Chemical Characterization of Hydrogels Crosslinked with Polyethylene Glycol for Soft Tissue Augmentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.279Keywords:
hydrogels, polyethylene glycol, soft tissue augmentationAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) based hydrogels for esthetic applications found widespread use. HA should be crosslinked for this application to achieve the correct viscoelastic properties and avoid fast degradation by the hyaluronidase enzyme naturally present in the skin: these properties are controlled by the amount of crosslinker and the fraction that is effectively crosslinked (i.e. that binds two HA chains).
AIM: Crosslinking by polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) has been more recently introduced and showed attractive features in terms of viscoelastic properties and reduced biodegradation. Aim of this paper is to define a method for the determination of the crosslinking properties of these recently introduced fillers, method that is lacking at the moment.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: The percentage of crosslinker and the fraction that is effectively crosslinked were determined by proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) and by 13C NMR, respectively. The filler were preliminarily washed with acetonitrile to remove residual PEG and then digested by hyaluronidase to obtain a sample that can be analysed by NMR.
RESULTS: The crosslinking parameters were determined in four samples of NEAUVIA PEG-crosslinked dermal fillers (produced by MatexLab S.p.A., Italy). The percentage of crosslinker was between 2.8% and 6.2% of HA, whereas the effective crosslinker ratios were between 0.07 and 0.16 (ratio between the moles of effectively crosslinked PEG and total moles of PEG). Moreover, a digestion procedure alternative to enzymatic digestion, based on acidic hydrolysis, was successfully tested for the determination of crosslinker percentage.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method successfully determined the two crosslinking parameters in PEG-crosslinked dermal fillers. The estimated percentage of crosslinker is similar to previously reported data for other crosslinkers, whereas the effective crosslinker ratio is lower for PEG crosslinked hydrogels.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64(suppl.):18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010
Huerta-Ãngeles G, NeÅ¡porová K, Ambrožová G, Kubala L, Velebný V. An Effective Translation: The Development of Hyaluronan-Based Medical Products From the Physicochemical, and Preclinical Aspects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00062
Hemshekhar M, Thushara RM, Chandranayaka S, Sherman LS, Kemparaju K, Girish KS. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 86:917-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.032 PMid:26893053
Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(24):4337-4351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5
Santos LF, Correia IJ, Silva AS, Mano JF. Biomaterials for drug delivery patches. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018; 118:49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.03.020 PMid:29572160
Diekjürgen D, Grainger DW. Polysaccharide matrices used in 3D in vitro cell culture systems. Biomaterials. 2017; 141:96-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.020 PMid:28672214
Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HNE, Eccleston GM. Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. J Pharm Sci. 2008; 97(8):2892-2923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21210 PMid:17963217
Jones DH. Semipermanent and Permanent Injectable Fillers. Dermatol Clin. 2009; 27(4):433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2009.08.003 PMid:19850193
Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008; 10(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170701774901 PMid:18330796
Santoro S, Russo L, Argenzio V, Borzacchiello A. Rheological properties of cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2011; 9(2):127-136. https://doi.org/10.5301/JABB.2011.8566
Yeom J, Bhang SH, Kim B-S, et al. Effect of cross-linking reagents for hyaluronic acid hydrogel dermal fillers on tissue augmentation and regeneration. Bioconjug Chem. 2010; 21(2):240-247. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc9002647 PMid:20078098
Zerbinati N, D'Este E, Farina A, Rauso R, Cherubino M, Calligaro A. Morphological evidence following pegylated filler treatment in human skin. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017; 31(2 Suppl. 2):79-85. PMid:28702967
Kenne L, Gohil S, Nilsson EM, et al. Modification and cross-linking parameters in hyaluronic acid hydrogels - Definitions and analytical methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2013; 91(1):410-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.066 PMid:23044151
Zerbinati N, Rauso R, Gonzalez P, et al. In vitro evaluation of collagen production on human fibroblasts treated with hyaluronic acid peg cross-linked with micromolecules of calcium hydroxyapatite in low concentration. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017; 31(Suppl 2):87-90. PMid:28702968
Zerbinati N, Haddad RG, Bader A, et al. A new hyaluronic acid polymer in the augmentation & restoration of labia majora. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017; 31(2 Suppl 2):153-161. PMid:28702976
Zerbinati N, Lotti T, Monticelli D, et al. In vitro evaluation of the sensitivity of a hyaluronic acid PEG cross-linked to bovine testes hyaluronidase. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(1).
Zerbinati N, Lotti T, Monticelli D, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biosafety of hyaluronic acid PEG cross-linked with micromolecules of calcium hydroxyapatite in low concentration. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(1).
Wende FJ, Gohil S, Nord LI, Helander Kenne A, Sandström C. 1D NMR methods for determination of degree of cross-linking and BDDE substitution positions in HA hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 157:1525-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.029 PMid:27987864
Tømmeraas K, Melander C. Kinetics of hyaluronan hydrolysis in acidic solution at various pH values. Biomacromolecules. 2008; 9(6):1535-1540. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm701341y PMid:18452332
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Damiano Monticelli, Virginia Martina, Roberto Mocchi, Raffaele Rauso, Giovanna Cipolla, Nicola Zerbinati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0