Construct and Psychometric Properties of a New Version Quality of Life Scale Based on Choice Theory

Shirali Kheramin; Ali Sahebi; Yasaman Ghafaryan Shirazi; Mohammad Malekzadeh; Shila Mohseni; Hamid Reza Ghafarian Shirazi

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.075

Authors

Shirali Kheramin Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
Ali Sahebi William Glasser Institute, Ipswich, Australia
Yasaman Ghafaryan Shirazi Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
Mohammad Malekzadeh Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
Shila Mohseni Islamic Azad University of Yasuj, Yasuj, Iran
Hamid Reza Ghafarian Shirazi Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.075

Keywords:

Quality of life scale, Choice theory, Reality therapy, Needs scale, Psychometrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Choice theory, as a psychopathological model, postulated five basics, genetically and universally, needs. Accordingly, the rate of everybody happiness and quality of life is depended on the number of his needs fulfilling. Although some scales have been constructed to assess basic needs, they have proposed unity of needs for all human.

AIM: The present study was designed to construct a new scale, considering individualisation needs for each person; quality of life scale based on choice theory (QOLSCT).

METHODS: Using cluster sampling, six hundred (49% female and 51% male) postgraduate students were selected. One hundred fifty participants also filled SF-36 and GHQ, and 80 participants refilled QOLSCT with four weeksâ€™ interval again.

RESULTS: Cronbachâ€™s alpha, split-half and test re-test (one month) reliability scores were 0.78, 0.75, and 0.92 successively. The correlation between items and total scores range from 0.36 to 0.72, all with P values â‰¥ 0.0001. Confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory values of goodness-of-fit indices, RMSEA, CFI, NFI and GFI were, 0.05, 0.99, 0.99 and 0.99 respectively. Convergent and divergent validity also showed significant correlations.

CONCLUSION: The result of the present study showed that the new version of quality of life scale based on choice theory could be confirmed. The good level of reliability, fairly goodness of fit indexes, and very good convergent validity support this idea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Baldwin S, Godfrey C, Propper C, editors. Quality of life: Perspectives and policies. Routledge, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422922

Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in developmental disabilities. 1995; 16(1):51-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8

Beaudart C, Reginster JY, Geerinck A, Locquet M, BruyÃ¨re O. Current review of the SarQoLÂ®: a health-related quality of life questionnaire specific to sarcopenia. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2017; 17(4):335-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2017.1360768 PMid:28749192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2017.1360768

Bowling A. Measuring health. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2004.

Diener E, Scollon CN, Lucas RE. The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. InAssessing well-being 2009 (pp. 67-100). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4

Shin DC, Johnson DM. Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social indicators research. 1978; 5(1-4):475-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352944

Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of life Research. 2004; 13(2):299-310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 PMid:15085902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00

Van Knippenberg FC, De Haes JC. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: psychometric properties of instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1988; 41(11):1043-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90073-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90073-X

Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Gotay CC, Korn EL, McCabe MS, Moore TD, Cheson BD. Quality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: research issues in protocol development. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1992; 84(8):575-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.8.575 PMid:1556768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.8.575

Post M. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. 2014; 20(3):167-80. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2003-167 PMid:25484563 PMCid:PMC4257148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2003-167

Robinson PG, Carr AJ, Higginson IJ. How to choose a quality of life measure. Quality of Life. London: BMJ Books, 2003:88-100. PMCid:PMC4953373

Schumacher M, Olschewski M, Schulgen G. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1991; 10(12):1915-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780101207 PMid:1805318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780101207

Glasser W. Control theory in the classroom. Perennial Library/Harper & Row Publishers, 1986.

Glasser W. The choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom (Kim, IJ & Woo, AR Trans). Seoul: Korea counseling center, 1998.

Glasser W. Counseling with choice theory: The new reality therapy. 2001. Retrieved August 24, 2006.

Glasser W, Glasser C. The language of choice theory. Harper Collins, 2010.

Wubbolding RE. Reality therapy for the 21st century. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203768457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203768457

Glasser W. Unhappy teenagers: A way for parents and teachers to reach them. Harper Collins, 2002.

Mehrabi S, Shirhzi HG, Rasti M. Normal serum prostate specific antigen levels in men in Yasuj province, Islamic Republic of Iran/Taux serique normal d'antigene specifique de la prostate chez les hommes de la province de Yasuj en Republique islamique d'Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2007; 13(5);1190-1195. https://doi.org/10.26719/2007.13.5.1190 PMid:18290413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26719/2007.13.5.1190

Burns MK, Vance D, Szadokierski I, Stockwell C. Student Needs Survey: A Psychometrically Sound Measure of the Five Basic Needs. International Journal of Reality Therapy. 2006; 25(2).

