Philanthropic Institutions’ Perspectives Regarding Challenges in the Indonesian Health Sector: A Qualitative Study

Jodi Visnu; Christantie Effendy; Paschalis Maria Laksono; Laksono Trisnantoro

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.8716

Authors

Jodi Visnu The Center for Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Christantie Effendy Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Paschalis Maria Laksono Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Laksono Trisnantoro Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8716

Keywords:

Collaboration, Health philanthropy, Indirect costs, Partnership

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Indonesian Social Health Security Agency has a key role in improving the community’s quality of life by providing financial access to all citizens to fulfill basic health needs. The society has received government funding for basic health needs through direct costs. On the other hand, there are also indirect costs for non-medical needs that may potentially become problems for some people. The concept of philanthropy was developed and became a significant and concrete utility in responding to Indonesian health problems.

AIM: Our study aimed to explore challenges faced by the Indonesian philanthropic institutions in managing charitable giving to the health sector.

METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study to explore challenges faced by the Indonesian philanthropic institutions in managing charitable giving to the health sector.

RESULTS: As a result, we found that internal and external support and synchronous collaboration become a common theme of challenges in managing health philanthropy in Indonesia.

CONCLUSION: Cross-sectorial partnerships in the health sector might improve national welfare as we work toward achieving the sustainable development goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Meier BM. Human rights in the world health organization: Views of the director-general candidates. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):293-8. PMid:28630561

United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights; 2018. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. [last accessed on 2020 Jan 10].

Cashin C. Provider Payment Methods and Strategic Purchasing for UHC; 2017. Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258894/provider_payment_methods_fr_uhc.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 10].

BPJS Kesehatan. Situs Resmi BPJS Kesehatan; 2017. Available from: https://www.bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 10].

BPJS Kesehatan. Nilai Pancasila dalam Prinsip Gotong Royong JKN-KIS. Indonesia; 2017. Available from: https://www.bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/dmdocuments/12e7a44a59302cedf37cb9cdc92aecc5.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 10].

Trisnantoro L. Kebijakan Pembiayaan dan Fragmentasi Sistem Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2019.

Defisit BPJS Kesehatan Disebut Terjadi sejak Beroperasi; 2019. Available from: https://www.nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/12/02/06442341/defisit-bpjs-kesehatan-disebut-terjadi-sejak-beroperasi?_ga=2.9194038.260134478.1579503710-829095074.1497590399. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 31].

The World Bank Group. Current health expenditure (% of GDP) – Indonesia; 2021. Available from: https://www.data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?locations=ID. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 18].

World Health Organization. Costs and Cost Analysis. Analysing Health Sector Financing and Expenditure; 2009. Available from: https://www.who.int/hac/techguidance/tools/disrupted_sectors/module_06/en/index1.html. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 22].

Tajima-Pozo K, Oller MJ de C, Lewczuk A, Montañes-Rada F. Understanding the direct and indirect costs of patients with schizophrenia. F1000Res. 2015;4(182):1-9. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6699.1 PMid:26339474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6699.1

Presiden Republik Indonesia. Perseroan Terbatas. In: Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007; 2007. Available from: https://www.ojk.go.id/sustainable-finance/id/peraturan/undang-undang/Documents/5.UU-40-2007PERSEROAN TERBATAS.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 11].

Schuyt T, Bekkers R, Smit J. The philanthropy scale: A sociological perspective in measuring new forms of pro social behaviour. Soc Work Soc Int Online J. 2010;8(1):1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t57804-000

Sciortino R. Philanthrophy in Southeast Asia: Between charitable values, corporate, interests, and development aspirations. Austrian J South Asian Stud. 2017;10(2):139-63.

Schneider WH, Meslin EM, Daniken C. Health and philanthropy: Leveraging change. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2008;37(1):3S-5S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007310540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007310540

INFID. Sustainable Development Goals; 2017. Available from: https://www.sdg2030indonesia.org/page/1-tujuan-sdg. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 11].

Charities Aid Foundation. CAF World Giving Index 2018. London; 2018. Available from: https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/caf_wgi2018_report_webnopw_2379a_261018.pdf?sfvrsn=c28e9140_4. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 11].

