Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment Criteria for Adenomyosis Diagnostic: A Case Report

Authors

  • Muhammad Rusda Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Medical Faculty, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-6838
  • Reni Hayati Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Medical Faculty, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9263

Keywords:

Adenomyosis, MUSA, Ultrasound, Menstrual Pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND : The MUSA (Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment) statement is a consensus statement on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe and report the sonographic features of the myometrium using gray-scale sonography, color/power Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. MUSA Adenomyosis ultrasound features : Asymmetrical thickening, fan shape shadowing, cyst, hyperechoic island, Echogenic sub endometrial lines and buds, trans lesion vascularity, Irregular junctional zone, Interrupted junctional zone. Classification and descriptions of the MUSA criteria for adenomyosis are presented : location, classification (diffuse/focal), cystic, layer involvement (type), extent, size of the lesion. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Eisenberg VH, Arbib N, Schiff E, Goldenberg M, Seidman DS, Soriano D. Sonographic signs of adenomyosis are prevalent in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis and may suggest a higher risk of infertility. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8967803. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8967803 PMid:29098162

Gracia M, Carmona F. Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. In: Integrated Approach To Obstetrics And Gynaecology. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2016. p. 121-8.

Krentel H, Cezar C, Becker S, Sardo AD, Tanos V, Wallwiener M, et al. From Clinical symptoms to MR imaging: Diagnostic steps in adenomyosis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1514029. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1514029 PMid:29349064

Puente JM, Alcázar JL, Martinez-Ten P, Bermejo C, Troncoso MT, García-Velasco JA. Interobserver agreement in the study of 2D and 3D sonographic criteria for adenomyosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2017;9(3):211-5.

Li JJ, Chung JP, Wang S, Li TC, Duan H. The investigation and management of adenomyosis in women who wish to improve or preserve fertility. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6832685. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6832685 PMid:29736395

Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-283. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17242.1 PMid:30918629

Capezzuoli T, Vannuccini S, Fantappiè G, Orlandi G, Rizzello F, Coccia ME, et al. Ultrasound findings in infertile women with endometriosis: evidence of concomitant uterine disorders. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(9):808-12. https://doi.org/10.108 0/09513590.2020.1736027 PMid:32133885

Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, et al. A sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis: A consensus statement from the morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;53(5):576-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19096 PMid:29790217

Downloads

Published

2022-03-17

How to Cite

1.
Rusda M, Hayati R. Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment Criteria for Adenomyosis Diagnostic: A Case Report. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 17 [cited 2022 Jul. 1];10(T7):20-2. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/9263

Most read articles by the same author(s)