Assessment of the Quality of Life for Gynecologic Cancer Patients Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G) Questionnaire at Haji Adam Malik Hospital

Authors

  • Deri Edianto Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rizki Yaznil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Ade Ayu Chartyansari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Iman Helmi Effendi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.391

Keywords:

Gynaecological Cancer, FACT-G Questionnaire, modalities, duration of treatment, disease stage

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, successful treatment of cancer is not only measured by 5-years survival rate, but also by the patient’s quality of life (QOL). Delayed in the seeking of cancer treatment resulted in high morbidity and impact on the quality of life.

AIM: This study aims to assess the QOL of patients with gynecologic cancer after therapy. The results of this research can be used as a basis for cancer treatment that should be holistic, not only to eradicate the disease, but also improve QOL.

METHODS: A total of 47 respondents who went to the Department of Oncology, Haji Adam Malik Hospital Medan from May to October 2015 were asked to fill out the FACT-G questionnaire for the QOL assessment. The patient’s personal and disease data was taken from the medical records. The data were analysed statistically by one-way ANOVA test.

RESULTS: The results showed that the physical, social, emotional and functional of cancer patients were not much different based on the variables studied. The QOL was higher in patients with endometrial cancer compared with other types of cancer. The QOL was also higher in patients who had completed treatment (> 6 months) and early-stages cancer. There was no statistical difference between the QOL of patients with gynecologic cancer based on therapeutic modalities, duration of treatment and the stage of disease (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: This current study found the QOL, physical, and emotional complaints are still encountered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures. Atlanta: American cancer society, 2012. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2012.html

Aziz MF. Gynecological Cancer in Indonesia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 20(1):8-10. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2009.20.1.8 PMid:19471661 PMCid:PMC2676491

Cella DF. Measuring the quality of life in palliative care. Semin Oncol. 1995; 22(2 Suppl 3):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343916 PMid:7697298

Akkuzu G. Quality of Life Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Compared to Healthy Check Up Women. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 22(2):103-9. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.103 PMid:21860736 PMCid:PMC3152750

Wilalak S, Lertkhachonsuk AA, Lohacharoenvanich N, Luengsukcharoen SC, Jirajaras M, Likitanasombat P, Sirilerttrakul S. Quality of Life Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Compared to Healthy Check Up Women. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 22(2):103-9. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2011.22.2.103 PMid:21860736 PMCid:PMC3152750

Jorge LLR, da Silva SR. Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Gynecological Cancer Patients Submitted to Anti Neoplastic Chemotherapy. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010; 18(5):849-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692010000500003 PMid:21120402

Usta YY, Importance of social support in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13(8):3569-72. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.8.3569 PMid:23098436

Karabinis G, Koukourikos K, Tsaloglidou A. Psychological Support and Quality of Life in Patients with Gynecological Cancer. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015; 3(11):2992-7. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150948

Macmillan Cancer Support. Worried Sick: The Emotional Impact of Cancer. Opinion Leader Research; 2006.

Erekson EA, Yip SO, Ciarleglio MM, Fried TR. Post Operative Complications after Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(4):785-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822dac5d PMid:21934441 PMCid:PMC3178335

Viswanathan AN, Lee LJ, Eswara JR, Horowitz NS, Konstantinopoulos PA, Mirabeau-Beale KL, Rose BS, von Keudell AG, Wo JY. Complications of pelvic radiation in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies. Cancer. 2014; 120(24):3870-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28849 PMid:25056522

Putri RE, Sahil MF, Edianto D. Kanker Serviks RSUP. H. Adam Malik Medan 2008-2012: Karakteristik Modalities Terapi, dan Luaran Pasien, 2012.

Published

2019-07-14

How to Cite

1.
Edianto D, Yaznil MR, Chartyansari AA, Effendi IH. Assessment of the Quality of Life for Gynecologic Cancer Patients Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G) Questionnaire at Haji Adam Malik Hospital. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 14 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];7(16):2569-73. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2019.391

Issue

Section

Neuroscience, Neurology, and Psychiatry

Most read articles by the same author(s)