Effect of Er,Cr: YSGG Laser on Bonding of Laminate Veneers using CAD/CAM (In Vitro Study)

Sohaila Ali; Amina Zaki; Rami Maher; Tarek Harhash

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.9356

Authors

Sohaila Ali Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, MSA University, 6th of October City, Egypt
Amina Zaki Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Rami Maher Department of Removal Prosthodontics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Tarek Harhash Department ofDental Laser Application, National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9356

Keywords:

Ceramics, Laminates, Laser, Bond strength

Abstract

AIM: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength after bonding between porcelain laminate veneers and the tooth surface using different etching methods

METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were used and prepared for receiving Enamic laminate veneers. Specimens were divided into two groups (n = 15), according to the surface treatment protocol. The specimens were sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3 for 20 s; 2 bar pressure was maintained for air abrasion. Distribution of groups was as follow G1: Prepared enamel surface treatment of each tooth was according to the manufacturer’s instructions. G2: The prepared enamel surface of each tooth was subjected to Erbium,Chromium-Doped: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, and Garnet laser application. Light cured adhesive resin cement was applied to fitting surface of each ceramic specimen. To simulate thermal aging, the samples were subjected to 5000 thermal cycling in a thermocycler. By dividing the failure load (N) by the bonding area (mm²), debonding loads were calculated as shear stress (MPa). Numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation values. They were explored for normality by checking the data distribution using Shapiro–Wilk test. Data showed parametric distribution and were analyzed using independent t-test. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 within all tests. Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical analysis software version 4.1.2 for Windows.

RESULTS: Group (II) (15.84 ± 3.09) had significantly higher mean value than group (I) (13.69 ± 2.36) (t = 2.15, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, it was revealed that the laser surface treatment for tooth substrate plays a significant role in increasing the shear bond strength of laminate veneers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Bhattacharjee D, Sharma K, Sahu R, Neha K, Kumari A, Rai A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with self-etch primer/adhesive and conventional etch/primer and adhesive system. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13 Suppl 2:S1168-73. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1649 PMid:35017950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1649

Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: The effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(6):531-40. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33198 PMid:25516881

Martínez-Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG, Santana- Penín UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er: YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(3):280-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108600 PMid:11005900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108600

Gökçe B. Bond Strengths of Full Ceramic Materials to Tooth Surfaces Prepared with Different Methods. Dissertation, Turkey: Ege University; 2004.

Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Influence of Er: YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent. 2006;34(3):245-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.005 PMid:16153764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.009

Ritzberger C, Apel E, Höland W, Peschke A, Rheinberger V. Properties and clinical application of three types of dental glass-ceramics and ceramics for CAD-CAM technologies. Mater (Basel). 2010;3(6):3700-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3063700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3063700

Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):603-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.032 PMid:25842099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011

Kellesarian SV, Malignaggi VR, Aldosary KM, JavedF. Laser-assisted removal of all ceramic fixed dental prostheses: A comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):216-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12360 PMid:29282849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12360

Sari T, Tuncel I, Usumez A, Gutknecht N. Transmission of Er: YAG laser through different dental ceramics. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3611 PMid:24328609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3611

Burnett LH Jr., Shinkai RS, de Eduardo CP. Tensile bond strength of a one-bottle adhesive system to indirect composites treated with Er: YAG laser, air abrasion, or fluoridric acid. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22(4):351-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.351 PMid:15345180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.351

Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(2):98-103. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.98 PMid:23755333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.98

Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Suzuki N, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Analysis of surface roughness of enamel and dentin after Er,Cr: YSGG laser irradiation. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001;19(6):297-303. https://doi.org/10.1089/104454701753342749 PMid:11776447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/104454701753342749

Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran S. Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(Suppl 2):S25-30. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2598 PMid:20950189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2598

Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Kirmali O, Kapdan A. Shear bond strength of a self-etched resin cement to an indirect composite: Effect of different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(3):405-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151783 PMid:25772927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151783

Rechmann P, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC. Laser all-ceramic crown removal and pulpal temperature--a laboratory proof-of-principle study. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(8):2087-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1738-1 PMid:25782432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1738-1

Van As G. Erbium lasers in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(4):1017-59, 8. https://doi.org./10.1016/j.cden.2004.06.001 PMid:15464563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.06.001

Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Morimoto S. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(1):31-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1488 PMid:23342345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1488

Gresnigt MM, Özcan M, van den Houten ML, Schipper L, Cune MS. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Dent Mater. 2016;32(5):607-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.004 PMid:26935018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.004

Öztürk E, Bolay Ş, Hickel R, Ilie N. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems. J Dent. 2013;41(2):97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.005 PMid:22521701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.005

Farias-Neto A, de Medeiros FC, Vilanova L, Chaves MS, de Araújo JJ. Tooth preparation for ceramic veneers: When less is more. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):156-164. PMid:31061996

Wong J, Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Baruth AG, Barkmeier WW, Johnson EA, et al. Enamel etching for universal adhesives: Examination of enamel etching protocols for optimization of bonding effectiveness. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):80-91. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-275-l PMid:31226005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/18-275-L

Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Allegretti J, Poggio C. Comparison of shear bond strength of universal adhesives on etched and nonetched enamel. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(1):e78-83. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000261 PMid:26952584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000261

Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, et al. Influence of duration of phosphoric acid pre-etching on bond durability of universal adhesives and surface free-energy characteristics of enamel. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(4):377-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12284 PMid:27315775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12284

International Standard Organization. Dentistry-Testing of Adhesion to Tooth Structure. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard Organization; 2015. p. 12.

Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens. Biomater Investig Dent. 20209;7(1):16-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415 275.2019.1709470 PMid:32128509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470

Moghaddas MJ, Mohammadipour HS, Daluyi RA, Nia AJ. The effect of lithium disilicate ceramic thickness and translucency on shear bond strength of light-cured resin cement. J Dent Mater Tech. 2017;6(3):108-16. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.208762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.208762

Kiomarsi N, Saburian P, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Hashemikamangar SS. Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(8):e945-51. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53721 PMid:28936282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53721

Alkhurays M, Alqahtani F. Influence of different luting cements on the shear bond strength of pretreated lithium disilicate materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(9):1056-60. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2641 PMid:31797829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2641

Tam LE, McComb D. Shear bond strengths of resin luting cements to laboratory-made composite resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(3):314-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90256-v PMid:1800726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90256-V

Fuentes MV, Ceballos L, González-López S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(3):717-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0752-y PMid:22619093

Mirzaei M, Yasini E, Tavakoli A, Chiniforush N. Effect of different powers of Er,Cr: YSGG laser treatment on surface morphology of microhybride composite resin: Scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6(2):62-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0752-y PMid:25987970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0752-y