Functional Outcome of Elbow Kinematics in Radial Head Excision Versus Radial Head Replacement: A Comparative Study

Ayush Kumar Singh; Aswini Jidge; Ujwal Ramteke; Nivedhitha Venkateswaran; Hemlata Rokade; SM Mulje; Sunirmal Mukherjee; Abhinandan Kotian

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.305

Authors

Ayush Kumar Singh Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Aswini Jidge Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Ujwal Ramteke Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Nivedhitha Venkateswaran Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Hemlata Rokade Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
SM Mulje Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Sunirmal Mukherjee Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Abhinandan Kotian Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Metropolitan Borough of Wigan, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.305

Keywords:

Radial Head Excision, Radial Head Replacement, Mayo Score

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radial head fractures are quite common with incidence 1.5-4% of all adult fractures. The treatment for these fractures depends upon age, type of injury and whether the physics is closed or not.

AIM: Comparison between radial head excision versus radial head replacement based on mayo elbow scoring in comminuted radial head fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We did a prospective comparative study comprising 32 patients between age 22-60 years with Mason type II/III radial head fractures at Sir J.J Group of Hospitals, Mumbai. The patients were randomised using the admission day of the week placing 17 patients in the arthroplasty group and 15 patients in the excision group. The patients were followed up for 18-24 months (average 20 months) postoperatively. Results were analysed by the Mayoâ€™s elbow performance score at 6 months and 18 months and were statistically evaluated by unpaired t-test.

RESULTS: At 6 months, radial head arthroplasty gave excellent results in 2 patients, good in 5 patients and fair in 8 patients. In excision, there were 5 patients with excellent results at 6 months, 7 with good results and 2 with fair results. At 18 months, of the 17 patients who had undergone head arthroplasty, 2 had excellent results, and the same number had poor results. 7 (46.7%) of the 15 cases who had undergone radial head excision had excellent results. Good results were obtained in 7 cases of each. There was 6 cases (35.3%) of radial head arthroplasty which fell into the fair group. As per Mayoâ€™s score at 6 months follow up, mean and standard deviation (SD) of the scores in arthroplasty was 68.82 and 18.66 respectively & for excision, it was 85.66 and 10.66. At 18 months follow up, it was 75 and 14.89 for arthroplasty & 90.66 and 7.98 for excision. The difference between the results was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: Our study shows that long and short-term results of radial head excision are better as compared to arthroplasty in comminuted radial head fractures based on mayo elbow scoring, particularly for dominant upper limbs.