Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass with Follow-up of Weight Loss and Metabolic Impact

Authors

  • Ahmad Abdalaziz Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Mohamed D. Sarhan Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Hesham Ahmed Abou-Eisha Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ahmed Abdelsalam Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ahmed Saqr Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Ehab Fathy Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8989

Keywords:

Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass, Weight loss, Comorbidities

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery has been an effective safe management for severe obesity. The newly developed single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass has shown efficacy as a functional as well as mechanical restrictive bariatric procedure, with a neuroendocrine modulation effect. SASI bypass is still an investigational procedure, hence, more evidence is needed till it is declared as a standard bariatric procedure by the IFSO. Aim of the study: The current work aimed to describe our experience regarding the technical steps, the efficacy and the short-term outcome of SASI bypass procedure in patients with severe obesity. Patients and methods: Forty seven patients with severe obesity underwent SASI bypass procedure. They were followed till 1 year postoperatively. The weight loss, comorbidities and laboratory changes were assessed. Results: Patients evaluation at the 1-year postoperative follow up revealed a mean %TWL of 37.55 ± 6.17 and a mean %EBWL of 76.21 ± 9.8. The remission rates of T2DM, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were 85.7%, 94.7% and 89.66%, respectively, with statistically high significant differences between the preoperative and 1-year postoperative comorbidities rate. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that only the preoperative HbA1C remained in the model predicting the %TWL, and the preoperative BMI was the remaining factor in the model predicting the %EBWL in the study patients. Conclusion: The present study adds a new evidence to the promising outcome of the newly introduced SASI bypass procedure. After one year, the study patients showed excellent weight loss and comorbidities remission together with acceptable major complication rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Chua MW. The invisible and insidious enemy. Obes Surg. 2021;31(12):5460-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05550-3 PMid:34215974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05550-3

Salman M, Mikhail H, Abdelsalam A, Abdallah A, Elshafey E, Abouelregal T, et al. Acceleration of gastric emptying and improvement of GERD outcome after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in non-diabetic obese patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(7):2676-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04547-8 PMid:32200446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04547-8

Salman A, Salman M, Sarhan M, Maurice K, Tag El-din M, Youssef A, et al. Changes of urinary cytokines in non-diabetic obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:825-31. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s302418 PMid:33732012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S302418

Bhandari M, Fobi MA, Buchwald JN, Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization (BMSS) Working Group. Standardization of bariatric metabolic procedures: World consensus meeting statement. Obes Surg. 2019;29(Suppl 4):309-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04032-x PMid:31297742

Santoro S, Velhote MC, Malzoni CE, Milleo FQ, Klajner S, Campos FG. Preliminary results from digestive adaptation: A new surgical proposal for treating obesity, based on physiology and evolution. Sao Paulo Med J. 2006;124(4):192-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802006000400004 PMid:17086299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802006000400004

Mahdy T, Gado W, Alwahidi A, Schou C, Emile SH. Sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity: A retrospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1579-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05159-y PMid:33409970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05159-y

Catheline JM, Fysekidis M, Dbouk R, Boschetto A, Bihan H, Reach G, et al. Weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy in super superobesity. J Obes. 2012;2012:e959260. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/959260 PMid:22888410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/959260

Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, Titchner RL, Gourash W, Schauer PR. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256(2):262-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31825fe905 PMid:22791102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fe905

Abdeen G, Le Roux CW. Mechanism underlying the weight loss and complications of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):410-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1945-7 PMid:26530712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1945-7

Kothari SN, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Baker MT, Grover BT. Long-term (>10-year) outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(6):972-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.011 PMid:28223086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.011

O’Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, Skinner S, Burton P, Smith A, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0 PMid:30293134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0

English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):259-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.013 PMid:29370995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.013

Surve A, Cottam D, Richards C, Medlin W, Belnap L. A matched cohort comparison of long-term outcomes of roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1438-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05131-w PMid:33201398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05131-w

Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MC, Malzoni CE, Klajner S, Castro LP, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: A potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obesity. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):104-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31825370c0 PMid:22609843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825370c0

Mahdy T, Al wahedi A, Schou C. Efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass for Type-2 diabetic morbid obese patients: Gastric bipartition, a novel metabolic surgery procedure: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;34:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.018 PMid:27545956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.018

Romero RJ, Colorado-Subizar R, De Uriarte-Lorente M, Barradas-Lagunes M, Bravo-De Ávila P, Romero-Espejo JJ. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI Bypass): Short-term outcomes and concerns. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):2339-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05145-4 PMid:33405181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05145-4

Kermansaravi M, Kabir A, Pazouki A. 1-year follow-up of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in morbid obese patients: Efficacy and concerns. Obes Surg. 2020;30(11):4286-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04781-0 PMid:32681291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04781-0

Emile SH, Madyan A, Mahdy T, Elshobaky A, Elbanna HG, Abdel-Razik MA. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: A case-matched multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(2):652-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w PMid:32072282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w

Bhandari M, Fobi MA, Buchwald JN, Abbass A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Alamo M, et al. Standardization of bariatric metabolic procedures: World consensus meeting statement. Obes Surg. 2019;29(Suppl 4):309-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04032-x PMid:31297742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04032-x

Mahdy T, Emile SH, Madyan A, Schou C, Alwahidi A, Ribeiro R, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass for patients with morbid obesity: A multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):837-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04296-3 PMid:31734889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04296-3

Pereferrer FS, López AM, Espelta MV, Carceller ER, Blasco SB, Vilalta FB, et al. Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: A randomised study. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1254-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2454-z PMid:27995517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2454-z

Khalaf M, Hamed H. Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass: Hopes and concerns after a two-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):667-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04945-y PMid:32844276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04945-y

Madyan A, Emile SH, Abdel-Razik MA, Ellithy R, Elbanna HG, Elshobaky A. Laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass for patients with morbid obesity: Technical description and short-term outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020;30:e13. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000763

Salama TM, Sabry K, Ghamrini YE. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass: New step in the evolution of bariatric surgeries. J Investig Surg. 2017;30(5):291-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1241841 PMid:27768400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2016.1241841

Klop B, Elte JW, Cabezas MC. Dyslipidemia in obesity: Mechanisms and potential targets. Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1218-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041218 PMid:23584084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5041218

Patalay M, Lofgren IE, Freake HC, Koo SI, Fernandez ML. The lowering of plasma lipids following a weight reduction program is related to increased expression of the LDL receptor and lipoprotein lipase. J Nutr. 2005;135(4):735-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.735 PMid:15795426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.735

Emile SH, Elfeki H. Nutritional deficiency after sleeve gastrectomy: A comprehensive literature review. EMJ Gastroenterol. 2017;6(1):99-105.

Elbanna H, Ghnnam W, Negm A, Youssef T, Emile S, El Metwally T, et al. Impact of preoperative body mass index on the final outcome after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016;32(4):238-43. https://doi.org/10.5152/ucd.2016.3275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2016.3275

Ortega CB, Lee HJ, Portenier D, Guerron AD, Tong J. Preoperative hemoglobin A1c predicts postoperative weight loss following bariatric surgery in patients with diabetes. Diabetes. 2018;67:2045. https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-2045-p DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/db18-2045-P

Downloads

Published

2022-04-12

How to Cite

1.
Abdalaziz A, Sarhan MD, Abou-Eisha HA, Abdelsalam A, Saqr A, Fathy E. Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass with Follow-up of Weight Loss and Metabolic Impact. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 12 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];10(B):1325-31. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/8989

Most read articles by the same author(s)