Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing with Air Abrasion on Post-operative Sensitivity for Indirect Resin Composite Restorations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11475Keywords:
Immediate dentin sealing, Air abrasion, Surface treatment, Visual analog scale, Post-operative sensitivityAbstract
Background: Various treatment modalities are available to decrease the postoperative sensitivity of indirect resin composite restorations.
Aim: Compare the effectiveness of immediate dentin sealing using universal adhesive and air abrasion versus immediate dentin sealing without air abrasion on postoperative sensitivity in teeth prepared for indirect resin composite restorations.
Methods and Materials: Twenty-eight patients between 18 and 30 years of age were recruited and randomized to two treatment protocols with fourteen teeth (n = 14) included in each protocol. After baseline preoperative data collection, the diagnosis of caries was made depending on the clinical examination and radiographic examination. After cavity preparation was done, all cavities in each protocol were managed with immediate dentin sealing, and the single-bond universal adhesive was applied over all the dentinal surfaces according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protocol One (P1) air abrasion was used for immediate dentin sealing before cementation. In the second protocol (P2), the dentin was sealed without the use of air abrasion. Postoperative sensitivity (POS) was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, one day after the cavity preparation (T1), one-week post-cementation of the indirect composite restoration (T2), after 3 months (T3), and after 12 months (T4).
Statistical analysis used: The normality of distribution parameters was evaluated by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov first, and then, for nonparametric distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis Test was used to test the interaction between different variables. followed by the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the two groups.
Results: Despite air abrasion's effect, there was no statistically significant change in scores between the P1 and P2 groups. Postoperative sensitivity was highest at T1, then T2, T3, and T4. Statistically, these differences were significant (P 0.001). No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were found between T2, T3, and T4 with or without air abrasion.
Conclusion: Air abrasion during cementation of indirect resin restorations does not affect postoperative sensitivity after immediate dentin sealing.
Keywords: Immediate dentin sealing, Air abrasion, surface treatment, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Postoperative sensitivity.
Key Messages: Air abrasion applied to immediate dentin sealing can be used safely without affecting postoperative sensitivity.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: A 3-year study. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(1):65-71. PMid:18551219
Duquia Rde C, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, de V Habekost L, Conceição EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: In vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent. 2006;31(6):682-7. http://doi.org/10.2341/05-132 PMid:17153977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/05-132
Duarte S Jr., de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(1):1-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0 PMid:19573687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0
Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(1):9-18. PMid:11203615
Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19(6):625-8, 630, 632 passim. PMid:9693518
Jud C, Schaff F, Zanette I, Wolf J, Fehringer A, Pfeiffer F. Dentinal tubules revealed with X-ray tensor tomography. Dent Mater. 2016;32(9):1189-95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.021 PMid:27424269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.021
Sahin C, Cehreli ZC, Yenigul M, Dayangac B. In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):401-8. http://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-217 PMid:22673465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-217
Lan WH, Lee BS, Liu HC, Lin CP. Morphologic study of Nd: YAG laser usage in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod. 2004;30(3):131-4. http://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200403000-00001 PMid:15055427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200403000-00001
Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Postcementation hypersensitivity: Scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions. J Prosthodont. 2003;12(2):73-81. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00010-X PMid:12964679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00010-X
Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent. 1992;17(1):13-20. PMid:1437680
Helvey GA. Adhesive dentistry: The development of immediate dentin sealing/selective etching bonding technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(9):22, 24-32, 34-5. PMid:22167928
Ashy LM, Marghalani H, Silikas N. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptations of ceramic inlay restorations associated with immediate vs delayed dentin sealing techniques. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(1):48-55. http://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6372 PMid:31860913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6372
Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(6):511-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010 PMid:16316797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
Dillenburg AL, Soares CG, Paranhos MP, Spohr AM, Loguercio AD, Burnett LH Jr. Microtensile bond strength of prehybridized dentin: Storage time and surface treatment effects. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):231-7. PMid:19603587
Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: A fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):144-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005. tb00103.x PMid:15996383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e11-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.157 PMid:20018362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.157
Canay S, Kocadereli I, Ak”ca E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(1):15-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70243-5 PMid:10629515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5
Sinjari B, Santilli M, D’Addazio G, Rexhepi I, Gigante A, Caputi S, et al. Influence of dentine pre-treatment by sandblasting with aluminum oxide in adhesive restorations. An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(13):3026. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma13133026 PMid:32645819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13133026
Black RB. Technic for nonmechanical preparation of cavities and prophylaxis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1945;32(15):955-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1945.0129
Abate PF, Molina MJ, Macchi RL. Adhesion of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2001;14(1-2):14-7.
Borsatto MC, Catirse AB, Palma Dibb RG, Nascimento TN, Rocha RA, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(3):175-8. http://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402002000300006 PMid:12428591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402002000300006
Chinelatti MA, Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Ribeiro LF, Rocha RA, Palma-Dibb RG. Analysis of surfaces and adhesive interfaces of enamel and dentin after different treatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(7):1465-70. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0084-z PMid:17387595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0084-z
Motisuki C, Monti Lima L, Emi Sanabe M, Jacques P, Santos- Pinto L. Evaluation of the microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration in dentin prepared with different sizes of aluminum oxide particles, using the air abrasion system. Minerva Stomatol. 2006;55(11-12):611-8.
