Implant Supported Fixed Restorations versus Implant Supported Removable Overdentures: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.109Keywords:
fixed restoration, removable over denture, all on four, systematic review, implant supported restorationsAbstract
AIM: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare implant retained fixed restoration versus implant retained over denture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Search was made in 2 databases including PubMed and PubMed Central. Title and abstract were screened to select studies comparing implant retained fixed restorations versus implant retained removable overdentures. Articles which did not follow the inclusion criteria were excluded. Included papers were then read carefully for a second stage filter, this was followed by manual searching of bibliography of selected articles.
RESULTS: The search resulted in 5 included papers. One study evaluated the masticatory function, while the other 4 evaluated the patient satisfaction. Two of them used Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as a measurement tool, while the other two used VAS and Categorical Scales (CAT). Stability, ability to chew, ability to clean, ability to speak and esthetics were the main outcomes of the 4 included papers.
CONCLUSION: Conflicting results was observed between the fixed and removable restorations.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Astrand P, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, Nilson H. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10:207-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00081.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00081.x
Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11(1):108-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x PMid:11168261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
Misch CE. Rationale for Dental implants. In: Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd edition. Mosby, Elsevier, 2008: 3-25.
Bragger U, Karoussis I, Persson R et al. Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:326-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x PMid:15877753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x
Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth – implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:643-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x PMid:15533125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x
Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R et al.A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:119-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x PMid:18067597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long-term implant survival and success: a 10–16-year follow-up of nonsubmerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:772-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x PMid:20636731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x
Quirynen M, Alsaadi G, Pauwels M et al. Microbiological and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction for two treatment options in the edentulous lower jaw after 10 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:277-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01127.x PMid:15877747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01127.x
The Academy of Prosthodontics: The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94: 10-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 17(3):391-8.
Wang F, Monje A, Huang W et al. Maxillary Four Implant-retained Overdentures via Locator Attachment:Intermediate-term Results from a Retrospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18(3):571-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12335 PMid:25810348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12335
Kim HY, Lee JY, Shin SW, Bryant SR. Attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4(4):197-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.197 PMid:23236571 PMCid:PMC3517957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.197
Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2004; 15:351-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01017.x PMid:15142099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01017.x
Shadid, R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2012; 38(3):298-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00146 PMid:21091343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00146
Lundqvist S, Lohmander-Agerskov A, Haraldson T. Speech before and after treatment with bridges on osteointegrated implants in the edentulous upper jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3:57–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030202.x PMid:15900669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030202.x
Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78(1):28-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2
Feine JS, Maskawi K, De Grandmont P et al. Within-subject Comparisons of Implant supported Mandibular Prostheses: Evaluation of Masticatory Function. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(10):1646-56. PMid:7929979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730101001
De Grandmont P, Feine JS, Taché R et al. Within-subject Comparisons of Implant-supported Mandibular Prostheses: Psychometric Evaluation. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(5): 1096-104. PMid:8006237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730051201
Feine JS, de Grandmont P, Boudrias P et al. Within-subject Comparisons of Implant-supported Mandibular Prostheses: Choice of Prosthesis. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(5): 1105-11. PMid:8006238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730051301
Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, et al. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003; 14:125-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x
Heydecke G, McFarland DH, Feine JS, Lund JP. Speech with Maxillary Implant Prostheses: Ratings of Articulation. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(3):236-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300310 PMid:14981126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300310
Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Nys M, Naert I. Maxillary bone resorption in patients with mandibular implant-supported overdentures or fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70(2):135-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90008-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90008-C
Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002; 13:260-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130305.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130305.x
Katsoulis J, Brunner A, Mericske-Stern R. Maintenance of implant-supported maxillary prostheses: a 2-year controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(3):648-56. PMid:21691613
Feine J, Harrison J, Hutchins M. A clinical trial of implant prostheses: performance and preference. J Gt Houst Dent Soc. 1997; 69(5):31-2. PMid:9571871
Dierens M, Collaert B, Deschepper E et al. Patient-centered outcome of immediately loaded implants in the rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009; 20:1070-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01741.x PMid:19719733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01741.x
Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J. 1998; 184(2):90-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809551 PMid:9489217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809551
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17(4):601-2. PMid:12182304
Krennmair G, Weinländer M, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-yearprospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19(2):164-70. PMid:16602365
Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann M, Weber HP. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:560-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x PMid:15355398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x
Van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14(6):720-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x PMid:15015948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x
Guckes AD, Scurria MS, Shugars DA. A conceptional framework for understanding outcomes of oral implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75:633-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90249-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90249-8
Locker D. Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11:453-61. PMid:9922737
Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent. 2006; 15(2):113-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000217907.18396.18 PMid:16766892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000217907.18396.18
Carr AB. Successful long-term treatment outcomes in the field of osseointegrated implants: prosthodontic determinants. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11(5):502-12. PMid:9922741
Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health nimpact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25: 284-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x PMid:9332805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D, Locker D. A comparison of the validity of generic- and disease-specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999; 27:344-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02031.x PMid:10503795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02031.x
Balaguer J, GarcÃa B, Pe-arrocha MA, Pearrocha M. Satisfaction of patient fitted with implant-retained overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16(2):e204-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e204 PMid:20711152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e204
Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, Clokie CM, Feine JS. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant- supported prostheses: psychometric evaluation and patient preference. J Dent Res. 1997; 76(10):1675-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760100901 PMid:9326900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760100901
Oh SH, Kim Y, Park JY et al. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27(2):e31-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12514 PMid:25346286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12514
Jacobs R, Manders E, Van Looy C et al. Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(2):167-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x PMid:11251667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x
Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part I: patients' assessments. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(4):424-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70037-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70037-0
Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA et al. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:125-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x PMid:12562375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140117.x
McFarland DH, Baum SR, Chabot C. Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 100:1093-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.416286 PMid:8759962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.416286
Kaptein ML, Hoogstraten J, de Putter C, de Lange GL, Blijdorp PA. Dental implants in the atrophic maxilla: Measurements of patients' satisfaction and treatment experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998; 9(5):321-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090505.x PMid:9835811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090505.x
Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D et al. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(8):630-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300809 PMid:15271972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300809
Brennan M, Houston F,O'Sullivan M, O'Connell B. Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health–Related Quality of Life Outcomes of Implant Overdentures and Fixed Complete Dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25:791-800. PMid:20657876
Van Waas MA. The influence of clinical variables on patients' satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63(3):307-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90202-N DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90202-N
Meijer HJ, Batenburg RHK, Raghoebar GM. Influence of patient age on the success rate of dental implants supporting an overdenture in an edentulous mandible: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16(4):522-6. PMid:11515999
Castillo-Oyagüe R, Suárez-GarcÃa MJ, Perea C et al. Validation of a new, specific, complete, and short OHRQoL scale (QoLFAST-10) for wearers of implant overdentures and fixed-detachable hybrid prostheses. J Dent. 2016; 49:22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.011 PMid:27134045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
