Description of Clinical Facial Analysis of Minangkabau Ethnics Students Using Rhinobase Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9171Keywords:
Facial analysis, Minangkabau, Rhinobase softwareAbstract
BACKGROUND: Facial analysis is influenced by several factors including age, gender, race, body shape, and personality. The anatomical characteristics of Asians are highly varied. The differences of these characteristics have become a reference for several researchers to get the basic value of each individual facial profile from certain regions or countries.
AIM: To determine the clinical facial analysis of students from the Minangkabau ethnic group.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive-analytic study with a cross-sectional design was carried out on 100 students of the Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, ethnic Minangkabau aged 18 to 29 years who met the criteria. Facial analysis using Rhinobase Software, the results obtained were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22
RESULTS: This study showed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) in 8 of 21 facial anthropometric parameters. Those parameters were LFH, SM, Mf-Mf, Al-Al, MCA, NT, tip Powell projection, and mentolabial sulcus.
CONCLUSION :
The vertical facial assessment revealed that men have a longer lower facial height than women. The horizontal facial assessment found that men have a wider bridge of nose and nostrils than women.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Anand S, Tripathi S, Chopra A, Khaneja K, Agarwal S. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face and their correlation to phi among Indians in Moradabad population: A survey. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(2):125-30. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155033 PMid:26929498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155033
Nguyen MS, Saag M, Le VN, Nguyen TT, Nguyen BB, Jagomägi T. The golden proportion in facial soft-tissues of Vietnamese females. Stomatologija. 2016;18(3):80-5. PMid:28386050
Meneghini F, Biondi P. Clinical Facial Analysis: Elements Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27228-8
Meruane M, Ayala MF, Garcıa-Huidobro MA, Andrades P. Reliability of nasofacial analysis using rhinobase software. Aesth Plast Surg. 2015;40(1):149-56. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-135553 PMid:26530483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0569-6
Ridley MB, Vanhook SM. Aesthetic facial proportions. In: Papel ID, Frodel JL, Holt GR, Larrabee WF, Nachlas NE, Park SS, editors. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4th ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publisher; 2016. p. 119-33. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-135553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-135553
Menon A. Reconstructing race and gender in American cosmetic surgery. Ethn Racial Stud. 2016;40(4):597-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1206590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1206590
Jang YJ. Asian rhinoplasty. In: Papel ID, Frodel JL, Holt GR, Larrabee WF, Nachlas NE, Park SS, editors. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4th ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publisher; 2016. p. 619-37. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-135587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-135587
Gao Y, Niddam J, Noel W, Hersant B, Meningaud J. Comparison of aesthetic facial criteria between Caucasian and East Asian female populations: An esthetic surgeon’s perspective. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100064 PMid:27630035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.007
Marini MI, Angrosidy H, Kurniawan A, Margaretha MS. The anthropological analysis of the nasal morphology of Dayak Kenyah population in Indonesia as a basic data for forensic identification. Transl Res Anat. 2020;19:100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100064
Irsa R, Syaifullah S, Tjong DH. Variation of cephalometry in multiple tribes in West Sumatra. J Bio U A. 2013;2(2):130-7.
Sheikh MA, Chowdhury GM, Jolly F, Zaman M. An anthropometric evaluation of morphological facial height in Bangladeshi young adult. J Armed Forces Med Coll Bangladesh. 2014;10(2):33-8. https://doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v10i2.25919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v10i2.25919
Elfiah U, Putri IL, Hutagalung MR, Perdanakusuma DS, Kosbandriati PT. Variables of Indonesian facial antropometry and cephalometry as database in reconstruction of maxillofacial trauma. J Emerg. 2011;1(1):6-12.
Erlangga MH. Anthropometry and Face Analysis using Rhinobase Software on Java Woman in Jakarta. Jakarta: University of Indonesia; 2006.
Odias RR. Face Analysis of Batak Woman. Medan: University of North Sumatra; 2008.
Punagi AQ, Julianita J. Photometric analysis of the faces of tribes in South Sulawesi and West Sulawesi. Maj Kedokt Indon. 2008;58(10):370-6.
Asthuta AR, Pradiptha IP. Anthropometric study of nasal index of Bali Aga population. Oto Rhino Laryngol Indonesiana. 2019;49(1):35. https://doi.org/10.32637/orli.v49i1.273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32637/orli.v49i1.273
Winkler A, Wudel M. Preoperative evaluation and facial analysis in facial plastic surgery. In: Johnson JT, Rosen CA, editors. Bailey’s Head and Neck Surgery Otolaryngology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014. p. 2757-71.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Al Hafiz Djosan, Dolly Irfandy, Jacky Munilson, Hafni Bachtiar, Ricko Mariza Putra, Latifah Hanum (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0