Visceral Fat Cut-off Points for a Sample of Egyptian Adults

Authors

  • Nayera Hassan National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Sahar El-Masry National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Mohamed El Hussieny National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Rokia El-Banna National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Safenaz El Sherity National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Ebrahim Ebrahim National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Mohamed Metkees National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622
  • Wesam Ahmed National Research Centre - Biological Anthropology, ElBuhose street, Dokki, Giza, Cairo 12622

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2013.002

Keywords:

Obesity, Visceral fat, Waist circumference, Body mass index, Ultrasound.

Abstract

Objective: To determine appropriate visceral fat cut-off values using ultrasound (USVF); for obesity according to existing waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio (WHR) and BMI cut-off levels.

Methods: 998 Egyptian adults, aged 25- 55 years, were studied in a cross-sectional survey for evaluation of “Visceral and Central Obesity as an Early Estimator for Obesity Health Riskâ€.

Results:  Using WC as standard for classification of  central obesity, cut-off points of USVF were found to be 6.5 cm for men and 5 cm for women; using ROC analysis; with 76 % sensitivity, 83% specificity, 1.06 PPV/NPV, and 81% accuracy for men, and with 77 % sensitivity, 76% specificity, 0.99 PPV/NPV, and 76% accuracy for women. Same cut-off points of USVF were detected using BMI as standard; with 71 % sensitivity, 77% specificity, 1.04 PPV/NPV, and 75% accuracy for men, and 74% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 1.03 PPV/NPV, and 77% accuracy for women. Even by using WHR as standard, these cut-offs increased 0.5 cm only for both men and women (7 and 5.5 cm respectively).

Conclusion: The best cut-off points of visceral fat; using US in Egyptian adults; is 6.5 cm for men and 5 cm for women.en

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Semiz S, Ozgren E, Sabir N. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007; 31(1):53-8.

Hamdy O, Porramatikul S, Al-Ozairi E. Metabolic obesity: the paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2006; 2 (4): 367-73.

Blüher M. The distinction of metabolically 'healthy' from 'unhealthy' obese individuals. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010; 21(1):38- 43.

Slentz CA, Houmard JA, Kraus WE. Exercise, abdominal obesity, skeletal muscle, and metabolic risk: evidence for a dose response. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17(Suppl 3): S27-33.

Xu L, KATASHIMA Mitsuhiro, YASUMASU Takeshi, and LI Ke Ji. Visceral Fat Area, Waist Circumference and Metabolic Risk Factors in Abdominally Obese Chinese Adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2012; 25(2):141-148.

Medina-Lezama J, Pastorius CA, Zea-Diaz H, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Corrales-Medina F, Morey-Vargas OL, Chirinos DA, Muñoz-Atahualpa E, Chirinos-Pacheco J, Chirinos JA; PREVENCION Investigators. Optimal definitions for abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome in Andean Hispanics: the PREVENCION study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1385-8.

Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R."Waist circumference and not body mass, index explains obesity-related health risk." Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(3):379–84.

Berker D, Koparal S, Işik S, Paşaoğlu L, Aydin Y, Erol K, Delibaşi T, Güler S. Compatibility of different methods for the measurement of visceral fat in different body mass index strata. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010;16(2):99-105.

Hirooka M, Kumagi T, Kurose K, et al. A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ul-trasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography. In-tern Med. 2005; 44:794–9.

Hiernaux, J. and J.M. Tanner, 1969. ‘Growth and physical studies’, In J.S. Weiner, S.A. Lourie (Eds.), Human Biology: A guide to field methods. London: IBP; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998; 68:899 –917.

Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference for indicating need for weight management. Br Med J. 1995;311: 158–61.

Jelcić J, Korsić M. Obesity as a medical and public health problem. Lijec Vjesn. 2009; 131(9-10):279-85.

Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000; 21:697–738.

Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, Stern MP. Waist circumference as the best predictor of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared to body mass index, waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans—a 7-year prospective study. Obes Res. 1997; 5:16–23.

Rezende F, Rosado L, Franceschinni S, Rosado G, Ribeiro R, Marins JCB. Revisão crítica dos métodos disponíveis para avaliar a composição corporal em grandes estudos populacionais e clínicos. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2007; 57(4): 327-34.

Maynard LM, Wisemadle W, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Siervogl RM (2001): Childhood boody composition in relation to body mass index .Pediatrics. 107: 344-350.

OK Y, Rhee YK, Park TS, Cha YS. Comparisons of obesity assessments in over-weight elementary students using anthropometry, BIA, CT and DEXA. Nutr Res Pract. 2010;4(2):128-35

Doyle SL, Anne Marie Bennett, Claire L. Donohoe, Ann Marie Mongan, Julia M. Howard, Fiona E. Lithander, Graham P. Pidgeon, John V. Reynolds, Joanne Lysaght. Establishing computed tomography–defined visceral fat area thresholds for use in obesity-related cancer research. Nutrition Research. 2013; 3(3): 171–179.

Vlachos LS, Hatziioannou A, Perelas A, Perrea1 DN. Sonographic Assessment of Regional Adiposity. AJR. 2007; 189:1545-1553.

Pineau JC, Guihard-Costa AM, Bocquet M. Validation of ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement. A comparison between ultra-sound techniques, air displacement plethysmog-raphy and bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-en-ergy X-ray absorptiometry. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;51:421–7.

Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intraabdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990; 18:563–567.

Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993; 17:209–214.

Tornaghi G, Raiteri R, Pozzato C, et al. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994; 18:771–775.

Abe T, Kawakami Y, Sugita M, Yoshikawa K, Fukunaga T. Use of B-mode ultrasound for visceral fat mass evaluation: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Human Sci. 1995; 14:133–139.

Pontiroli AE, Pizzocri P, Giacomelli M, et al. Ultrasound measurement of visceral and subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients before and after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comparison with computerized tomography and with anthropometric measurements. Obes Surg. 2002; 12:648–651.

Minocci A, Savia G, Lucantoni R, et al. Leptin plasma concentrations are dependent on body fat distribution in obese patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000; 24:1139–1144.

Stolk RP, Meijer R, Mali WP, Grobbee DE, van derGraaf Y. Ultrasound measurements of intraabdominal fat estimate the metabolic syndrome better thando measurements of waist circumference. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77:857–860.

Ribeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Kohlmann O Jr, et al. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2001; 38:713–717.

Kim SK, Kim HJ, Hur KY, et al. Visceral fat thickness measured by Ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79:593–599.

Varghese B, Smrita Swamy, M.A. Srilakshmi, M.J. Santhosh, Gurappa G. Shetty, Kiron Varghese, Chandrakant B. Patil, Shamanna S. Iyengar. Visceral adiposity in young patients with coronary artery disease—a case control study. Indian Heart Journal. 2012; 6403: 284–289.

Leite CC, Wajchenberg BL, Radominski R, Matsuda D, Cerri GG, Halpern A. Intra-abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism 2002; 51:1034–1040.

Hamaqawa k.,Matsumura y.,Kubo T.,et al Abdominal Visceral Fat Thickness Measured by Ultrasonography Predicts the Presence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2010; 36(11): 1769-1775.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-15

How to Cite

1.
Hassan N, El-Masry S, El Hussieny M, El-Banna R, El Sherity S, Ebrahim E, Metkees M, Ahmed W. Visceral Fat Cut-off Points for a Sample of Egyptian Adults. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 15 [cited 2021 Apr. 12];1(1):6-11. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2013.002

Issue

Section

A - Basic Science

Most read articles by the same author(s)