Influence of Heliobond on Microtensile Bond Strength of a New BIS-GMA Free Versus BIS-GMA Containing Composite Resin Restoration

Labib Elsebaey; Weam Dowidar; Bader Alahmed; Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2023.11705

Authors

Labib Elsebaey Department of Operative Dentistry, Nahda University, Beni-Suief, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3898-3981
Weam Dowidar Departmant of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Bader Alahmed General Practitioner Dentist, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7895-7295
Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch, Assiut, Egypt; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Vision College for Dentistry and Nursing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-5900

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11705

Keywords:

Microtensile bond strength, Free Bis-GMA resin composite (Admira), Bis-GMA containing resin composite (Grandio), Heliobond

Abstract

AIM: The main objective of this study was to assess the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) of a free bisphenol-a-diglycidyl-ether-dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA) resin composite restorative material compared to a Bis-GMA-containing resin composite following the application of a hydrophobic coating (heliobond).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A flat occlusal dentin surface was exposed in a total of eighty extracted teeth that were removed for periodontal reasons. Teeth were divided into two main equal groups according to the type of applied filling materials: BIS-GMA-free versus BIS-GMA-containing resin composite (n = 40). Each main group was subdivided into two equal subgroups (n = 20) according to the application of Heliobond (hydrophobic resin coating). Heliobond has been applied after adhesive application and before resin composite application. The first group was restored by a Free Bis-GMA Resin Composite (Admira, Voco, Germany); the second group was restored by a Bis- GMA-containing resin composite (Grandio, Voco, Germany). Each tested restorative material was applied and cured according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RESULTS: Regardless of different composite and adhesive types, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) among all subgroups. Specimens with Heliobond recorded a higher µTBS mean value (30.46 ± 6.7 megapaskal [MPa]) than groups without Heliobond, which recorded µTBS mean value (23.95 ± 9.02 MPa).

CONCLUSION: Application of an extra hydrophobic layer coating (Heliobond) has improved the performance of the µTBS of the adhesive systems utilized with the new BIS-GMA-free versus BIS-GMA-containing composite resin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Author Biography

Weam Dowidar, Departmant of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Lecturer, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

References

Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994;10(4):236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 PMid:7664990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1

Hamoudaa IM, Shehatab SH. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials. J Biomed Res. 2011;25(6):418-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60055-9 PMid:23554719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60055-9

Fu J, Liu W, Hao Z, Wu X, Yin J, Panjiyar A, et al. Characterization of a low shrinkage dental composite containing bismethylene spiroorthocarbonate expanding monomer. Int J Mole Sci. 2014;15(2):2400-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022400 PMid:24518683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022400

Mousavinasab SM, Ghasemi M, Yadollahi M. Evaluation of enamel and dentinal microleakage in Class II silorane-based and methacrylate-based resin composite restorations using specific and nonspecific adhesives. J Dent (Tehran). 2018;15(4):240-9. PMid:30405733

Rajeev V, Arunachalam R, Nayar S, Arunima PR, Ganapathy S. “Ormocer an innovative technology”: A replacement for conventional cements and veneer? A comparative in vitro analysis. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(1):58-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_113_16 PMid:28435367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_113_16

Nikaido T, Kunzelmann K, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox C, et al. The in vitro dentin bond strengths of two adhesive systems in Class I cavities of human molars. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):31-9. PMid:12071627

O’Keefe KL, Powers JM. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(5):451-6. PMid:12066641

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res.

;66(11):1636-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601 PMid:10872397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601

Puy MC, Navarro L, Llacer VJ, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: A study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(6):429-33. PMid:8234649

Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128(5):573-81. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0256 PMid:9150640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0256

Zarella BL, Cardoso CA, Pela VT, Kato MT, Tjaderhane L, Buzalaf MA. The role of matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine-cathepsins on the progression of dentine erosion. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(9):1340-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.06.011 PMid:26134516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.06.011

Burrow MF, Tagami J, Negishi T, Nikaido T, Hosoda H. Early tensile bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems. J Dent Res. 1994;73(2):522-8. doi:10.1177/00220345940730020701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730020701

Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(3):161-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5 PMid:15856343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5

Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):211-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012 PMid:16494937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012

Toman M, Toksavul S, Akin A. Bond strength of all-ceramics to tooth structure: Using new luting systems. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(5):373-8. PMid:19058683

Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schläpfer R, Hämmerle C, Fischer J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater. 2008;24(7):944-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.021 PMid:18190957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.021

Lührs AK, Guhr S, Günay H, Geurtsen W. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements with etch and rinse adhesives to enamel and dentin in vitro. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14(2):193-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0279-z PMid:19430821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0279-z

Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater. 2007;23(7):829-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.023 PMid:16934865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.023

Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(3):326-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x PMid:19583763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x

Hitz T, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Are self- adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Dent Mater. 2012;28(11):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.006 PMid:22999370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.006

Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(6):906-14. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.906 PMid:18203498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.906

Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res. 2008;87(10):974-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701012 PMid:18809754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701012

Cantoro A, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Mazzitelli C, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Effect of pre-cure temperature on the bonding potential of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater. 2008;24(5):577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.012 PMid:17659770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.012

De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. Testing bond strength: A review if the literature. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e139-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.109

Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Apicella D, Sedda M, Magni E, Ferrari M. Influence of resin composite mechanical properties on adhesive microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(4):323-31. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a19664 PMid:20978638

Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):117-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8 PMid:8621032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8

Russo DS, Pierleoni F, Buti J, Ferrari M, Giachetti L. In vitro comparison of bonding effectiveness of different adhesive strategies. Am J Dent. 2014;27(6):324-29. PMid:25707087

Siqueira FS, Cardenas AM, Ocampo JB, Hass V, Bandeca MC, Gomes JC, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):121-32. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40300 PMid:29675512

Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41(5):404-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 PMid:23499568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001

Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(3):525-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004 PMid:25797702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004

Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/ enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) approach. Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):133-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015 PMid:28007396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015

Muller K. Vergleichende Rem-Und Clsm-Studie zur Darstellung der Nanoleakage Innerhalb des Hybridverbundes Zwischen Komposit Und Dentin. Vol. 24. Heidelberg: MEDDIS; 2001. p. 181-8.

El-Askary FS, Salah M, Anwar MN, Özcan M. Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer resin restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(3):310-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1215012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1215012

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagaruna A. Single- step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30(7-8):371-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00064-7 PMid:12554121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7

Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resin-dentinbonds. J Dent. 2007;35(5):371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.005 PMid:17196319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.005

Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Four-year water degradation of a total- etch and two self- etching adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent.

;36(8):611-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.011 PMid:18514996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.011

Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, et al. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent. 2008;36(8):309-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.018 PMid:18353520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.018

Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, et al. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(7):877-85. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0281 PMid:19571051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0281

Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH. Diffusion- induced water movement within resin-dentin bonds during bonding. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;79(2):453-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30562 PMid:16649183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30562

Ye Q, Spencer P, Wang Y, Misra A. Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties, and structure in model dentin adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(2):342-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30890 PMid:17001655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30890

Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Regalheiro R. Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6-month water storage. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(5):345-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00531.x PMid:23025319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00531.x

Gunwal MK, Shenoi PR, Paranjape T, Dhote S, Tongya R, Kumar M, et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(2):134-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.08.004 PMid:29892536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.08.004

Perdiou AS, Eldin RA, Hajaj KR. A comparative evaluation of stress resistance between nano-hybrid composite and ormocer restorations on posterior teeth-in vitro study. Mater Plastice. 2020;57(1):8-12. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.20.1.5306

Margarit R, Suciu I, Bodnar DC, Grigore M, Scarlatescu SA, Andrei OC, et al. Fracture resistance of mollars with MOD cavities restored with different materials. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2021;26(1):2323-30. https://doi.org/10.25083/rbl/26.1/2323.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25083/rbl/26.1/2323.2330

Taha DG, Abdel-Samad AA, Mahmoud SH. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with Class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(7):579-87. PMID: 21716986

Klauer E, Belli R, Petschelt A, Rombauer U. Mechanical and hydrolytic degradation of an Ormocer®-based Bis-GMA-free resin composite. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23(5):2113-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2651-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2651-3