The Effect of the Use of Different Types of Cement and Zirconium Post Systems on Endondontically Treated Teeth

Authors

  • Vesna Jurukovska-Shotarovska Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje
  • Biljana Kapusevska Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopje
  • Biljana Evrosimovska Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, University Clinical Centre Ss Pantelejmon, Skopje

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.326

Keywords:

Zirconium post systems, Multilink Automix cement, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix cement, Pull-out test

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prefabricated zirconium upgrading systems were examined to satisfy aesthetic needs in endodontically treated teeth. Endodontically treated teeth, together with non-metallic posts and superstructure, are substructures that enable the production of prosthetic structures that will allow aesthetics, resulting from normal light transmission. To investigate and analyse the retention of zirconium post systems cemented with RelyX Unicem 2 Automix (RLX) cement with Pull-out test.

AIM: To examine the retention of zirconium post systems, cemented with Multi-Link Automix (MLA) cement and RelyX Unicem 2 Automix (RLX) cement with Pull-out test.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study were used, 120 post systems of the company ZIRIX NORDIN - Switzerland, with different diameters d1 = 1.2, were used: d2 = 1.35, d3 = 1.5, and two types of resin cements: Multilink Automix-Ivoclar (MLA), and RelyX Unicem 2 Automix (RLX) - 3 M ESPE.

RESULTS: The analysis of the extraction force in newtons (N) zirconium post systems of Multilink Automix cement according to subgroups of three diameters is consequently 481.3 ± 1.9 vs 462.9 ± 4.5 vs 454.2 ± 2.2. The analysis of the extraction strength in the newtons (N) zirconium post systems of RelyX Unicem 2 Automix cement in the entire sample is 577.9 ± 6.1 N.

CONCLUSION: The largest diameter of the posts significantly increases the resistance of fractures compared to the smaller two diameters used in the experimental study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

References

Chieruzzi M, Pagano S, Pennacchi M, Lombardo G, D'Errico P, Kenny JM. The compressive and flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced endodontic posts. Journal of Dentistry. 2012; 40:968–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.003 PMid:22917560

Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology. of prefabricated posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004; 17:307–12. PMid:15237877

Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of journalofdentistry 41(2013) 1020–1026endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. Journal of Dentistry. 2012; 40:312–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.006 PMid:22285922

Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dental Materials. 2003; 19:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1

Farina AP, Cecchin D, Barbizam JV, Carlini-Junior B. Influence of endodontic irrigants on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2011; 37:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00249.x PMid:21418411

Lindblad RM, Lassila LV, Salo V, Vallittu PK, Tjaderhane L. One year effect of chlorhexidine on bonding of fibre-reinforced composite root canal post to dentine. Journal of Dentistry. 2012;40:718–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.002 PMid:22580353

Huber L, Cattani-Lorente M, Shaw L, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S. Push-out bond strengths of endodontic posts bonded with different resin-based luting cements. American Journal of Dentistry. 2007; 20:167–72. PMid:17672258

Schirrmeister JF, Kielbassa AM. Coronal leakage of calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers compared with usual sealers. Schweizer Monatsschrift fu¨ r Zahnmedizin. 2006; 116:224–8.

Schirrmeister JF, Kielbassa AM. Coronal leakage of calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers compared with usual sealers. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin. 2006; 116:224–8. PMid:16610457

Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dental Materials. 2009; 25:1411–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.009 PMid:19683808

Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dental Materials. 2009; 25:1411–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.009 PMid:19683808

Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2009; 117:326–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x PMid:19583763

Pilo R, Cardash HS, Levin E, Assif D. Effect of core stiffness on the in vitro fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002; 88:302–6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127909 PMid:12426501

Chiang YC, Rösch P, Dabanoglu A, Lin CP, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization composite shrinkage evaluation with 3D deformation analysis from μCT images. dental materials. 2010; 26(3):223-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.013 PMid:19913900

Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. 2002. International endodontic journal. 2009; 42:401-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01559.x PMid:19356174

Cury AH, Goracci C, Navarro MFL, Carvalho RM,Sadek FT, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of hygroscopicexpansion on the push out resistance of glassionomer based cements used for the luting of glassfibre posts. J Endodont. 2006; 32:537-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.060 PMid:16728245

Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR. Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006; 95:311–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.024 PMid:16616129

Chen D, Wang N, Gao Y, Shao L, Deng B. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis of the restoration ofthe maxillary canine with a complex zirconia post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1406–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.017 PMid:24993379

Almufleh BS, Aleisa KI, Morgano SM. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:957–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.022 PMid:24953755

Elsaka SE. Influence of surface treatments on the surface properties of different zirconia cores and adhesion of zirconia-veneering ceramic systems. Dent Mater. 2013; 27: 165–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.003

Published

2018-09-23

How to Cite

1.
Jurukovska-Shotarovska V, Kapusevska B, Evrosimovska B. The Effect of the Use of Different Types of Cement and Zirconium Post Systems on Endondontically Treated Teeth. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 23 [cited 2024 Apr. 23];6(9):1732-6. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.326

Issue

Section

D - Dental Sciences

Most read articles by the same author(s)