Free Gingival Graft versus Mucograft: Histological Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.127Keywords:
Gingival recession, Free gingival graft, Mucograft, Elastic fibres, Collagen fibres, Connective tissueAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The correction of the gingival recession is of esthetical and functional significance, but the tissue regeneration can only be confirmed by a histological examination.
AIM: This study aims to make a comparison between the free gingival graft and the autograft.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 24 patients with single and multiple gingival recessions. Twelve patients were treated with a free gingival graft and the other twelve with a micrograft. Six months after the surgical procedure, a micro-punch biopsy of the transplantation area was performed. The tissue was histologically evaluated, graded in 4 categories: immature, mature, fragmented and edematous collagen tissue. The elastic fibres were also examined and graded in three categories: with a normal structure, fragmented rare and fragmented multiplied.
RESULTS: Regarding the type of collagen tissue that was present, there was a significant difference between the two groups of patients, with a larger number of patients treated with a micrograft showing a presence of mature tissue, compared to the patients treated with a free gingival graft. A larger number of patients in both of the groups displayed elastic fibres with a rare fragmented structure; 33.3% of the patients showed a normal structure; 50% demonstrated a normal structure.
CONCLUSION: The patients treated with a free gingival graft showed a larger presence of fragmented collagen tissue and fragmented elastic fibres, whereas a mature tissue was predominantly present in the surgical area where a Geistlich Mucograft was placed.Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araujo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA, Root-coverage procedures for thetreatment of localized recession-type defects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; 15(2):CD007161.
Van Dyke TE. The management of inlamation in periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2008; 79(8 Suppl):1601-1608. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080173 PMid:18673016 PMCid:PMC2563957
Souza SL, Macedo GO, Tunes RS, Silveira e Souza AM, Novaes Jr, AB, Grisi MF et al. Subepitelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in smokers and non smokers: a clinical and histologic controlled study in humans. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (6):1014-1021. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070479 PMid:18533778
Chambrone L, Chambrone D, PustiglioniFE,Chambrone LA, Lima LA, Can subepitelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-typedefect? J Dent. 2008; 36(9):659–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007 PMid:18584934
Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z,Human histology of a new attachment after root coverageusingsubepithelial connective tissue graft, J Clin Periodontol, 2001, 28(7):657–662. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007657.x PMid:11422587
Mcguire MK, Cochran DL,Evaluation of human recessiondefects treated with coronally advanced flaps and eitherenamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histologicalevaluation. J Periodontol. 2003; 74(8):1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1126 PMid:14514225
Raspperini G, Silvestri M, Schenk RK, Nevins ML,Clinicaland histologic evaluation of human gingival recessiontreated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft andenamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20(3):269–275.
Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. Journal of periodontology. 2001; 72(10):1407-12. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407 PMid:11699483
Vitkov L, Krautgartner WD, Hannig M. Surfacemorphology of pocket epithelium. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2005; 29(2):121-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01913120590916832 PMid:16028668
Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, CK, et al. Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography. J periodontol. 2008; 79(3):406-412. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070302 PMid:18315422
Lima RS, Peruzzo DC, Napimoga MH, Saba-Chujfi E, Santos-Pereira SA, Martinez EF. Evaluation of the biological behavior of Mucograft® in human gingival fibroblasts: an in vitro study. Brazilian dental journal. 2015; 26(6):602-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300238 PMid:26963203
Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differentlycross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study inthe rat Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:369–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x PMid:15877758
Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Herten M, Scherbaum Wand Becker J. Biocompatibility of various collagenmembranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts andhuman osteoblast-like cells Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:443–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x PMid:15248879
Harris RJ, Harris LE, Harris CR, Harris AJ. Evaluation of root coverage with two connective tissue grafts obtained from the same location. Int J Periodontol Rest Dent. 2007; 27(4): 333-339.
Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, Agaimy A, Schlegel KA. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. Journal of periodontology. 2013; 84(7):914-23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120084 PMid:23030237
Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Longâ€term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft®) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clinical oral implants research. 2016; 27(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12575
McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. Journal of Periodontology. 2010; 81(8):1108-17. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090698 PMid:20350159
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0