A Case of Allergic Dermatitis after Self-Treatment with Propolis: Case Report

Monika Fida; Suela Kellici; Mehmet Hoxha; Etleva Qirko

doi:10.3889/oamjms.2013.017

Authors

Monika Fida Faculty of Medicine - Dermatology, Tirana
Suela Kellici Faculty of Medicine, Pharmaceutical Department, Tirana
Mehmet Hoxha Faculty of Medicine â€“ Allergology, Tirana
Etleva Qirko Faculty of Medicine â€“ Allergology, Tirana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2013.017

Keywords:

Allergic contact dermatitis, propolis, vesiculo-bullous elements, eczematous elements, medical advice.

Abstract

Background:Â Propolis or bee-glue is used as adjuvant in the therapy because of its antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, anesthetic and antibacterial properties. Propolis is found in a number of products such as cosmetics, shampoos, toothpastes, lip balms, creams and ointments. In dermatology propolis has been used for wound healing, treatment of ulcers and eczema, and regeneration of the skin. The sensitizing properties of propolis have been reported in the literature.

Aim: The aim of this study was to present a case of allergic contact dermatitis after self-treatment with propolis.

Methods: We report a case of 46 years old man who presented severe vesiculo-bullous elements on the leg after the treatment with bee-glue for the eczematous elements.

Results: The diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis to propolis was confirmed due to patch tests.

Conclusions: Here we show that allergic contact dermatitis from propolis should be taken in consideration if an allergic reaction is evident. Dermatologists and general physicians should be aware of propolis as an important allergen that can cause Allergic Contact Dermatitis. The therapeutic use of propolis should be performed under medical advisory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Hausen BM, Wollenweber E, Senff H, Post B. Propolis allergy. Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact Dermatitis. 1987; 17: 163-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb02699.x

Walgrave SE, Warshaw EM, Glesne LA. Allergic contact dermatitis from propolis. Dermatitis. 2005; 16: 209-215.

Ting PT, Silver S. Allergic contact dermatitis to propolis. J Drugs Dermatology. 2004; 3: 685-686.

Ayala F, Lembo G, Nappa P, Balato N. Contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis. 1985; 12: 181-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb01099.x

Raton JA, Aguirre A, Diaz-Perez JL. Contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 22: 183-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb01559.x

Hausen BM, Evers P, Stuwe HT, et al. Propolis allergy (IV). Studies with further sensitizers from propolis and constituents common to propolis, poplar buds and balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis. 1992; 26: 34-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00865.x

Hausen BM, Wollenweber E. Propolis allergy (III). Sensitization studies with minor constituents. Contact Dermatitis. 1988; 19: 296-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02931.x

Hausen BM. Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005). Dermatitis. 2005; 16: 127-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200509000-00007

Schuler TM, Frosch PJ. [Propolis-incuced contact allergy] Hautarzt. 1988; 39: 139-142. [in German].

Susan E. Walgrave, Erin M. Warshaw, Lynn A. Glesne. Allergic contact dermatitis from Propolis. Dermatitis. 2005;16(4):209-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200512000-00004