Comparison of Honey versus Polylactide Anti-Adhesion Barrier on Peritoneal Adhesion and Healing of Colon Anastomosis in Rabbits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.284Keywords:
Peritoneal Adhesion, Honey, Polylactide, ColonAbstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative adhesion is still a consequence of intra-abdominal surgeries, which results in bowel obstruction and abdominopelvic pain. Bowel anastomosis as a common abdominal surgery has the incidence of leakage in up to 30% of patients that increase morbidity and mortality. Due to similar pathways of adhesion formation and wound healing, it is important to find a way to reduce adhesions and anastomosis leakage.
AIM: This study was designed to compare antiadhesive as well as anastomosis healing improvement effect of honey and polylactide anti-adhesive barrier film.
METHODS: Forty-five rabbits divided into three groups of honey, adhesion barrier film, and control group in an animal study. Under a similar condition, rabbits underwent resection and anastomosis of cecum under general anaesthesia. In the first group, honey was used at the anastomosis site, in the second one polylactide adhesion barrier film utilised, and the third one was the control group. Adhesion, as well as anastomosis leakage, was assessed after 21 days. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) for Windows version 25.
RESULTS: Three groups of 15 rabbits were studied. The results showed that mean peritoneal adhesion score (PAS) was lower in the honey group (1.67) in comparison to the adhesion barrier film group (3.40) and the control group (6.33).
CONCLUSION: Bio-absorbable polylactide barrier has an anti-adhesion effect but is not suitable for intestinal anastomosis in rabbits. Further studies needed to evaluate these effects on human beings.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Roman H, Canis M, Kamble M, et al. Efficacy of three adhesion-preventing agents in reducing severe peritoneal trauma induced by bipolar coagulation in a laparoscopic rat model. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(1):1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.039 PMid:15831283
Ellis H. Medicolegal consequences of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. J R Soc Med. 2001; 94(7):331-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680109400703 PMid:11418701 PMCid:PMC1281595
van der Wal JB, Jeekel J. Biology of the peritoneum in normal homeostasis and after surgical trauma. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(Suppl 2):9-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01345.x PMid:17824965
Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990; 72(1):60-3.
Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2006; 132(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.12.002 PMid:16457846
Ergul E, Korukluoglu B.Peritoneal adhesions: facing the enemy. Int J Surg. 2008; 6(3):253-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.05.010 PMid:17617231
Kössi J, Salminen P, Rantala A, et al. Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg. 2003; 90(11):1441-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4272 PMid:14598429
Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001; 88(9):1157-68. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x PMid:11531861
Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, et al. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(2):254-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85 PMid:17245179 PMCid:PMC1876987
Aznan MI, Khan OH, Unar AO, Sharif SE, Khan AH, Aziz SH, Zakaria AD. Effect of Tualang honey on the anastomotic wound healing in large bowel anastomosis in a rats-A randomized controlled trial. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2015; 16(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1003-6 PMid:26803744 PMCid:PMC4724403
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, et al. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J. 1980; 281(6237):411-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.281.6237.411 PMid:7427298 PMCid:PMC1713296
Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185(2):105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00018-5
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(9):1150-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5054 PMid:16035134
Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2006; 132(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.12.002 PMid:16457846
Gulcelik MA, Dinc S, Bir F, et al. Locally applied molgramostim improves wound healing at colonic anastomoses in rats after ligation of the common bile duct. Can J Surg. 2005; 48(3):213-8.
