The Validity of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 for Symptoms of Depression: A Sub- Analysis of the National Health Survey in Indonesia

Sri Idaiani; Rofingatul  Mubasyiroh; Indri Yunita  Suryaputri; Lely  Indrawati; Ika  Dharmayanti

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2022.9999

Authors

Sri Idaiani Research Centre for Pre Clinical and Clinical Medicine, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
Rofingatul Mubasyiroh Research Centre for Pre Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-9103
Indri Yunita Suryaputri Research Centre for Pre Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
Lely Indrawati Research Centre for Pre Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ika Dharmayanti Research Centre for Pre Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9999

Keywords:

Self-reporting questionnaire, Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Validity, Mental-emotional disorder, Symptom, Depression

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate data are required to assess the validity of mental-emotional disorder for symptoms of depression based on Indonesia National Health Survey (NHS).

AIM: This study aims to assess the validity of mental-emotional disorder using self-reporting questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) to the symptoms of depression evaluated through the means of a Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) questionnaire.

METHODS: The data were obtained from a total sample of 555,066 subjects analyzed from the NHS in 2018. These subjects were at least 15 years old with their mental-emotional disorders and symptoms of depression assessed using the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ) and MINI, respectively. This study used the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, likelihood ratio, receiver operating characteristic, kappa Brennan, and Prediger with the STATA version 15.00 to analyze the data.

RESULTS: The cutoff point in each group was different, ranging from 4 to 6 that almost all the area under curve values were above 0.90 and the SRQ agreement with MINI depression is good because they all have values above 0.80.

CONCLUSION: The results obtained are used as material to predict the rate of symptoms depression in Indonesian residents aged ≥15 years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Liu Q, He H, Yang J, Feng X, Zhao F, Lyu J. Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the global burden of disease study. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;126:134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.002 PMid:31439359

Mboi N, Surbakti IM, Trihandini I, Elyazar I, Smith KH, Bahjuri Ali P, et al. On the road to universal health care in Indonesia, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10147):581-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30595-6 PMid:29961639

Kawada T. Duration of depressive symptoms significantly related to increase in mortality. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208(6):593. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.208.6.593 PMid:27251695

Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Janavs J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, et al. The validity of the mini international neuropsychiatric interview according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry. 1997;12(5):232-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83297-X

Sheehan DV, Lecruibier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The mini international neuropsychiatric interview: The development and validation of structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22-33;quiz 34-57. PMid:9881538.

Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH, et al. The mini international neuropsychiatric interview. A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry. 1997;12(5):224-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8

National Institute Of Human Resources Developement. Laporan Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2018. Chennai: National Institute Of Human Resources Development; 2018. Available from: https://labdata.litbang.kemkes.go.id/images/download/ laporan/RKD/2018/laporan_nasional_RKD2018_final.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Dec 10].

Pradeep BS, Gururaj G, Varghese M, Benegal V, Rao GN, Sukumar GM, et al. National mental health survey of India, 2016-rationale, design and methods. PloS One. 2018;13(10):e0205096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205096 PMid:30359382

Harpham T, Reichenheim M, Oser R, Thomas E, Hamid N, Jaswal S, et al. Measuring mental health in a cost-effective manner. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(3):344-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czg041

Dany F, Dewi RM, Tjandrarini DH, Pradono J, Delima D, Sariadji K, et al. Urban-rural distinction of potential determinants for prediabetes in Indonesian population aged ≥15 years: A cross-sectional analysis of Indonesian basic health research 2018 among normoglycemic and prediabetic individuals. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09592-7 PMid:33023540

Idaiani S, Indrawati L. Functional status in relation to depression among elderly individuals in Indonesia: A cross-sectional analysis of the Indonesian National health survey 2018 among elderly individuals. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):2332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12260-z PMid:34969381

Beusenberg M, Orley J. A User’s Guide to the Self Reporting Questionnaire SRQ/Compiled. Available from: https://apps.who. int/iris/handle/10665/61113 [Last accessed on 2022 Feb 01].

Hartono IG. Psychiatric morbidity among patients attending Bangetayu Community Health Centre in Indonesia. Bull Penelit Kesehat. 1996;24(4):42-51.

Gwet KL. Hand Book of Inter Rater Reliability. The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extend of Agreement Among Raters. 4th ed. Gaithersburgh: Advanced Analytic LLC; 2014.

Giang BK, Allebeck P, Kullgren G, Van Tuan N. The vietnamese version of the self reporting questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in detecting mental disorders in rural Vietnam: A validation study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006;52(2):175-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006061251 PMid:16615249

Ventevogel P, De Vries G, Scholte WF, Shinwari NR, Faiz H, Nassery R, et al. Properties of the hopkins symptom checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20) as screening instruments used in primary care in Afghanistan. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(4):328-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0161-8 PMid:17370049

Patel V, Araya R, Chowdhary N, King M, Kirkwood B, Nayak S, et al. Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: A comparison of five screening questionnaires. Psychol Med. 2008;38(2):221-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707002334 PMid:18047768

Chen S, Zhao G, Li L, Wang Y, Chiu H, Caine E. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the self-reporting questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in community settings. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009;55(6):538-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764008095116 PMid:19592444

Van der Westhuizen C, Wyatt G, Williams JK, Stein DJ, Sorsdahl K. Validation of the self reporting questionnaire 20-item (SRQ-20) for use in a low- and middle-income country emergency centre setting. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2016;14(1):37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9566-x PMid:26957953

De Vroege L, Hoedeman R, Nuyen J, Sijtsma K, Van Der Feltz- Cornelis CM. Validation of the PHQ-15 for somatoform disorder in the occupational health care setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):51-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6 PMid:21785907

Endsley P, Weobong B, Nadkarni A. The psychometric properties of GHQ for detecting common mental disorder among community dwelling men in Goa, India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;28:106-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.03.023 PMid:28784361

Urtasun M, Daray FM, Teti GL, Coppolillo F, Herlax G, Saba G, et al. Validation and calibration of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Argentina. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2262-9 PMid:31533674

Netsereab TB, Kifle MM, Tesfagiorgis RB, Habteab SG, Weldeabzgi YK, Tesfamariam OZ. Validation of the WHO self-reporting questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) item in primary health care settings in Eritrea. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0242-y PMid:30386420

Rasmussen A, Ventevogel P, Sancilio A, Eggerman M, Panter-Brick C. Comparing the validity of the self reporting questionnaire and the Afghan symptom checklist: Dysphoria, aggression, and gender in transcultural assessment of mental health. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-206 PMid:25034331

Iraq Mental Health Survey 2006/7; 2009. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/116610/ EMRPUB_2009_EN_1367.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Last accessed on 2022 Feb 09].

Bojorquez I, Aguilera RM, Ramírez J, Cerecero D, Mejía S. Common mental disorders at the time of deportation: A survey Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022 Oct 28; 10(E):1676-1682. 1681 at the mexico-united states border. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(6):1732-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0083-y

Gururaj G, Varghese M, Benegal V, Rao GN, Pathak K, Singh LK, et al. National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015-16. Bengaluru: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences; 2016.

Michel C, Kutschal C, Schimmelmann BG, Schultze-Lutter F. Convergent and concurrent validity of the frankfurt complaint questionnaire as a screener for psychosis risk. J Risk Res. 2016;20(11):1480-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1179209

Farnbach S, Gee G, Eades AM, Evans JR, Fernando J, Hammond B, et al. Process evaluation of the getting it right study and acceptability and feasibility of screening for depression with the aPHQ-9. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7569-4

Leung L. Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):324-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306 PMid:26288766