Comparative Assessment of Women's Reproductive Health in the Areas Bordering With the Aral Sea Region

Yasminur G. Turdybekova; Irina L. Kopobayeva; Berikbay Zh Kultanov

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2017.052

Authors

Yasminur G. Turdybekova Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics of Karaganda State Medical University, Karaganda
Irina L. Kopobayeva Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics of Karaganda State Medical University, Karaganda
Berikbay Zh Kultanov Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Molecular Biology and Medical Genetics of Karaganda State Medical University, Karaganda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.052

Keywords:

women's reproductive health, environmental factors, Aktobe region, South Kazakhstan region, Aral Sea region of Kazakhstan

Abstract

AIM: We examined 435 women of Aktobe region and 328 women of South Kazakhstan region, living in areas bordering the Aral Sea region during the study and comparative assessment of the impact of climatic and anthropogenic factors of Aral region on the reproductive health of the female population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey based on the comprehensive clinical-functional and laboratory studies accounting the regional and environmental ecological factors. Survey subject was the area of 2 settlements of Aktobe region and 1 settlement of South Kazakhstan region.

RESULTS: In all three areas it was revealed that the examined women had the later menarche. There is a trend towards younger age for menopause. The women of South Kazakhstan region often suffer from the pelvic inflammatory disease.

CONCLUSION: Perinatal losses, the case of spontaneous interruption and stagnant pregnancy in history, which can be repeated, one in three women has in the zone of ecological disaster.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Kozhura VV. The main trends of demographic processes in the context of regional. Kozhura VV, Yegerev VV, Mkhoyan AM, et al. Human Ecology. 2006;3: 26-28.

Zhumatova MG, Lokshin VN. Problems of women's reproductive health in Kazakhstan. Problems of reproduction. 2010;3:24-27.

Tereshkevich DP, Igisinov NS, Shcherbakov AZh. Evaluation of mortality among women of childbearing age in the zone of ecological disaster â€“ Kyzylorda region. Young scientists. 2011; 5(2):198-200.

Giuliano AR, Papenfuss M, Nour M, Canfield LM, Schneider A, Hatch K. Antioxidant nutrients: associations with persistent human papillomavirus infection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(11):917-23. PMid:9367065

Rocl CL, Michael CW, Reynolds RK, Ruffin MT: Prevention of cervix cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Gematol. 2000; 33: 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(99)00073-6

Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility in marriage: Guidelines (ed. Saveliyev GM, Kurtser MA, Ovsyannikova TV et al.), 2008.

Tagiyeva GV. The role of autoimmune processes in the genesis of premature shutdown of ovarian function: the Author's abstract of dissertation of candidate of medical sciences, 2005.

World Health Organization. Priority Medicines for Mothers and Children, 2011. WHO/EMP/MAR/2011.1, Geneva, 2011.

World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva: WHO, 2012.

World Health Organization. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control A guide to essential practice. â€“ WHO, 2006.