Restructuring of Gynecology-Obstetric Services Provision Based on Diagnosis-Related Groups Model

Authors

  • Marija Seistrajkova RE-MEDIKA General Hospital, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5693-2817
  • Neda Milevska Kostova Institute for Social Innovation, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
  • Stjepan Oreskovic Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.10616

Keywords:

Diagnosis-related group-related hospital payment, Gynecology and obstetrics services and deliveries, Re-organization of health services

Abstract

The implementation of the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) model in public hospitals in North Macedonia started in 2009. Purposes were data collection, cost management, standardization of services and budget allocation. Of all DRG-coded health services, about 25% are related to gynecology/obstetric and neonatology. Aim of this research was to investigate, analyze and evaluate possible restructuring of gynecology-obstetric services on a national level using the existing DRG model in place, focused on deliveries as a benchmark for service provision. We used the Health Insurance Fund DRG database for health services, populated online by medical professionals. Data was retrieved retrospectively for the period 2015-2019, with focus on 2018 as mid-point year. Statistical methods were used to describe the structure of the gynecology/obstetric and delivery services as per the DRG model. Results showed poor structure of the health network for organized provision of delivery service. Transfers to other health facilities (about 18%) and transfers towards tertiary health care (about 22%) showed low capacity of coping with the demand for provision of services (deliveries). Simulation model presents possible restructuring of services and improved hospitals’ efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Gjorgjev D, Bacanovic A, Cicevalieva S, Sulevski Z, Grosse-Tebbe S. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Health system review. Health Syst Transit 2006;8(2):1-98.

Kostova NM, Chichevalieva S, Ponce NA, van Ginneken E, Winkelmann J. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia health system review. Health Syst Transit 2017;19(3):1-60. PMid28485716

Government of the Republic of North Macedonia. Law on Health Protection in Republic of North Macedonia “Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” nos. 43/2012, 145/2012, 87/2013, 164/2013, 39/2014, 43/2014, 132/2014, 188/2014, 10/2015, 61/2015, 154/2015, 192/2015, 17/2016, 37/2016 and 20/2019 and “Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia” no. 101/2019. North Macedonia: Government of the Republic of North Macedonia; 2019. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.es.2019.12.61.1.19

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Macedonia. Rule Book for Changes and Additions to the Rule book on the Criteria for Determining the Organizational Units of the Public Healthcare Institutions. Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia no. 04/2007. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Macedonia; 2007.

Health Insurance Fund. DRG, Diagnosis Related Groups, Yearly report for year 2017. Macedonian: Health Insurance Fund; 2018. Available from: https://www.fzo.org.mk/WBStorage/Files/Godisen%20Izvestaj%202017.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 05].

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2012;130(3):587-97. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1999 PMid22926177

WHO Regional Office for Europe. National Perinatal Care Master Plan. Stratified Model of Obstetric and Newborn Care Provision. Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020.

Dhlakama K, Bikwa B, Rukweza J, Makoni P, Zvinavashe M. Difficult delivery: A concept analysis. Quest J Res Pharma Sci 2019;5:01-7.

Zeitlin J, Wildman K. Scientific Final Report. Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe. PERISTAT. Contrat n° SI2.254141 (2000CVF3-502).

Zeitlin J, Papiernik E, Bréart G, EUROPET Group. Regionalization of perinatal care in Europe. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9(2):99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2003.08.004 PMid16256713

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ. Births in the United States, 2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2019;346:1-8. PMid31442195

Boulkedid R, Alberti C, Sibony O. Quality indicator development and implementation in maternity units. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(4):609-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.04.001 PMid23642350

Handley SC, Passarella M, Srinivas SK, Lorch SA. Identifying individual hospital levels of maternal care using administrative data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):538. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06516-y PMid34074286

Staebler S. Regionalized systems of perinatal care: Health policy considerations. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011;11(1):37-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0b013e318206fd5a PMid21285655

Kroelinger CD, Okoroh EM, Goodman DA, Lasswell SM, Barfield WD. Designation of neonatal levels of care: A review of state regulatory and monitoring policies. J Perinatol. 2020;40(3):369-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0500-0 PMid31570793

Boulkedid R, Sibony O, Bossu-Salvador C, Oury JF, Alberti C. Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart. BJOG. 2010;117(10):1225-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02632.x PMid20560945

Skelton AG. The relationship among cost, quality, and competition: An analysis of obstetrics services in Missouri hospitals. J Health Care Finance. 1997;24(1):30-44. PMid9327357

Figueras J, McKee M, Lessof S, Duran A, Menabde N. Background Document. Health Systems, Health and Wealth: Assessing the Case for Investing in Health Systems. World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60098-2

Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, Wiley M. Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe Moving towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. United Kingdom: Open University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3197

Quentin W, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Blümel M, Geissler A, Busseall R. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):713-23. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0876 PMid23569051

Richardson DK, Reed K, Cutler JC, Boardman RC, Goodman K, Moynihan T, et al. Perinatal regionalization versus hospital competition: The Hartford example. Pediatrics. 1995;96(3 Pt 1):417-23. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.96.3.417 PMid7651771

Moxon SG, Blencowe H, Bailey P, Bradley J, Day LT, Ram PK, et al. Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0218748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218748 PMid31295262

Catalano A, Bennett A, Busacker A, Carr A, Goodman D, Kroelinger C, et al. Implementing CDC’s level of care assessment tool (LOCATe): A national collaboration to improve maternal and child Health. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017;26(12):1265-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6771 PMid29240547

Downloads

Published

2022-08-28

How to Cite

1.
Seistrajkova M, Milevska Kostova N, Oreskovic S. Restructuring of Gynecology-Obstetric Services Provision Based on Diagnosis-Related Groups Model. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 28 [cited 2024 Apr. 18];10(B):2166-71. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/10616

Issue

Section

Gynecology and Obstetrics

Categories

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.