Ultrasonographic Findings in Patients with Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules who underwent Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

Authors

  • Venjamin Majstorov Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.124

Keywords:

thyroid, thyroid nodules, thyroid cancer, ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration cytology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with thyroid nodules represent common problem in daily routine of thyroidologists as well as other medical specialties. Fortunately only small number of thyroid nodules turns out to be malignant. Ultrasound is most frequently used imaging modality in the evaluation of thyroid nodules and certain ultrasonographic features are associated with greater risk for malignancy.

AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of various ultrasonographic findings regarding thyroid malignancy.

METHODS: Between September 2012 and August 2013 a total of 592 patients with 694 nodules were included in the present study. They were evaluated for thyroid nodules as a part of routine work up at outpatient’s unit of Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, UKIM Skopje. In all patients thyroid ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) were performed. Surgically were removed 84 nodules and ultrasonography and cytology data were compared to histology results.

RESULTS: From all examined ultrasonographic features, significant association with malignancy has been found for hypoechogenecity, marked central vascularisation, ultrasound suspicious nodules (including at least two suspicious features) and marginal for presence of microcalcifications. Highest sensitivity was obtained for hypoechogenecity, and highest specificity for microcalcifications and marked central vascularisation.

CONCLUSION: Awareness of the suspicious ultrasound features is mandatory in order to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the vast number of patients with thyroid nodules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:226-231.

http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-3-199702010-00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-3-199702010-00009

Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequence (13MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009; 39:699-706.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x

PMid:19601965

Remonti LR, Kramer CK, Leitao CB, Pinto LC, and Gross J. Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid. 2015;25(5):538-550.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0353

PMid:25747526 PMCid:PMC4447137

Ko HM, Jhu IK, Yang SH, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid. A review of 1,613 cases and correlation with histopathologic diagnoses. Acta Cytol. 2003;47(5):727-32.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000326596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000326596

PMid:14526669

Cai XJ, Valiyaparambath N, Nixon P, Waghorn A, Giles T, Helliwell T. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Cytopathology. 2006;17(5):251-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00397.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00397.x

PMid:16961653

Wong KT, Ahuja AT. Ultrasound of thyroid cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2005;9(5):157-66.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0110

PMid:16361145 PMCid:PMC1665239

Sipos JA. Advances in ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(12):1363-72.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.1608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.1608

PMid:20001718

Coquia SF, Chu LC, Hamper UM. The role of sonography in thyroid cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52(6):1283-94.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.007

PMid:25444106

Cibas ES, and Ali SZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132:658-665.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA DOI: https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA

PMid:19846805

Hong YJ, Son EJ, Kim Jy, et al. Positive predictive values of sonographic features of solid thyroid nodule. Clin Imaging. 2010;34(2):127-33.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.10.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.10.034

PMid:20189077

Xu SY, Zhan WW, and Wang WH. Evaluation of thyroid nodules by a scoring and categorizing method based on sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med. 2015; Oct 27 pii:14.11041.

Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2015;doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020

Seo H, Na DG, Kim JH, Kim KW, and Yoon JW. Ultrasound-based risk stratification for malignancy in thyroid nodules: a four-tier categoriazation system. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(7):2153-62.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3621-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3621-7

PMid:25680723

Wolinski K, Szkudlarek M, Szczepanek-Paulska E, and Ruchala M. Usefulness of different ultrasound features of malignancy in predicting the type of thyroid lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124(3):98-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.2132

Giovanella L, Ceriani L and Suriano S. Lymph Node Thyroglobulin Measurement in Diagnosis of Neck Metastases of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. J Thyroid Res. 2011; doi: 10.4061/2011/621839.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/621839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/621839

Ho AS, Sarti EE, Jain KS, et al. Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AYS/FLUS). Thyroid. 2014;24(5):832-9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2013.0317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2013.0317

PMid:24341462

Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim JA. Thyroid nodules with Bethesda system III cytology: can ultrasonography guide the next step? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3083-3088.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2990-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2990-x

PMid:23700214

Published

2015-11-26

How to Cite

1.
Majstorov V. Ultrasonographic Findings in Patients with Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules who underwent Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2015 Nov. 26 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];3(4):689-93. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2015.124

Issue

Section

B - Clinical Sciences