Serial Excision for the Treatment of Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevus: The Vietnamese Way

Authors

  • Son Nguyen Hong National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Nghi Dinh Huu National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Nham Nguyen Duy Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Tuy Than Trong National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Hung Nguyen Bac Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Thuong Nguyen Van National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Son Tran Thiet Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Marco Gandolfi Unit of Dermatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Claudio Feliciani Unit of Dermatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Francesca Satolli Unit of Dermatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Michael Tirant University of Rome G. Marconi, Rome, Italy; Psoriasis Eczema Clinic, Melbourne, Australia
  • Aleksandra Vojvodic Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Military Medical Academy of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Torello Lotti University of Rome G. Marconi, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.058

Keywords:

Melanocytic nevus, Giant congenital melanocytic nevus, Plastic surgery

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of plastic surgery in the treatment of giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN).

METHODS:  We enrolled 20 patients with 44 lesions and performed one of the following procedures: serial excision, skin grafting, tissue expansion, primary skin closure, distant flap, and adjacent flap. We assessed the outcome at 10 days and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS: Of 44 surgical sites, the most commonly used reconstruction surgeries were serial excision (16), skin grafting (16), and tissue expansion (6). Other types were rarely used. All patients with serial excision had good outcome. A total of 81% and 19% of the patients with skin grafting had good and fair outcome, respectively. Around 83% and 17% of the patients with tissue expansion had good and fair outcome. No cases had bad outcome.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion plastic surgery is effective in the treatment of GCMN. There are different techniques but serial excision, skin grafts, and tissue expansion are most commonly used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block

Published

2019-01-26

How to Cite

1.
Nguyen Hong S, Dinh Huu N, Nguyen Duy N, Than Trong T, Nguyen Bac H, Nguyen Van T, Tran Thiet S, Gandolfi M, Feliciani C, Satolli F, Tirant M, Vojvodic A, Lotti T. Serial Excision for the Treatment of Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevus: The Vietnamese Way. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2019 Jan. 26 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];7(2):231-3. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/oamjms.2019.058

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>