Glasser W. Reality therapy in action. HarperCollins Publishers, 2000.

Harvey VS, Retter K. The development of the Basic Needs Survey. Journal of Reality Therapy, 1995.

Huffstetler BC, Mims SH, Thompson CL. Getting Together and Staying Together: Testing the Compatibility of the Need-Strength Profile and the Basic Needs Inventory. International Journal of Reality Therapy. 2004; 23(2).

LaFond, B., Glasser's reality therapy approach to relationships: Validation of a Choice Theory Basic Needs Scale (William Glasser), 2000.

Mason D, Palmer C, Duba D, Jill D. Using reality therapy in schools: Its potential impact on the effectiveness of the ASCA national model. International journal of reality therapy. 2009; 29(2):5.

Sing KW, Jusoh AJ. Validity and Reliability of Basic Needs Questionnaire Based on Choice Theory in Malaysia.

Frisch MB. The Quality of Life Inventory: A cognitive-behavioral tool for complete problem assessment, treatment planning, and outcome evaluation. Behavior Therapist. 1993; 16:42-4.

Frisch MB. Use of the Quality of Life Inventory in problem assessment and treatment planning for cognitive therapy of depression. InComprehensive casebook of cognitive therapy 1992 (pp. 27-52). Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9777-0_3

Ren XS, Kazis L, Meenan RF. Shortâ€form Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2: tests of reliability and validity among patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 1999; 12(3):163-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<163::AID-ART3>3.0.CO;2-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<163::AID-ART3>3.0.CO;2-Z

Sawatzky R, Ratner PA, Johnson JL, Kopec JA, Zumbo BD. Self-reported physical and mental health status and quality of life in adolescents: a latent variable mediation model. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2010; 8(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-17 PMid:20128913 PMCid:PMC2829530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-17

Mirzaei A, Toori MA, Mirzaei N, Shirazi RG. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antimutogenic potential of 4 Iranian medicinal plants. Life Sci J. 2013; 10(7):1085-91.

Cohen SR, Sawatzky R, Russell LB, Shahidi J, Heyland DK, Gadermann AM. Measuring the quality of life of people at the end of life: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaireâ€“Revised. Palliative medicine. 2017; 31(2):120-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316659603 PMid:27412257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316659603

Stanton JM, Sinar EF, Balzer WK, Smith PC. Issues and strategies for reducing the length of selfâ€report scales. Personnel Psychology. 2002; 55(1):167-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x

Frisch MB. QOLI: Quality of life inventory: Manual and treatment guide. National Computer Systems, 1994. PMCid:PMC303034

Nabavizadeh SH, Malekzadeh M, Mousavizadeh A, Shirazi HR, Ghaffari P, Karshenas N, Malekzadeh T, Zoladl M. Retrospective study of factors related to preterm labor in Yasuj, Iran. International journal of general medicine. 2012; 5:1013. PMid:23271920 PMCid:PMC3526874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S33385

Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological medicine. 1979; 9(1):139-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644

Brown FG. Principles of educational and psychological testing. Wadsworth Pub Co., 1983.

Spector PE. Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction Sage. Newbury Park, CA., 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986038

Ali M, Nazir H, Banafshe A, Mohsen M, Fateme G, Hamidreza GS. Prevalence of dementia in Boyerahmad county of Iran. Life Science Journal-Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition. 2012; 9(3):1312-4.

Hashemi SN, Shirazi HG, Mohammadi A, Zadeh-Bagheri GH, Noorian KH, Malekzadeh M. Nortriptyline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a six-month, double-blind clinical trial. Clinical pharmacology: advances and applications. 2012; 4:1. PMid:22359466 PMCid:PMC3284259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S23831

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions. 1993; 154:136.

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999; 6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage, 2013.

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill New York, Vol. 7, 1993.

Furr M. Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd., 2011. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287866

Jum N. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315812274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315812274

Abad NH, Najafi Shala Doulatabad AM, Srazi HR. Treatment of Visual Hallucinations in Schizophrenia by Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: a case report. Iranian journal of psychiatry. 2011; 6(4):161. PMid:22952543 PMCid:PMC3395955

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, MÃ¼ller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online. 2003; 8(2):23-74.

Vandenberg RJ. Introduction: Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Where, Pray Tell, Did They Get This Idea? Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105285506