Hegde VS, Khatavkar RA. A new dimension to conservative dentistry: Air abrasion. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(1):4-8. http://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.62632 PMid:20582212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.62632
Pagani C, Feitosa FA, Esteves SR, de Miranda GM, Antunes DP, de Carvalho RF. Dentin hypersensitivity: Pre-hybridization as an alternative treatment. Braz Dent Sci. 2013;16(3):18-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2013.v16i3.902
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200-7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 PMid:23295957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Hu J, Zhu Q. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on preventive treatment for post cementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(1):49-52. PMid:20234892
D’Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M, et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-24. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8 PMid:23695612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8
Derchi G, Marchio V, Borgia V, Özcan M, Giuca MR, Barone A. Twelve-year longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded indirect composite resin inlays. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(6):448-54. http://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a42477 PMid:31086853
Farhadifard H, Rezaei-Soufi L, Farhadian M, Shokouhi P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to old composite. Biomater Res. 2020;24(1):20. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-020-00199-y PMid:33292632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-020-00199-y
Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(7):547. http://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070547 PMid:28773669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070547
Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite-a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):648-55. http://doi.org/10.2341/08-098-C PMid:19953773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/08-098-C
Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Thomaidis S, Doukoudakis S. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2005;18(4):291-5. PMid:16296439
Magne P, Belser U. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. A Biomimetic Approach. Carol Stream (IL): Quintessence; 2002. p. 58-64.
Lin CP, Douglas WH. Structure-property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin-enamel junction. J Dent Res. 1994;73(5):1072-8. http://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730050901 PMid:8006234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730050901
Swift EJ Jr. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restorat Dent. 2009;21(1):62-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00232.x
Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review. Am J Dent. 2015;28(6):321-32. PMid:26846037
Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(4):240-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.001 PMid:27131858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.001
Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26(7):555-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00042-0 PMid:9754743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(12):1621-9. http://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109 PMid:14719760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109
Gordan VV, Mjör IA. Short-and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2002;27(6):543-8. PMid:12413217
de Carvalho MA, Lazari-Carvalho PC, Polonial IF, de Souza JB, Magne P. Significance of immediate dentin sealing and flowable resin coating reinforcement for unfilled/lightly filled adhesive systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(1):88-98. http://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12700 PMid:33404184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12700
Choi Y, Lee EJ, Kim MS. Effect of different immediate dentin sealing techniques on the microtensile bond strength. Oral Biol Res. 2017;41(2):63-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.41.02.201706.63
Sauro S, Pashley DH. Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches-state of the art. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:39-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.014
Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: Thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent. 2005;30(6):747-57. PMid:16382598
Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):44-52. http://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126240 PMid:24966745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126240
Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111(1):73-80. http://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00004.x PMid:12558811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00004.x
Yassen AA, Haridy MF. Influence of immediate dentin sealing technique on the interfacial quality of the indirect ceramic restoration. Egypt Dent J. 2018;64(3):2433-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.76821
Rocca GT, Gregor L, Sandoval MJ, Krejci I, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect Class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. “Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations”. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(5):1385-93. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0632-x PMid:22065245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0632-x
van den Breemer CR, Özcan M, Pols MR, Postema AR, Cune MS, Gresnigt MM. Adhesion of resin cement to dentin: Effects of adhesive promoters, immediate dentin sealing strategies, and surface conditioning. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(1):52-63. PMid:30714054
Chermont AB, Carneiro KK, Lobato MF, Machado SM, Silva e Souza Junior MH. Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(3):349-54. http://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015 PMid:20877974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000300015
Yazici AR, Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):248-55. http://doi.org/10.2341/13-221-C PMid:24754716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/13-221-C
Briso AL, Mestrener SR, Delício G, Sundfeld RH, Bedran- Russo AK, de Alexandre RS, et al. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):421-6. http://doi.org/10.2341/06-141 PMid:17910217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/06-141
Browning WD, Blalock JS, Callan RS, Brackett WW, Schull GF, Davenport MB, et al. Postoperative sensitivity: A comparison of two bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2007;32(2):112-7. http://doi.org/10.2341/06-58 PMid:17427818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/06-58
Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Kern M. Comparison of using calcium hydroxide or a dentine primer for reducing dentinal pain following crown preparation: A randomized clinical trial with an observation time up to 30 months. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(4):344-50. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01238.x PMid:15089940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01238.x
Solon-de-Mello M, da Silva Fidalgo TK, Dos Santos Letieri A, Masterson D, Granjeiro JM, Monte Alto RV, et al. Longevity of indirect restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin luting with and without selective enamel etching. A Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(4):327-37. http://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12504 PMid:31207007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12504
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Foad Ahmed, M. S. Farag, M. F. Haridy, A. F. Abo Elezz, A. F. Ghoniem (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