Ustek S, Kismet K, Akkus MA, et al. Effect of povidone-iodine liposome hydrogel on colonic anastomosis. Eur Surg Res. 2005; 37(4):242-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087870 PMid:16260875
Aziz Z, Abdul Rasool Hassan B. The effects of honey compared to silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burns: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Burns. 2017; 43(1):50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.004 PMid:27576926
Farzadinia P, Jofreh N, Khatamsaz S, et al. Anti-inflammatory and Wound Healing Activities of Aloe vera, Honey and Milk Ointment on Second-Degree Burns in Rats. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2016; 15(3):241-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734616645031 PMid:27217089
Saber A. Effect of honey versus intergel in intraperitoneal adhesion prevention and colonic anastomotic healing: a randomized controlled study in rats. Int J Surg. 2010; 8(2):121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.010 PMid:19961959
Yuzbasioglu MF, Kurutas EB, Bulbuloglu E, et al. Administration of honey to prevent peritoneal adhesions in a rat peritonitis model. Int J Surg. 2009; 7(1):54-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.10.011 PMid:19042166
Trew GH, Pistofidis GA, Brucker SY, et al. A first-in-human, randomized, controlled, subject- and reviewer-blinded multicenter study of Actamaxâ„¢ Adhesion Barrier. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295(2):383-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4211-x PMid:27844212 PMCid:PMC5281664
Berdah SV, Mariette C, Denet C, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety, ease of use, and reliability of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose powder adhesion barrier versus no barrier in colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Trials. 2014; 15:413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-413 PMid:25348087 PMCid:PMC4233044
Kim EH, Kim JW, Han GD, et al. Biocompatible, drug-loaded anti-adhesion barrier using visible-light curable furfuryl gelatin derivative. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018; 120(Pt A):915-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.180 PMid:30071230
Rahimi VB, Shirazinia R, Fereydouni N, Zamani P, Darroudi S, Sahebkar AH, Askari VR. Comparison of honey and dextrose solution on post-operative peritoneal adhesion in rat model. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2017; 92:849-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.114 PMid:28618654
Minden-Birkenmaier B, Bowlin G. Honey-based templates in wound healing and tissue engineering. Bioengineering. 2018; 5(2):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5020046 PMid:29903998 PMCid:PMC6027142
Li X, Zou B, Zhao N, et al. Potent anti-adhesion barrier combined biodegradable hydrogel with multifunctional Turkish galls extract. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018; 10(29):24469-24479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b10668 PMid:29974740
Yang Y, Liu X, Li Y, et al. A postoperative anti-adhesion barrier based on photoinduced imine-crosslinking hydrogel with tissue-adhesive ability. Acta Biomater. 2017; 62:199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.047 PMid:28867650
diZerega GS, Coad J, Donnez J. Clinical evaluation of endometriosis and differential response to surgical therapy with and without application of Oxiplex/AP adhesion barrier gel. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87(3):485-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1505 PMid:17126335
Mettler L, Hucke J, Bojahr B, Tinneberg HR, Leyland N, Avelar R. A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy. Human reproduction. 2008; 23(5):1093-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den080 PMid:18346996
Gollu A, Kismet K, Kilicoglu B, et al. Effect of honey on intestinal morphology, intraabdominal adhesions and anastomotic healing. Phytother Res. 2008; 22(9):1243-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2457 PMid:18697181
Aysan E, Ayar E, Aren A, Cifter C. The role of intra-peritoneal honey administration in preventing post-operative peritoneal adhesions. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2002; 104(2):152-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00070-2
Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(8 Suppl):S538-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000081436.09826.A4 PMid:12907884
Cooper RA, Molan PC, Harding KG. The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds. J Appl Microbiol. 2002; 93(5):857-63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01761.x PMid:12392533
Taormina PJ, Niemira BA, Beuchat LR. Inhibitory activity of honey against foodborne pathogens as influenced by the presence of hydrogen peroxide and level of antioxidant power. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001; 69(3):217-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00505-0
Gheldof N, Wang XH, Engeseth NJ. Identification and quantification of antioxidant components of honeys from various floral sources. J Agric Food Chem. 2002; 50(21):5870-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0256135 PMid:12358452
Rodgers KE, Verco SJ, diZerega GS. Effects of intraperitoneal 4% icodextrin solution on the healing of bowel anastomoses and laparotomy incisions in rabbits. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5(4):324-30. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00447.x PMid:12814410
Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46(10):1310-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6739-2 PMid:14530667
Van Oosterom FJ, van Lanschot JJ, Oosting J, Obertop H. Hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane surrounding an intraperitoneal or subcutaneous jejunojejunostomy in rats. The European journal of surgery. 2000; 166(8):654-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750008349 PMid:11003437
Erturk S, Yuceyar S, Temiz M, et al. Effects of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose antiadhesion barrier on ischemic colonic anastomosis: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46(4):529-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6594-1 PMid:12682549
Lusby PE, Coombes A, Wilkinson JM. Honey: a potent agent for wound healing? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2002; 29(6):295-300. https://doi.org/10.1097/00152192-200211000-00008 PMid:12439453
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Ali Reza Negahi, Parisa Hosseinpour, Mohammad Vaziri, Hamed Vaseghi, Pedram Darvish, Behnaz Bouzari, Seyed Hamzeh Mousavie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0