Evaluation of the Efficacy of Combined Therapy of Methotrexate and Etanercept versus Methotrexate as a Mono-Therapy

Authors

  • Sylejman Rexhepi Clinic for Rheumatology, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo
  • Mjellma Rexhepi Clinic for Rheumatology, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo
  • Blerta Rexhepi Clinic for Rheumatology, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo
  • Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka Department of Physical Medicine, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo
  • Vigan Mahmutaj Clinic for Cardiology, University of Clinical Centre of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.173

Keywords:

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Methotrexate, Etanercept

Abstract

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Methotrexate (MTX) alone and combined therapy with Etanercept (ETN) and Methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS: In the randomised control study, conducted in the period from March 2014 until March 2016, we evaluated the efficacy of the treatment of patients with RA with MTX as monotherapy and combination treatment with MTX and ETN. In the Clinic of Rheumatology in Prishtina, 90 adult patients with RA were treated in combination with ETN (doses of 50 mg subcutaneously/weekly), with oral MTX (doses up to 20 mg weekly), and MTX alone (doses up to 20 mg weekly) during this period of two years. Clinical response was assessed using European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria and the Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Radiographic changes were measured in the beginning and at the end of the study using Larsen’s method.

RESULTS: Of the cohort groups of 90 patients, mean age of 55.63, 15 patients, (16.6 %) were treated with combined therapy (ETN plus MTX) and 75 patients (83.3%) with monotherapy (MTX). After two years of treatment the group with combined therapy resulted with improvement of acute phase reactants as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for the first hour (41.1 vs. 10.3 mm/hour) and C - reactive protein (CRP) (40.8 vs. 6 mg/liter), and compared to the group treated with monotherapy, there were no significant changes (ESR: 45.7 vs 34.3 mm/hour; CRP: 48 vs 24 mg/liter). Before the treatment, the severity of the disease was high, wherein the group with combined therapy DAS28 was 5.32, compared to the monotherapy group whom DAS28 was 5.90. After 2 years of treatment, we had significant changes in the results of DAS28, wherein the group treated with ETN plus MTX DAS28 was 2.12 ± 0.15, while in the group of patients treated with MTX DAS28 were 3.75 ± 0.39 (t = 13.03; df = 58; p < 0.0001). The group with combined therapy showed no evidence of radiographic progression comparing to the group of patients with monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results achieved during 2 years we can conclude that ETN in combination with MTX reduced disease activity, slowed radiographic progression and improved clinical manifestations more effectively than MTX alone. No serious adverse events were noticed in the group with combination treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(23):2205-2219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1004965 PMid:22150039

Pincus T, Sokka T, Wolfe F. Premature mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evolving concepts. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44: 1234–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1234::AID-ART213>3.0.CO;2-R

Boers M, Tugwell P, Felson DT, et al., World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21:86–89.

Emery P, Salmon M. Early rheumatoid arthritis: time to aim for remission? Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54:944–947. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.54.12.944 PMid:8546524 PMCid:PMC1010056

Rasheed Z, Haqqi TM. Update on targets of biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2008; 4(4):246. https://doi.org/10.2174/157339708786263915 PMid:20165551 PMCid:PMC2822346

Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(9):2569-2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584 PMid:20872595

Pincus T. The DAS is the most specific measure, but a patient questionnaire is the most informative measure to assess rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006; 33:834–837. PMid:16652413

Sokka T, Pincus T. Quantitative joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005; 23:S58–S62. PMid:16273786

Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995; 38:44–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380107 PMid:7818570

Solymossy C, Dixey J, Utley M, Gallivan S, Young A, Cox N, et al. Larsen scoring of digitized X-ray images. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999; 38: 1127–1129. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/38.11.1127

Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977; 18(4):481–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418517701800415

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Sieper J, Emery P, Keystone EC, Schiff MH, Mease P, Van Riel PL. Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2007; 66(suppl 3):iii2-2. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.081430 PMid:17934088 PMCid:PMC2095281

Weinblatt ME, Kreer JM, Bankhurst AS. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. /N Engl J Med. 1999; 340 (4): 253-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199901283400401 PMid:9920948

Bathon JM, Martin RW, et al. A comparison treatment of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1586-93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200011303432201 PMid:11096165

Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, et al. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363:675–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15640-7

Yelin E, Katz P, Lubeck D, et al. Impact of etanercept (Enbrel®) on health care use and employment in early RA [abstract] Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44(Suppl):S152, 59520.

Published

2018-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Rexhepi S, Rexhepi M, Rexhepi B, Sahatçiu-Meka V, Mahmutaj V. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Combined Therapy of Methotrexate and Etanercept versus Methotrexate as a Mono-Therapy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 24 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];6(5):786-9. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.173

Issue

Section

B - Clinical Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)