Comparative Analysis of the ʺScholasticʺ Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!

Authors

  • Georgi Tchernev Medical Institute of Ministry of Interior (MVR), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatologic Surgery, General Skobelev Nr 79, Sofia, Bulgaria; Onkoderma-Private Clinic for Dermatologic Surgery, General Skobelev 26 , Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Ivanka Temelkova Onkoderma-Private Clinic for Dermatologic Surgery, General Skobelev 26 , Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.511

Keywords:

One step melanoma surgery, Survival benefits, AJCC recommendations, Two-step melanoma surgery model, Old school, Surgical innovation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) offers a two-stage, often insufficient or so-called variable model of cutaneous melanoma treatment. This model starts with primary excision and an initial operational safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a re-excision with an additional field of operational security, determined by histologically established tumor thickness (with or without removal of SLN). We present a brand new method of melanoma surgery, the so-called One Step melanoma surgery (OSMS), in which cutaneous melanomas (regardless of their thickness) could be removed by single surgical intervention.

CASE REPORT: We describe a case of a patient with cutaneous melanoma, with postoperatively established Breslow’s tumor thickness of 6 mm, operated on the AJCC model within two surgical sessions. The usual primary excision was performed with a surgical safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a secondary excision with an additional surgical security field of 1.2 cm in all directions (due to the patient's wish for the optimal cosmetic result, agreed and approved by the dermatosurgeon performing the manipulation).

CONCLUSION: The two-stage method for the treatment of melanomas is often insufficient due to: 1) the inability (in this case) secondary excision in the face area to be conducted with an additional recommended operational security field of 1.5 cm in all directions; and 2) the patient's wish for a better cosmetic result, which should be achieved with less surgical security field, resulting in a compromise solution for re-excision with an additional surgical field of 1.2 cm in all directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Published

2018-12-18

How to Cite

1.
Tchernev G, Temelkova I. Comparative Analysis of the ʺScholasticʺ Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 18 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];6(12):2369-72. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2018.511

Issue

Section

C- Case Reports

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>