The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Authors

  • Alan Goce Andonovski University Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skopje
  • Sonja Topuzovska Institute of Medical and Experimental Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University “Ss Cyril and Methodius” , Skopje
  • Milan Samardziski University Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skopje
  • Zoran Bozinovski University Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skopje
  • Biljana Andonovska University Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skopje
  • Zlatko Temelkovski University Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skopje

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.096

Keywords:

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture, Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction, Single bundle ACL reconstruction, Clinical results

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.

AIM: To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.

RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05).  Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION: Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:246—51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508325665 PMid:19109531

Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21:948—57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.110 PMid:16084292

Durafour H, Panisset JC. Anatomic analysis of ACL tears and laxity. Presented at the Congrès annuel de la Société Française d'Arthroscopie, December 2007.

Kazusa H, Nakamae A, Ochi M. Augmentation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Clin Sports Med. 2013; 32:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2012.08.012 PMid:23177467

Nakamae A, Ochi M, Deie M, et al. Biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament remnants: how long do they contribute to knee stability after injury in patients with complete tears? Arthroscopy. 2010;26:1577–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.04.076 PMid:20888171

Arnoczky SP, Tarvin GB, Marshall JL. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement using patellar tendon. An evaluation of graft revascularization in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(2):217-24. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198264020-00011 PMid:7056776

Fremerey W.R, Lobenhoffer P, Zeichen J, Skutek M, Bosch U, Tscherne H. Proprioception after rehabilitation and reconstruction in knees with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2000;82-B:801-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.10306

Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Sumen Y. Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:128—33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020050028 PMid:10738868

Ochi M, Adachi N, Uchio Y, Deie M, Kumahashi N, Ishikawa Y. A minimum 2- year follow-up after selective anteromedial or posterolateral bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:117—22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.011 PMid:19171269

Buda R, Ferruzzi A, Vannini F, Zambelli L, Di Caprio F. Augmentation technique with semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in chronic partial lesions of the ACL: clinical and arthrometric analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1101—7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0117-7 PMid:16799826

Ahn JH, Wang JH, Lee YS et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using remnant preservation and a femoral tensioning technique: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.002 PMid:21704468

Muellner T, Bugge W, Johansen S, Holtan C, Engebretsen L. Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester's experience and the examination technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:302-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670100225 PMid:11685363

Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H. The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:36-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050008 PMid:10663318

Corrigan J, Cashman W, Brady M. Proprioception in the cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74-B:247-50.

C. Löcherbacha, R. Zaynib, P. Chambatb, B. Sonnery-Cottet. Biologically enhanced ACL reconstruction. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2010; 96, 810—815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.007 PMid:20934932

Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M. Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:246—51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508325665 PMid:19109531

Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K. Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:948—57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.110 PMid:16084292

Crain EH, Fithian DC, Paxton EW, et al. Variation in anterior cruciate ligament scar pattern: does the scar pattern affect anterior laxity in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees? Arthroscopy. 2005;21:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.015 PMid:15650662

Wu B, Zhao Z, Li S, Sun L. Preservation of remnant attachment improves graft healing in a rabbit model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(8):1362-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.010 PMid:23906275

Li Z, Liu Y, Shi B, Wu X, Zhu J, Wang Z, Li Z. [An experimental study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnants and remaining bundle preservation]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(3):282-6. PMid:19366134

Mifune Y, Ota S, Takayama K, Hoshino Y, Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Fu FH, Huard J. Therapeutic advantage in selective ligament augmentation for partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: results in an animal model. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):365-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512471614 PMid:23299851

Gohil S, Annear P.O, Breidahl W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B:1165-71. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.19339 PMid:17905952

Ahn JH, Lee SH, Choi SH, Lim TK. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts: comparison of remnant bundle preservation and standard technique.Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(9):1768-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510368132 PMid:20805412

Denti M, Monteleone M, Berardi A, Panni AS. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Mechanoreceptors: Histologic Studies on Lesions and Reconstruction. Clin Orthop. 1994;308:29-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199411000-00005

Ochi M, Iwasa J, Uchio Y et al. The regeneration of sensory neurons in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;1:902-906. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9202

Georgoulis AD, Pappa L, Moebius U et al. The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remnants of ruptured ACL as possible source of re-innervation of ACL autograft. J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9: 364-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670100240 PMid:11734875

Lee BI, Min KD, Choi HS, Kwon SW, Chun DI, Yun ES, Lee DW, Jin SY, Yoo JH. Immunohistochemical study of mechanoreceptors in the tibial remnant of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament in human knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(9):1095-1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0831-z PMid:19533097

Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al. Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:330–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164702320155356 PMid:12143983

Ahn JH, Lee YS, Ha HC. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring autograft: technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:1011-1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0597-7 PMid:18299859

Published

2017-07-20

How to Cite

1.
Andonovski AG, Topuzovska S, Samardziski M, Bozinovski Z, Andonovska B, Temelkovski Z. The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2017 Jul. 20 [cited 2024 Apr. 29];5(5):624-9. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2017.096

Issue

Section

B - Clinical Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)