Factor Analysis of Interteam Collaboration Process for Family Planning Program (Longitudinal Prospective Time Series Design)

Anif Prasetyorini; Thinni Nurul Rochmah; Fendy Suhariadi; Achmad Djunawan; Serlly Drastyana

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.9929

Authors

Anif Prasetyorini Doctoral Program, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Hospital Administration, College of Health Sciences, Soetomo Hospital Foundation, Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1130-7326
Thinni Nurul Rochmah Department of Health Administration and Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; The Airlangga Centre for Health Policy Research Group, Surabaya, Indonesia
Fendy Suhariadi Doctoral in Human Resources Development, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Pscychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
Achmad Djunawan Hospital Administration, College of Health Sciences, Soetomo Hospital Foundation, Surabaya, Indonesia
Serlly Drastyana Hospital Administration, College of Health Sciences, Soetomo Hospital Foundation, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9929

Keywords:

Interteam, Collaboration, Time series, Program

Abstract

Background. The success of Family Planning (FP) program is strongly determined by a collaboration process of two organizations responsible in managing the program. There has not any collaboration concept discussing the program within team level but belonging to different organizations.

Objective. To conduct factor analysis of interteam collaboration process in cross-organization for family planning.

Methods. This was a quantitative study with a longitudinal prospective time series design conducted at the public health center and the family planning extension worker team in Lamongan. Interteam collaboration data were obtained by questionnaires for three months and analyzed by factor analysis utilizing SPSS program.

Results. Factor analysis in interteam collaboration resulted in KMO value and Bartlett’s test > 0.5 with 0.000 significance and MSA value in Anti Image Metrics > 0.5. The result of variable extraction process and factor rotation, with eigen value was 1.661. The cumulative total variety value was 83.057%. Shared value (shared structural dimensions and shared team autonomy) and mutual benefit indicators could explain interteam collaboration variables.

Conclusion. This study demonstrated that interteam collaboration process was an three factor, effort for shared structural dimensions and shared team autonomy process by considering mutual benefit of interteam belonging to different organizations.

Keyword: interteam, collaboration, time series, program

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Timur 2019. Dinas Kesehat: Provinsi Jawa Tengah; 2020. p. 1-123.

Satriyandari Y, Quasimah Y, Fitriahadi E, Suryaningsih EK. Investigating the factors of contraception use among female sex workers. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10(G):25-32. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.7376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.7376

Ernawati H, Mas’udah AF, Emilia O, Lusmilasari L, Isroin L, Verawati M. The use of contraception and adolescent fertility in Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9:168-71. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7096

Brahmana IB, Majdawati A, Inayati I. The effectiveness of postpartum IUD compared to interval IUD in aisyiyah hospital Klaten. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;9(T5):103-8. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7848

Fajarningtiyas BN, Sulistiawan D, Naibaho MM, Arifa RF. Pattern and determinant of contraceptive use among women in indonesia from 2007 to 2017: Evidence from demographic and health survey. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9:1363-70. https://doi./org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7417

Mahalia LD, Supriyanto S. The role of cultural capital in strengthening the relationship between need and demand for contraceptive devices and drugs in several cultural areas in Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(E):1036-40. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.7039

Rahmadani S, Fatiah MS, Wahyunita VD, Kristianto J, Mulyo GP. The dominant factors affecting the low participation of young women ever married in the family planning program (KB) in Papua Province (2017 IDHS data analysis). Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10:411-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8187

Osman A, Hoffman A, Moore S, Van der Spuy Z. Reproductive knowledge and use of contraception among women with diabetes. S Afr Med J. 2015;105(9):760-4. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJnew.8170 PMid:26428976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJnew.8170

Nene Z, Hofmeyr GJ, Patel M, Panday M, Rees H, Makua M, et al. Changes to the world health organization guideline on hormonal contraceptive eligibility for women at high risk of HIV: South African perspective and response. South Afr Med J. 2018;108(8):629-31. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i8.13160 PMid:30182875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i8.13160

Whitford AB, Lee SY, Yun T, Jung CS. Collaborative behavior and the performance of government agencies. Int Public Manag J. 2010;13(4):321-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1096749 4.2010.529378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.529378

Ward KD, Varda DM, Epstein D, Lane B. Institutional factors and processes in interagency collaboration: The case of FEMA corps. Am Rev Public Adm. 2018;48(8):852-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017745354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017745354

Sanders NR, Premus R. Modeling the relationship between firm it capability, collaboration, and performance. J Bus Logist. 2005;26(1):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00192.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00192.x

Kahn KB. Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. J Prod Innov Manag. 1996;13(2):137-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00110-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1320137

Garg KC, Padhi P. A Study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics. 2001;51(2):415-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012709919544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012709919544

Audet M, Roy M. Using strategic communities to foster inter-organizational collaboration. J Organ Chang Manag. 2016;29(6):878-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0231

Ada YA. How Does Interorganizational Collaboration Work? Examining Interorganizational Collaboration Among Human Services Non Profits. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2013.

Karlsson M, Garvare R, Zingmark K, Nordström B. Organizing for sustainable inter-organizational collaboration in health care processes. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(2):241-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1638760 PMid:31329471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1638760

Thomson AM, Perry JL. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(1):20-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x

Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(Suppl 1):44-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

Leufkens AS, Noorderhaven NG. Learning to collaborate in multi-organizational projects. Int J Proj Manag. 20411;29(4):432-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.004

Torfing J. Collaborative innovation in the Public sector: The argument. Public Manag Rev. 2018;21(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Cooper M, Evans Y, Pybis J. Interagency collaboration in children and young people’s mental health: A systematic review of outcomes, facilitating factors and inhibiting factors. Child Care Health Dev. 2016;42(3):325-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12322 PMid:26860960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12322

Cohen G. Cultural fragmentation as a barrier to interagency collaboration: A qualitative examination of texas law enforcement officers’ perceptions. Am Rev Public Adm. 2018;48(8):886-901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017744659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017744659

Kousgaard MB, Scheele CE, Vrangbæk K. Inter-sectoral collaboration in municipal health centres: A multi-site qualitative study of supporting organizational elements and individual drivers. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4196 PMid:31244563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4196

Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M. The 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034 PMid:19879711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034

Sagar AH, Siddik MA, Hasan R. The determinants of risk-sharing strategies of food-retailers: A study on Chittagong, Bangladesh. Int J Financ Res. 2020;11(6):337-47. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n6p337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n6p337

Valaitis R, Meagher-Stewart D, Martin-Misener R, Wong ST, MacDonald M, O’Mara L. Organizational factors influencing successful primary care and public health collaboration. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3194-7 PMid:29880042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3194-7

Martin J, Cormican K, Sampaio SC, Wu Q. Shared leadership and team performance: An analysis of moderating factors. Proc Comput Sci. 2018;138:671-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.089

Contractor NS, DeChurch LA, Carson J, Carter DR, Keegan B. The topology of collective leadership. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(6):994-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.010

Meuser JD, Gardner WL, Dinh JE, Hu J, Liden RC, Lord RG. A network analysis of leadership theory: The infancy of integration. J Manage. 2016;42(5):1374-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647099