Fracture Localisation of Porcelain Veneers with Different Preparation Designs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.323Keywords:
fracture localization, fracture resistance, porcelain veneersAbstract
BACKGROUND: Porcelain veneers are permanent restorations that combine good aesthetic with functionality by minimal destructive techniques.
AIM: This study aimed to investigate the influence of the preparation designs on the fracture localisation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three preparation designs of porcelain veneers fabricated by a method of laying on a fireproof abutment on maxillary central incisor were examined in this in vitro study-feather preparation, bevel preparation and incisal overlap – palatal chamfer. The samples from all three groups were loaded into a universal test machine-TRITECH WF 10056 until damage occurred on the porcelain veneer. Fracture localisation was classified as an incisal, gingival or combination. Data were analysed with statistical programs: STATISTICA 7.1; SPSS 17.0.
RESULTS: In feather preparation, as a consequence of the mechanical force, the most common is the incisal localisation (66.7%), followed by the combined (33.3%), while the gingival fracture localisation is not registered. In bevel preparation, the most common fracture localisation is combined (53.6%), followed by incisal (35.7%) and subsequent gingival localisation (10.7%). In incisal overlap (palatal chamfer), combined and gingival localisation of the fracture is equally recorded in 14.3% of the samples, while the incisal is the most common localisation and is registered in 72.4%.
CONCLUSION: During the study, a statistically significant dependence was found between the localisation of the occurred changes (incisal, gingival and combination) and the three different types of preparation.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Calamia JR. The current status of etched porcelain veneer restorations. Journal of Philippine Dental Association. 1996; 47:35.
De Boever JA, McCall Jr WD, Holden S, Ash Jr MM. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1978; 40(3):326-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90042-2
Tai-Min Lin, Perng-Ru Liu, Lance C. Ramp, Milton E. Essig, Daniel A. Givan, Yu-Hwa Pan. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2012; (40):202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.008 PMid:22198195
Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, Ferro V, Aversa R, Apicella A. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: A 3d-finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:1178-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.014 PMid:16098574
Alhekeir D, Al-Sarhan R, Al Mashaan A. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2014; 26:63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.003 PMid:25408598 PMCid:PMC4229681
Anusavice KJ. Mechanical properties of dental materials. 'Phillips' science of dental materials'. 2003; 93(11):521-530.
Borba M, Araújo M, Lima E, Yoshimura H, Cesar P, Griggs J, Della Bona A. Flexural strength and failure modes of layered ceramic Structures. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(12):1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.008 PMid:21982199 PMCid:PMC3205330
Seghi RR, Daher T, Caputo A. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 1990; 6:181-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90026-B
Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials.Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8:239-46.
Jones DW. The strength and strengthening mechanisms of dental ceramics. In: Mclean JW, editor. Dental Ceramics: Procedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessance, 1983.
Coyne B, Wilson N. A clinical evaluation of the marginal adaption of porcelain laminate veneers. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 1994; 3:87.
Shaini FJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00545.x PMid:9291247
Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosth Dent. 1993; 70:11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90030-R
Potiket N, Chiche G, Finger IM. Invitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(5):491-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.001 PMid:15523339
Alghazzavi T, Lemons J, Liu P, Essig M, Janowski G. The failure load of CAD/CAM generated zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers with different preparation designs. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2012; 108(6):386-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60198-X
Hui KK, Williams B, Davis EH, Holt RD. A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. British Dental Journal. 1991; 171(2):51-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807602 PMid:1873094
Prasanth V, Harshakumar K, Lylajam S, Chandrasekharan Nair K, Sreelal T. Relation between fracture load and tooth preparation of ceramic veneers - an in vitro study. Health Sciences. 2013; 2(3):1-11.
Hahn P, Gustav M, Hellwig E. An in vitro assessment of the strength of porcelain veneers dependent on tooth preparation. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27(12):1024-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00640.x PMid:11251771
Stappert CF, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(2):132-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.023 PMid:16046967
Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:171-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80009-8
Jankar A.S, Kale Y, Kangane S, Ambekar A, Sinha M, Chaware S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of Ceramic Veneer with three different incisal design preparations - An In-vitro Study. Journal of International Oral Health. 2014; 6(1):48-54.
Mirra A, El-Mahalawy S. Fracture Strength and Microleakage of Laminate Veneers. Cairo Dental Journal. 2009; 25(2):245-54.
Pedlar P, Pedlar L. Preparation design and load-to-failure of ceramic laminate veneers. Prosthodontics newsletter, 2012.
Øilo M, Hardang A, Ulsund A, Gjerdet N. Fractographic features of glassceramic and zirconia-based dental restorations fractured during clinical function Eur J Oral Sci. 2014; 122:238-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12127 PMid:24698173 PMCid:PMC4199274
Rekow ED, Zhang G, Thompson V, Kim JW, Coehlo P, Zhang Y. Effects of geometry on fracture initiation and propagation in all-ceramic crowns. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 88:436-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31133 PMid:18506827
Aboushelib MN, De Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:952-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.036 PMid:16979230
Coelho PG, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Laboratory simulation of Y-TZP all-ceramic crown clinical failures. J Dent Res. 2009; 88:382-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509333968 PMid:19407162 PMCid:PMC3144055
Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: a review. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:495-510. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119581 PMid:11725278
Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of allceramic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999; 81(6):652-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Bona AD. The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater. 2012; 28:41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.001 PMid:22192250
Quinn GD, Hoffman K, Scherrer S, Lohbauer U, Amberger G, Karl M, Kelly JR. Fractographic analysis of broken ceramic dental restorations. In: Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics VI: Ceramic Transactions. 2012; 230:161-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118433010.ch12
Huang M, Niu X, Shrotriya P, Thompson V, Rekow D, Soboyejo WO. Contact damage of dental multilayers: viscous deformation and fatigue mechanisms. J Eng Mater Technol. 2005; 127:33-39. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1836769
Aboushelib MN. Fatigue and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns prepared with different finish line designs. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21:22-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00787.x PMid:22040309
Turkaslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Bagis B, Shinya A, Vallittu P.K Lassila L.V Effect of Intermediate Fiber Layer on the Fracture Load and Failure Mode of Maxillary Incisors Restored with Laminate Veneers. Dental Materials Journal. 2008; 27(1):61-68. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.61 PMid:18309613
Tam LE, Pilliar RM. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces. J Dent Res. 1993; 72:953-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720051801 PMid:8501294
Lin CP, Douglas WH. Failure mechanisms at the human dentin-resin interface: a fracture mechanics approach. J Biomech. 1994; 27:1037-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90220-8
Troedson M, Dérand T. Shear stresses in the adhesive layer under porcelain veneers. A finite element method study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998; 56(5):257-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598428419 PMid:9860092
Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res. 1999; 78:898-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780041001 PMid:10326734
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Katerina A. Zlatanovska, Cena Dimova, Nikola Gigovski, Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska, Natasa Longurova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
