Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy of Gluma® and D/Sense® Desensitizer in the Treatment of Root Sensitivity Induced by Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy

Authors

  • Saad Mohammed Al-Qahtani Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Asir, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.344

Keywords:

Root sensitivity,, Gluma®, D/sense, Scaling and root planing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dentinal hypersensitivity is one of the most common sequels of non-surgical periodontal therapy. Resulted discomfort may restrain patients from oral hygiene maintenance, thus affects the long-term success of periodontal therapy. So, it becomes a prime concern of the clinician to manage the post-operative hypersensitivity.

AIM: This clinical investigation aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of D/Sense® and Gluma® in preventing post-operative sensitivity after non-surgical periodontal therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present randomised, double-blind, split-mouth study was conducted on forty-five (22 male, 23 female) systemically healthy patients, with the mean age of 40 ± 17.5 years. Visual Analogue scale was used to evaluate root sensitivity after application of tactile and cold stimuli at baseline, 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks after scaling and root planing. After scaling and root planning, the sites were randomly divided into different groups for the application of desensitising agents. Collected data were analysed by using, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for inter-group and paired t-test for intra-group comparisons.

RESULTS: No adverse or side effects were reported by any of the patients throughout the study period. Gluma® showed a statistically significant reduction in the VAS score for root sensitivity as compared to D/Sense®, at 1, 2- and 4-weeks follow-up period (p < 0.05). Whereas, at 6th-week follow-up, both the solution showed almost similar score for root hypersensitivity. Intragroup comparison for D/Sense® revealed a significant difference in scores from baseline to all intervals (p < 0.05), except baseline to 6 weeks (p > 0.05). Whereas Gluma® showed a significant difference in scores from baseline to 2nd-week follow-up (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The result of the present investigation revealed that application of Gluma® resulted in better control on iatrogenic root hypersensitivity as compared to the D/Sense® during the initial follow-up period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Claffey N, Polyzois I, Ziaka P. An overview of non-surgical and surgical therapy. Periodontol 2000 2004; 36:35-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.00073.x PMid:15330942

Jacobson L, Blomlo¨ fJ, Lindskog S. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities. Scand J Dent Res. 1994; 102:156-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01172.x PMid:8085122

Bergenholtz G, Lindhe J. Effect of experimentally induced marginal periodontitis and periodontal scaling on the dental pulp. J clin Periodontol. 1978; 5:59-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1978.tb01907.x PMid:97332

Holland GR, Nahri MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on Dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24:808-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01194.x PMid:9402502

Von Troil B, Needleman I, Sanz M. A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:173-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.10.x PMid:12787217

Jacobsen PL, Bruce G. Clinical dentin hypersensitivity: understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2001; 2:1-8.

Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 10th Ed., 2002;351-354; 483-4.

Gillam DG, Orchardson R. Advances in the treatment of root Dentin sensitivity: mechanisms and treatment principles. Endod Topics. 2006; 13:13-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2006.00209.x

Grossman LI. A systematic method for the treatment of hypersensitive Dentin. J Am Dent Assoc. 1935; 22:592-602. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1935.0110

Schupbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ . Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Sci. 1997; 105:414-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb02138.x

Dina Al-Tayeb. Management of root-Dentin hypersensitivity following non-surgical periodontal therapy: clinical and scanning electron microscopic study. Egyp Dent J. 2008; 54:1-15.

Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain. Anesthesiolog. 2001; 95:1356-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013

Brahmbhatt N, Bhavsar N, Sahayata V, Acharya A, Kshatriya P. Adouble blind controlled trial comparing three treatment modalities for dentin hypersensitivity. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17:e483-90. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17594 PMCid:PMC3476091

Addy M, Mostafa P, Newcombe RG. Dentin hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque. J Dent.1987; 15:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(87)90045-5

Narhimvo. Dentin Sensitivity a review. J Biol Buccale. 1985; 13:75-96.

Matsumoto K, Nakamura G, Morita Y, Oti K. Suzuki K. Scanning electron microscopic study on the hypersensitivity of the exposed root surface. Jap J Conserv Dent. 1982; 25:2-147.

Oyama T, Matsumoto K. A clinical and morphological study of cervical hypersensitivity. J Endodon. 1991; 17:500-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81798-X

Hafez AA, Cox CF, Mills JC. Efficiency of sealing agents against bacterial micro leakage of etched vital dentin. IADR, J Dent Res. 2000; 79:431.

Drisko C. Dentin hypersensitivity: dental hygiene and periodontal considerations. Int Dent J. 2002; 52:385-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00938.x

Kim S. Hypersensitive teeth desensitization of pulpal sensory nerves. J Endodon. 1986; 12:482-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80203-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80203-5

Yilmaz NA, Ertas E, OrucoÄŸlu H. Evaluation of Five Different Desensitizers: A Comparative Dentin Permeability and SEM Investigation in Vitro. Open Dent J. 2017; 11:15-33. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010015 PMid:28484578 PMCid:PMC5396078

Kishore A, Mehrotra KK, Sainbi SC. Effectiveness of desensitizing agents. J Endodon. 2002; 28:34-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200201000-00008 PMid:11806646

Crispin J B. Dentin sensitivity and the clinical evaluation of a unique Dual-action dentin desensitizer. Postgrad Dent. 2001; 8:3-7.

Dayton RE, De Marco TJ, Swedlow D. Treatment of hypersensitive root surfaces with dental adhesive materials. J Periodontol. 1974; 45:873-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1974.45.12.873 PMid:4533496

Pereira JC , Bonato AC, Martineli F, Tung MS. Replica of human dentin treated with different desensitizing agents: A methodology SEM study In-vitro. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13:75-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402002000200001 PMid:12238807

Schupbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ. Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Sci. 1997; 105:414-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb02138.x

Ding YJ, Yao H, Wang GH, Song H. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of Clinpro XT varnish and Gluma dentin desensitizer on dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2014; 27:79-83.

de Assis CDE, Antoniazzi RP, Zanatta FB, Rösing CK. Efficacy of Gluma Desensitizer on dentin hypersensitivity in periodontally treated patients. Braz Oral Res. 2006; 20:252-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242006000300013

Duran I, Sengun A. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical Dentin sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31:351-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01241.x PMid:15089941

Jalalian E, Meraji N, Mirzaei M. A Comparison of the Efficacy of Potassium Nitrate and Gluma Desensitizer® in the Reduction of Hypersensitivity in Teeth with Full-crown Preparations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009; 1:066-073.

Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of Dentin hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27:715-21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027010715.x PMid:11034117

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

1.
Al-Qahtani SM. Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy of Gluma® and D/Sense® Desensitizer in the Treatment of Root Sensitivity Induced by Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2019 May 29 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];7(10):1685-90. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2019.344

Issue

Section

D - Dental Sciences