Yuliani PA. Indonesia Tempati Peringkat Pertama Negara Paling Dermawan. Media Indonesia; 2018. https://www.mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/198071-indonesia-tempatiperingkat-pertama-negara-paling-dermawan. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 11].

Visnu J, Abdalla AS, Ainul AZ, Trisnantoro L. Berbagi Sehatkan Negeri: Laporan Pemetaan Lembaga Filantropi Kesehatan di Indonesia. Jakarta; 2020. Available from: http://www.ugm.id/bsn. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 09].

Iwannanda R, Sudarmiatin, Adiputra IW. Philanthropic corporate social responsibility: A case study. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2017;7(6):876-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3046

Cresswel JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. California: SAGE Publications; 2003.

Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc.,; 2009.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 PMid:17872937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 PMid:16204405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 PMid:14769454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

Grantmakers in Health. The field of health philanthropy. In: Knowledge to Action. Washington DC: Grantmakers in Health; 2007. p. 7-22. Available from: https://www.gih.org/files/usrdoc/Knowledge_to_Action_2007.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 12].

Shaw-Taylor Y. Nongovernment philanthropic spending on public health in The United States. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(1):58-62. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302888 PMid:26562104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302888

Hadley C. The power of giving. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(8):751-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400213 PMid:15289821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400213

Scherer SC. Organizational Identity and Philanthropic Institutions. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh; 2017. p. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21266

SDGs Center Universitas Gadjah Mada. Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing UGM Held The First National Forum on Health Philanthropy. Yogyakarta; 2020. Available from: https://www.sustainabledevelopment.ugm.ac.id/2020/07/21/faculty-of-medicine-public-health-and-nursing-ugm-held-thefirst-national-forum-on-health-philanthropy/. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 07].

King D. How Religion Motivates People to Give and Serve. The Conversation; 2017. Available from: https://www.theconversation.com/how-religion-motivates-people-to-giveand-serve-81662. [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 12].

Haddad FD. Does Religion Influence Philanthropy? NonProfit PRO; 2018. Available from: https://www.nonprofitpro.com/post/religion-influence-philanthropy/. [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 12].

van Aaken D, Buchner F. Religion and CSR: A systematic literature review. J Bus Econ. 2020;90:917-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00977-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00977-z

Bekkers R. Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality. Soc Psychol Q. 2006;69(4):349-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900404

Guo C, Webb NJ, Abzug R, Peck LR. Religious affiliation, religious attendance, and participation in social change organizations. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2013;42(1):34-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012473385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012473385

United Nations. THE 17 GOALS. Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2015. Available from: https://www.sdgs.un.org/goals. [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 12].

International Council for Science. Health and the Sustainable Development Goals: An Urban Systems Perspective; 2013. Available from: https://www.sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/8940606ICSU.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 May 03].

Shaw S, Allen JB. “To be a business and to keep our humanity”: A critical management studies analysis of the relationship between a funder and nonprofit community organizations. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2009;20(1):83-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.242

McDaniel J. Indonesia, modernity and some problems of religious adaptation. Wacana. 2014;15(2):314-35. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v15i2.406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v15i2.406

Dymitrow M, Ingelhag K, editors. Anatomy of a 21st-Century Sustainability Project: the Untold Story. Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures and Chalmers University of Technology; 2019. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1406043/FULLTEXT01.pdf#page=223. [last accessed on 2021 Dec 12].

Muhyi HA, Chan A, Sukoco I, Herawaty T. The penta helix collaboration model in developing centers of flagship industry in Bandung City. Rev Integr Bus Econ Res. 2017;6(1):412-7. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbg.2017.085930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2017.085930

Kemp S. DIGITAL 2021: INDONESIA. Kepios; 2021. Available from: https://www.datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-indonesia. [Last accessed on 2021 Dec 12].

Rushton M. Why are nonprofits exempt from the corporate income tax? Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2007;36(4):662-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006298956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006298956

Ma J. Funding nonprofits in a networked society: Toward a network framework of government support. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2020 ;31(2):233-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21426