Correlation of Fetal Growth Between Last Menstrual Period and third Trimester Ultrasound Pregnancy on Ethnic Minangkabau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8474Keywords:
Fetal growth, Last menstrual period, Ultrasound, Minangkabau ethnicAbstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal growth is a vital thing that determines the quality of life at birth. Because the multinational studies available today represent a very limited choice of a varied world population.
AIM: this study is expected to provide results in the form of more parameters. accurate in determining fetal growth estimates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is an analytical study using a cross sectional approach determine fetal growth biometry in the Minangkabau ethnic group. The selected sample was pregnant women who came to check their pregnancy in December 2020 at Fetomaternal clinic Hospital M. Djamil Padang and Network Hospital in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Andalas University. Bivariate analysis using Pearson correlation test because the data distribution was normally distributed with P value <0,05 and then multivariate analysis using linear regression.
RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty pregnant women who came to check at 3rd trimester (28-40 weeks by US). The characteristics of the research subjects were the average age of pregnant women ranging from 21-39 years with the average was 28.49 ± 4.5 years, parity 1 as many as 203 people (46,7%), and the average level of education at senior high school as many as 431 people (82,9%), and there were 123 working pregnant women (42,5%). Based on the Pearson analysis, Correlation between of each variable BPD, HC, AC, FL, and HL to LMP, there is the strongest correlation between LMP and AC, which is r = 0,799 and the weakest correlation between LMP and HL is r = 0,162, for all variables is very significant (p value 0,000). The multivariate analysis with linear regression, there is a significant value that the simultaneous measurement of biometric variables (BPD, HC, AC, FL, HL) on the LMP would be 84.6% more significant.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation fetal growth between LMP and 3rd trimester ultrasound pregnancy with variable BPD, HC, AC, FL, HL on minangkabau ethnic
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Cunningham FG, Lenovo KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 25th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. p. 1870-87.
ACOG. Nutrition during Pregnancy. United States: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2018.
Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Jensen LN, et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: A multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002220. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220
PMid:28118360
Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, Souza JP, Mori R, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1855-61. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60364-4 PMid:21621717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60364-4
Sletner L, Jenum AK, Yajnik CS, Mørkrid K, Nakstad B, Rognerud-Jensen OH, et al. Fetal growth trajectories in pregnancies of European and South Asian mothers with and without gestational diabetes, a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172946. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172946 PMid:28253366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172946
Melamed N, Ryan G, Windrim R, Toi A, Kingdom J. Choise of formula and accuracy of fetal weight estimation in small for gestional-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(1):71-82. http://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.02058 PMid:26635253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.02058
Depkes RI. Penyakit Penyebab Kematian Bayi Bayi Lahir (Neonatal) dan Sistem Pelayanan Kesehatan Yang Berkaitan Di Indonesia; 2017. Available from: https://www.digilib.litbang.depkes.goid.jakarta [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 10].
Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Fetal biometry and growth. In: Norton PW, Callen ME. Callen’s Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017. p. 118-28.
MacGregor SN, Sabbagha RE. Assessment of gestational age by ultrasound. In: GLOWM: The Global Library of Women’s Medicine; 2008. http://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.10206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.10206
Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perz RG, Carvalho J, Piagio G, et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: Concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S619-29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010 PMid:29422204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010
Mawengkang M. Estimated birth weight based on measurement of biparietal diameter, head circumference, femur length and fetal abdominal circumference. Obst Ginecol Bull. 2013;21(1):16-9.
Hadlock FP, Harris RB, Sharman RS, Peter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurement-a prospectivee study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4 PMid:3881966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4
Beckmann CR, Ling FW, Herbert WN, Laube DW, Smith RP. Fetal growth abnormalities: Intrauterine growth restriction and macrosomia. In: Horowitz L, Ferran A, editors. Beckmann and Ling’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. p. 350-61.
Troe EJ, Raat H, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Looman CW, Moll HA, et al. Explaining Differences in birth-weight between ethnic populations. The Generation R study. BJOG. 2007;114(12):1557-65. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01508.x PMid:17903227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01508.x
Lawande A, di Gravio C, Potdar RD, Sahariah SA, Gandhi M, Chopra H, et al. The Mumbai Maternal Nutrition Project (MMNP); 2018. p. 1-10. Available from: https://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions http://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118799202 [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 13]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118799202
Drooger JC, Troe JW, Borsboom GJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Ethnic diferences in prenatal growth and the assosiation with maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(2):115-22. Available from: https://www.interscience.wiley.com http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1962 [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 13]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1962
Jacquemyn Y, Sys SU, Vedonk P. Fetal biometry in different ethnic group. Early Hum Dev. 2000;57(1):1-13. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00049-3 PMid:10690707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(99)00049-3
Al Marri HM, Ramli RM, Azman NZ, Rahman AA, Al-Yafai J, Al-Saleem A, et al. Fetal Biometry Assessment of Femur Length for Pregnant Women in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. New Jersey, United States: IEEE; 2019. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952045
Ayad CE, Ibrahim AA, Garelnabi ME, Ahmed BH, Abdalla EA, Saleem MA, et al. Assesmen of used formulae for sonographic estimation of fetal sonographic estimation of fetal weight in Sudanese population. Open J Radiol. 2016;6:113-20. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojrad http://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2016.62017 [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 13]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2016.62017
Hadlock FP, Russelli LD, Harris RB, Senung KP. Fetal Abdominal Circumference as a Predictor of Menstrual Age. United States: Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Departement of Biometry, University Texas School of Public Science; 1982. p. 367-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.139.2.367
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yusrawati Yusrawati, Joserizal Serudji, Bobby Indra Utama, Puspita Sari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
