The Influence of Small, Midi, Medium and Large Fields of View on Accuracy of Linear Measurements in CBCT Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Authors

  • Hanaa Elshenawy Department of Surgery and Oral Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
  • Wessam Aly Department of Surgery and Oral Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
  • Nashwa Salah Oral Radiology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Sherine Nasry Department of Surgery and Oral Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
  • Enas Anter Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Khalid Ekram Oral Radiology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.232

Keywords:

Fields of view, Linear Measurements, CBCT, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to assess the effect of changing the field of view on the dimensional accuracy of CBCT imaging.

METHODS: The implant-bone models were randomly numbered from 1 to 13 by the principal researcher, and then on each model at the incisors region three positions were selected and marked on the model with a permanent blue marker. Then at each marked position three radio-opaque ‘RO’ markers “gutta-percha pieces†were glued on the model surfaces as following; two pieces on the facial surface one occlusally (at the alveolar crest) and one apically (at the inferior border of the model) both were on the same vertical line and perpendicular to the horizontal plane, while the third one was placed on the lingual surface opposing the occlusally placed buccal piece. CBCT examinations of each bone model were performed using Cranex3Dx CBCT (Helsinki, Finland) machine. Each model was scanned four times with standardised tube current and voltage of 12.5 mA and 90 kVp respectively at four different FOVs. The FOVs used were as following: Small FOV: 50 x 50 mm with voxel size 200 µm, Midi FOV: 61 x 78 mm with voxel size 300 µm, Medium FOV: 78 x 78 mm with voxel size 300 µm, Large FOV: 78 x 150 mm with voxel size 350 µm. The reference standard in this study was the real linear measurements that were obtained directly on the implant-bone models using high precision sliding electronic digital calliper with 0-150 mm internal and external measuring range and 0.01 mm resolution accuracy. The index test in the current study was the CBCT linear measurements obtained from CBCT images of implant-bone models using small, midi, medium and large FOVs.

RESULTS: The results of this study showed that both medium and large FOVs showed a statistically significant difference, which could be translated into clinical relevance only in thickness measurements.

CONCLUSION: The interpretation of these results leads to the assumption that increasing the FOV size together with voxel size could adversely affect the accuracy of CBCT linear measurements, especially when small distances are to be assessed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Gupta S, Patil N, Solanki J, Singh R, Laller S. Oral Implant Imaging: A Review. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS. 2015; 22:7-17. PMid:26715891 PMCid:PMC4681716

Chuenchompoonut V, Ida M, Honda E, Kurabayashi T, Sasaki T. Accuracy of panoramic radiography in assessing the dimensions of radiolucent jaw lesions with distinct or indistinct borders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003; 32:80-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/29360754 PMid:12775660

Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic Imaging for Dental Implant Therapy. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2014; 4:4. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.143440 PMid:25379354 PMCid:PMC4220422

Tarazona-Ãlvarez P, Romero-Millán J, Pe-arrocha-Oltra D, Fuster-Torres MÃ, Tarazona B, Pe-arrocha-Diago M. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2014; 6:e271. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51426 PMid:25136429 PMCid:PMC4134857

Kamburoğlu K, Kiliç C, Özen T, Horasan S. Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2010; 39:95-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/85088069 PMid:20100921 PMCid:PMC3520198

Kamburoğlu K, Murat SE, Kılıç C, Yüksel S, Avsever H, Farman A, Scarfe WC. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2014; 43:20130332. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130332 PMid:24645965 PMCid:PMC4082260

Ganguly R, Ramesh A, Pagni S. The accuracy of linear measurements of maxillary and mandibular edentulous sites in cone-beam computed tomography images with different fields of view and voxel sizes under simulated clinical conditions. Imaging science in dentistry. 2016; 46:93-101. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.93 PMid:27358816 PMCid:PMC4925656

Anter E, Zayet MK, El-Dessouky SH. Effect of Field of View On the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss in Periodontal Defects. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2016; 62:814.

Published

2019-03-29

How to Cite

1.
Elshenawy H, Aly W, Salah N, Nasry S, Anter E, Ekram K. The Influence of Small, Midi, Medium and Large Fields of View on Accuracy of Linear Measurements in CBCT Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2019 Mar. 29 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];7(6):1037-41. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2019.232

Issue

Section

D - Dental Sciences