Pricing and Phasing of In Vitro Fertilization Services in Republic of Macedonia

Authors

  • Marija Seistrajkova Department of Gynecology, RE-MEDIKA General Hospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5693-2817
  • Gligor Dimitrov Department of Gynecology, RE-MEDIKA General Hospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia image/svg+xml
  • Zoran Petanovski Department of Gynecology, RE-MEDIKA General Hospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia image/svg+xml
  • Srebra Iljovska Department of Gynecology, RE-MEDIKA General Hospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9751

Keywords:

In vitro fertilization, Pricing, Health services

Abstract

Introduction: In vitro fertilization (IVF) services in North Macedonia are mainly provided in private hospitals. The expenses for this service are covered by the HIF, by issuance of a voucher to the patients. One voucher is for one IVF cycle. Price of the voucher was determined in 2012 and specified protocols for provision of the service were set. Since then, the price was not revised or adjusted. Objective of this research is to adjust the price for IVF services in the country, based on existing national protocols and in accordance to the realistic costs.

Materials and Methods: Data from RE-MEDIKA’s electronic system for patients’ medical information (BIRPIS) was extracted. Information was related to patients who undergo the procedure covered by the Health Insurance Fund (HIF) - voucher. For defining direct costs, internal data from the hospital was used and adjusted. For defining indirect costs, data for overhead expenditures of the hospital was adjusted. Description of costs was made in accordance with the national protocol for IVF. Tables (excel spread sheets) used for the calculation are developed by the HIF.  

Results: The process of IVF was divided in three consecutive phases: phase 1- induction, phase 2 - fertilization and phase 3 - embryo transfer (ET). Each phase was priced accordingly. If all three phases are finished and ET is performed, the final full price for one IVF cycle - voucher is about 104,000 Macedonian denars (about 1,700 Euros).

Conclusion: We suggest introducing of phasing for the IVF process related to payment per phases’ finalization, where the next phase follows consequently. This phasing enables the patients to understand the procedures and the progress of the process; enables doctors to follow up the finalization and successfulness of the procedure; and gives the payer (buyer of the service, HIF) complete overview of the procedure and payment for each phase separately. Thus, success or failure of the entire process in specific phases can be monitored and evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Health Insurance Fund. Yearly Report for 2019. Macedonian: Health Insurance Fund; 2020. Available from: from: https://www.fzo.org.mk/WBStorage/Files/GODISEN%202019%20.pdf [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 20].

Health Insurance Fund. Biomedical Helped Fertilization (BHF). Macedonian: Health Insurance Fund; 2020. Available from: https://www.fzo.org.mk/default.asp?section=dogovori&tipDog=11 [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 20].

Health Insurance Fund. Formulary 4-protocol for BHF. Macedonian: Health Insurance Fund; 2020. Available from: https://www.fzo.org.mk/WBStorage/Files/Protokol%20za%20BPO%2003.05.2018.pdf [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 20].

Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, Wiley M. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. In: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. United Kingdom: Open University Press; 2011.

Granberg M, Wikland M, Hamberger L. Financing of IVF/ET in the Nordic countries. Acta Obset Gyncol Scand. 1998;77(1):63-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770114.x PMid:9492721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016349808565814

Collins JA, Bustillo M, Visscher RD, Lawrence LD. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Fertil Steril 1995;64(3):538-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57789-9 PMid:7641907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57789-9

Collins J. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19(3):279-90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-18047 PMid:11679909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-18047

Maheshwari A, Scotland G, Bell J, McTavish A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Direct health services costs of providing assisted reproduction in older women. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):527-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.115 PMid:19261279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.115

Neuman PJ. Should health insurance cover IVF? issues and options. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997;22(5):1215-39. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-22-5-1215 PMid:9394246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-22-5-1215

Hidelbaugh DA, Thompson IE, Berger MJ. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(9):570-4. PMid:9336753

Mol BW, Bonsel GJ, Collins JA, Wiegerinck MA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73(4):748-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00610-x PMid:10731536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00610-X

Suchartwatnachai C, Wongkularb A, Srisombut C, Choktanasiri W, Chinsomboon S, Rojanasakul A. Cost-effectiveness of IVF in women 38 years and older. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;69(2):143-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00215-5 PMid:10802082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00215-5

Downloads

Published

2022-09-03

How to Cite

1.
Seistrajkova M, Dimitrov G, Petanovski Z, Iljovska S. Pricing and Phasing of In Vitro Fertilization Services in Republic of Macedonia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 3 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];10(E):1635-8. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/9751

Issue

Section

Public Health Disease Control

Categories