rosa LB, Bataglion C, Siéssere S, Palinkas M, Mestriner W Jr., de Freitas O, et al. Bite force and masticatory efficiency in individuals with different oral rehabilitations. Open J Stomatol. 2012;02(01):21-6. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2012.21004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2012.21004

Kuo MC, Tsai CM, Huang JC, Chen M. PEEK composites reinforced by nano-sized SiO2 and Al2O3 particulates. Mater Chem Phys. 2005;90(1):185-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.10.009

Ramana Reddy K, Parameswaran V, Sundaraiah K, Singh RK, Bhasker Rao KU, Iyengar NG. Poly-ether-ether-ketone composites reinforced with alumina nanoparticles: Processing and characterization. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2010;29(18):2771-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684409359217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684409359217

Goyal RK, Tiwari AN, Negi YS. Microhardness of PEEK/ ceramic micro- and nanocomposites: Correlation with Halpin – Tsai model. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;491(1-2):230-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.091

Goyal RK, Negi YS, Tiwari AN. High performance polymer composites on PEEK reinforced with aluminum oxide. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;100(6):4623-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.23083

Mohammed AA, Oleiwi JK, Al-Hassani ES. Influence of nanocermic on some properties of polyetheretherketone based biocomposites. Eng Technol J. 2020;38(part A,No.08):1126-36. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i8a.703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i8A.703

Domka L, Krysztafkiewicz A, Kozak M. Silane modified fillers for reinforcing polymers. Polym Polym Compos. 2002;10(7):541-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/096739110201000706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096739110201000706

Parvaiz MR, Mahanwar PA. Effect of coupling agent on the mechanical, thermal, electrical, rheological and morphological properties of polyetheretherketone composites reinforced with surface-modified mica. Polym – Plast Technol Eng. 2010;49(8):827-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602551003773080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03602551003773080

Rashidi AR, Wahit MU, Abdullah MR, Abdul Kadir MR. The effect of silane on the biomechanical properties of PEEK/HA composite. Adv Mater Res. 2015;1125(January 2016):426-31. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1125.426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1125.426

Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Muller WD. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1377-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.151 PMid:26361808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.151

Joseph S, Shertukade VV, Mahanwar PA, Bambole VA. Effect of concentration of mica and microsilica on particulate composites of poly(ethersulfone) and poly(ether-ether-ketone). J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2011;24(3):351-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705710391394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705710391394

Zhou B, Ji X, Sheng Y, Wang L, Jiang Z. Mechanical and thermal properties of poly-ether ether ketone reinforced with CaCO3. Eur Polym J. 2004;40(10):2357-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.019

Jakovac M, Jerolimov V. Application of spectrophotometry and ion chromatography for monitoring the chemical stability of dental ceramics in an acid solution. Acta Stomat Croat. 2002;36:93-6.

Krewski D, Yokel RA, Nieboer E, Borchelt D, Cohen J, Harry J, et al. Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2007;10 Suppl 1:1-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400701597766 PMid:18085482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400701597766

Downloads

Published

2022-03-21

How to Cite

1.
Elsayed S, Sherief DI, Selim MM, Alian GA. Strength of Polyether Ether Ketone Composite as a Major Connector Material for Removable Partial Dentures. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 21 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];10(D):229-37. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/8658