The Effect of Gaseous Ozone in Infected Root Canal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.102Keywords:
Antibacterial Effect, CHX, Gaseous Ozone, NaCl, NaOCl, Root CanalAbstract
OBJECTIVES: During the treatment of chronic apical periodontitis and pulp necrosis the main role is to irrigate the root canal.
AIM: The aim of this in vivo study was to irrigate with 0.9% NaCl (Natrium Chloride), 2.5 % NaOCl (Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Sigma Aldrich - Germany) and 2% CHX (Chlorhexidine Digluconate Solution, Sigma Aldrich - Spain) combined with Gaseous Ozone (Prozone WH, Austria).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was realised in the University Dentistry Clinical Centre of Kosovo (UDCCK), respectively in the Department of Endodontic and Dental Pathology, Dental Branch, Faculty of Medicine, Prishtina, Kosovo. The 40 subjects involved in this study belonged to both genders, in age between 15 -65 years. The sample selection was randomised. The retroalveolar radiography for each patient was taken in the suspected tooth. As a therapeutic plan the authors decided to disinfect the root canal with the irrigants, as follows: 2.5 % NaOCl, 2 % CHX and gaseous ozone.
RESULTS: The statistical analyses were based on Kruskal - Vallis test, X - test, DF = 3, r < 0.01. In the isolated average number of the aerobe and anaerobe bacteria colonies, when gaseous ozone was used, there was the significant statistical difference.
CONCLUSIONS: When gaseous ozone was combined with irrigants 0.9%, 2.5 % NaOCl and 2% CHX, it was concluded that the number of colonies of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria was reduced.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Cheang GSP, Ho MWM. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2001; 16:332-335. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302X.2001.160603.x
Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Texeira FB. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigation in Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(5):702-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007 PMid:17368057
Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high resolution computed tomography. Journal of Endodontic. 2001; 27(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00001 PMid:11487156
HÏ‹lsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation: literature review and case reports (review). Int Endod J. 2003; 33:186-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00303.x
Hϋlsmann M, RödigyT, Nordmeyer S. Complications during Root Canal Irrigation. Endod Topiccs. 2007; 16:27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00237.x
Spänberg L, Pascon EA. The importance of material preparation for the expression of citotoxicity during in vitro evaluation of biomaterials. J Endod. 1988; 14:247-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80178-X
Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1992; 18:605-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81331-2
Kaufman AY, Keila S. Hypersensitivity to sodium hypochlorite. J End. 1989; 15:224-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80241-9
Rüsell AD, Day MJ. Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. J Hosp Infected. 1993; 25:229-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(93)90109-D
Brugnera A, Zanin F, Barbin EL, Spanó JC, Santana R, Pécora JD. Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on radicular dentine permeability using different irrigating solutions. Lasers Surg Med. 2003; 33(4):256-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10214 PMid:14571450
Ercan E, Öztekinci T, Atakul, Gül K. Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod. 2004; 30(2):84-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00005 PMid:14977302
Leonardo MR, Tanoмaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution, J Endod. 1999; 25(3):167-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80135-6
IJS German, Ozone Therapy in Dentistry. A Systematic Review. 2013.
Eidler V, Linetskiy I, Hubálková H, Staňková H, Šмucler R, Mazánek J. Ozone and Its Usage in General Medicine and Dentistry. A Review Article. Prague Medical Report. 2008; 109(1):5-13.
Mollica P, Harris P. Integrating oxygen/ozone therapy in to your practice, 2010.
Paraskeva P, Graham NJD. Ozonation of municipal wastewater effluens. Water Environment Research. 2002; 74:569-81. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143002X140387 PMid:12540098
Hems RS, Gulabivala K, Ng-YL, Ready D, Spratt DA. An in vitro evaluation of the ability of ozone to kill a strain of Enteroccocus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38:22-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00891.x PMid:15606819
Alwadi J, Lamey PJ, Cunningham JL, Domingo H, Lynch E, Grootveld MC. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Ozone in Root Canal Treatment. International Association for Dental Research. 2008; 10-12.
Müller P, Goggenheim B, Schmidlin PR. Efficacy of gasiform ozone and photodynamic therapy on a multispecies oral biofilm in vitro: Eur J. Oral Sci. 2007; 115:77-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00418.x PMid:17305720
Virtej AA, Colin RA, Wolggang H, Raab MA, Pfeffer K. Determination of the Performance of Various Root Canal Disinfection Methods after In Situ Carriage. Journal of Endodontics. 2007; 33(8):926-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.025 PMid:17878076
Jankovic B, Klaric E, Prskalo K, Marovic D, Pandurovic V, Tarle Z. Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Intracanal Ozone Treatment. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2013; 47(2):127-136. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc47/2/4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
